Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI
Permit Number - T13CM05509
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/06/2013 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/06/2013 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/12/2013 | LEERAY HANLY | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Page a1.o a) Justify your allowable area figures for a type IIIB building and and A2 occupancy b) Coordinate occupancy calculations with egress plans. Humans do not come in tenths of a portion, round to the nearest whole number. c) the accessible requirement table includes a "bar" space. please clarify why this is not part of the dinging area as a whole. d) you have noted an existing 1 hour demising wall. A rated demising wall is not required and This tenant is going into a shell space where no walls exist, please clarify. e) you show existing fire extinguishers...please indicate their location as it seems unlikely they are already there. f) general note 7 indicates compliance with the 2006 IBC please correct for the current codes Page a1.1 a) Justify calling restrooms, parts of the kitchen, service areas, and egress paths a B occupancy. b) coordinate occupancy calculations with pp a1.0 c) fire protection note 7 asks for compliance with ibc 9112, there is no such section nor is there a section 911.2 Page sp2: delete incorrect standard suspended ceiling note1 and correct typo suspended ceiling note 8. PP a2.0 Demo keynote 3 refers to informtion not provided with this plan set. Clarify if there is an existing opening, if there is not an existing opening then provide a detail reference for the structural removal of this area. PP a3.0 IBC section 107.2.1 requires that documents be provided with sufficient clarity for review. This page contains excessive, redundant, and unclear notations, walltypes and detail references; therefore there is no clarity and therefore this page cannot be reviewed. pp a3.1 a) provide cut-detail references for counter elevations and unclear wall types (wall G) b) segregate wall construction types from wall finishes as it makes construction notes unclear. c) general note 3 references the wrong building code. d) general note 21 is a construction requirement that should be noted in a referenced detail for flooring installation. It is not a general method for workmanship similar to the other notes. PP a4.0 Providing keynotes and cutsheet references is redundant and clutters the page. Caution, fans shown under and next to supply registers could be a problem. Check for required clearances from fan manufacturer. pp a6.0 keynote 16 references a sliding gate but the cutsheet detail has a hinged gate. pp a5.0/a8.1 please provide manufacturer information for compatability of paint (note P12) with fireproofing material. pp a9.0 details 7,9,10 indicate compression struts and splayed bracing. Do you mean "where required for siesmic restraint" ? |
| 09/16/2013 | LEERAY HANLY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | PP M9.1 Required exhaust flow rate for restroom 114 is 140 cfm for intermittent or 100 for continuous (IMC table 403.3). If you mean for EF2 and EF3 to be continuous while occupied then please indicate on plans. Showing a 7day time clock for these fans would also resolve any sequence of operation questions regardeing compliance with IMC 403.2. Provide information from ceiling fan manufacturer regarding locations of supply diffusers within the cieling fan area. |
| 09/16/2013 | LEERAY HANLY | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Provide available fault current calculations 2) Provide outdoor lighting code compliance information. 3) Reconcile general note 9 pp e2.0 with general note 40 on e2.1. Clarify that all kitchen receptacles are to be GFCI protected in accordance with NEC 210.8. 4) Light fixture schedule for L14 does not coordinate with keynote 5 for frequency of lamps. |
| 09/16/2013 | LHANLY1 | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Approved | |
| 09/16/2013 | LEERAY HANLY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/17/2013 | LHANLY1 | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/24/2013 | KEN BROUILLETTE | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. The type of construction on this plan does not match the shell plans. Please clarify 2. Door swing in corridor 113 is not in the direction of exit travel. 3. Please review plans to indicate what City this project is being proposed and remove all statements regarding any other City of Fire Department that is not City of Tucson. 4. Not a complete list. |
| 10/14/2013 | CPIERCE1 | WWM | REVIEW | Completed |