Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T13CM05900
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/06/2013 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/15/2013 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Provide justification from the manufacturer as to why an indirect waste connection for the non-potable waste from the vacuum pump is not advisable. Reference: Section 301.7, IPC 2012. [Initial comment: Provide an air gap discharge for the non-potable waste from the vacuum pump. Reference: Section 802.1.5, IPC 2012.] |
| 11/15/2013 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | T13CM05900 4356 N Oracle Rd 1.Sheet E0.1 Panel A is fed with a 200 amp feeder, phase B is showing a load of 228 amps, over the 200 amp limit. 2. Note if the feeder is changed, verify the fault current is same or with in range for panel. Ray Majuta Elect Plan Review PDSD, Tucson 11/15/2013 Ray.Majuta@tucsonaz.gov |
| 11/25/2013 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Verify that the termination point of the roof drain is in an area that will be capable of absorbing the condensate flow. Condensate drains may not terminate over a roof drain unless the roof drain terminates at or above grade in an area capable of absorbing the condensate flow without surface drainage. Verify that the termination point of the roof drain is in an area that will be capable of absorbing the condensate flow. Reference: Section 307.2.1, IMC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson. [Initial comment: Show the size, routing, and termination of the condensate drains. Reference: Section 307.2.1, IMC 2012 as amended by the City of Tucson.] 2. Comment not resolved. Each multi-zone system (e.g. RTAC-1, RTAC-2, and RTAC-3) shall be individually calculated and the minimum outside air intake for each unit included with the balancing data (see Section 403.3.2.3). Show how each occupied space (e.g. room 106 and room 107) is receiving ventilation. [Initial comment: Provide calculations demonstrating adequate ventilation using the method shown in Section 403.3.2.3, IMC 2012 for multi-zone recirculating systems. (Note that ASHRAE 62.1 is not referenced in the 2012 IMC except as a means for determining the system ventilation efficiency.) Revise the occupancy classifications as required to accurately describe the activities occurring in each room (e.g. a lab, a waiting room, or a treatment room is not an office). Each multi-zone system (e.g. RTAC-1, RTAC-2, and RTAC-3) shall be individually calculated and the minimum outside air intake for each unit included with the balancing data. Show how each occupied space is receiving ventilation. Reference: Section 403.2, IMC 2012.] 3. Comment not addressed. [Initial comment: The portion of the building shell being modified in this activity does not appear to have been conditioned. Section C101.4.5, IECC 2012 requires the space to be brought into full compliance with the current energy code. Provide energy code compliance calculations for the building envelope; use the climate zone for Tucson. Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation and the SHGC for the fenestration. Reference: Sections C103.2 and C401.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2012.] |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12/03/2013 | SHANAE POWELL | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 12/03/2013 | CPIERCE1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |