Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI
Permit Number - T13CM05220
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/04/2013 | CPIERCE1 | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Passed | |
| 09/10/2013 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SHEET S-001; FOUNDATION NOTES: NOTE 1 INDICATES A SOIL REPORT WAS USED ON THIS PROJECT. PROVIDE THAT REPORT FOR REVIEW. 2. SHEETS S-110, S-120, S-130, S-200, S-300, S-301, S-302, S-400, S-501, S-502, AND S-503: THE SHEET NUMBER PORTION OF THE DETAIL REFERENCES ARE VERY LIGHT AND HARD TO READ. DARKEN THOSE SHEET NUMBER REFERENCES. 3. SHEET A-001; CODES AND REGULATIONS: UNDER THE NFPA CODE, THE 2006 EDITION IS LISTED. REVISE TO THE 2012 EDITION. 4. SHEET A-001; LIFE SAFETY LEGEND: REVISE THE STORAGE NOTE REFERENCE TO THE TABLE IN THE 2006 IBC TO THE TABLE REFERENCED IN THE 2012 IBC. 5. SHEET A-110 (FIRST FLOOR PLAN); SHEET A-200 (ELEVATION H3): THE ELEVATION ON THE PLAN IS LOCATED BETWEEN GRIDS A AND B, WHILE THE ELEVATION INDICATES GRIDS P AND Q. CLARIFY. 6. SHEET A-110 (FIRST FLOOR PLAN); SHEET A-200 (ELEVATION J1): THE ELEVATION ON THE PLAN IS LOCATED BETWEEN GRIDS 5 AND 6, WHILE THE ELEVATION INDICATES GRIDS P AND P. CLARIFY. 7. SHEET A-110 (FIRST FLOOR PLAN); SHEET A-200 (ELEVATION G1): THE ELEVATION ON THE PLAN IS LOCATED BETWEEN GRIDS A, B, C, AND D, WHILE THE ELEVATION INDICATES GRIDS N, O, P, AND Q. CLARIFY. 8. GENERAL: IT IS CLEAR THAT SOME EXTERIOR WALL ELEVATION GRID LINES INDICATED ON THE PLANS (A-110 AND A-120) DO NOT MATCH GRID LINES SHOWN ON THE ELEVATIONS (SHEETS A-200, A-201, AND A-202). REVISE AS REQUIRED. 9. SHEET A-130; CANOPY ROOF PLAN LEVEL 1: FINISH THE SECTION CUT IN THE WEST WALL. 10. SHEET A-200; ELEVATIONS C1, G1, C3, H3, C6, AND G6: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE THE ELEVATION REFERENCES. 11. SHEET A-200; ELEVATIONS G1 AND J1: NOTE 6 HAS NO VERBIAGE. PROVIDE. 12. SHEET A-200; ELEVATIONS C1 AND E6: MOST OF THE NOTES HAVE NO VERBIAGE. PROVIDE. 13. SHEET A-200; ELEVATION H1: NOTE 6 HAS NO VERBIAGE. PROVIDE. 14. SHEET A-301; SECTION B1: FINISH THE SECTION CUT AT THE ROOF. 15. SHEET A-800; SITE WALL PLAN B3: REVISE THE ELEVATION REFERENCE AT THE LEFT END OF THE PLAN TO H1/A800. 16. SHEET A-801; DETAILS C3, B4, AND H4: THESE THREE DETAILS REFERENCE STRUCTURAL FOR SPECIFIC WALL REINFORCING. NO STRUCTURAL DETAILS WERE LOCATED FOR THESE SITE WALLS ON THE DRAWINGS. VERIFY. 17. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 09/11/2013 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 09/11/2013 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 09/11/2013 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/12/2013 | KEN BROUILLETTE | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/13/2013 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/17/2013 | ELIZABETH EBERBACH | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: September 17, 2013 TO: William Hobbs, R.A. SUBJECT: TMC Wyatt MOB Renovation 1st Engineering Review ADDRESS: 2424 N Wyatt Dr FLOODPLAIN STATUS: X-unshaded zones, 1694L REVIEWER: Elizabeth Leibold, P.E. ACTIVITY NUMBER: T13CM05220 SUMMARY: The renovation plans were submitted including sheets for the exterior area including new proposed site walls. Engineering Division of Planning & Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed plan and does not recommend approval until the following comment is addressed. COMMENTS: 1) Admin Man Sec.2-06.4.9.J: Since project site is adjacent to a Major Street or Route, draw the Major Street right-of-way lines for Grant Road (future 120-ft right-of-way). Label the MS&R sidewalk, right-of-way lines, sight visibility triangles, etc. as future (and existing if the same). 2) Tech Man Sec.10-01.5.2.B.4: Near side distance for Arterial Through Street with a Drive/PAAL Stem Street, is 345 feet. Optional: the 20-foot (stem) by 30-foot (curb) pedestrian visibility triangle may be shown on the opposite side of approaching traffic since Grant Road has a median island. 3) Tech Man Sec.10-01.5.1.B.2: To show proposed wall is complaint with SVT requirements, show and label on sheet 800, the existing and future sight visibility triangles based on the MS&R Plan, since Grant Road is listed as MS&R Arterial Road. If you have questions, you are welcome to call me at 837-4934. Elizabeth Leibold, P.E., CPM, CFM Civil Engineer Engineering Division Planning & Development Services Department |
| 09/20/2013 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: T13CM05220 2424 N Wyatt Drive Interior Remodel and Facade work on north entrance For Wyatt Building, Site wall along the south side of the Wyatt Building TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 23, 2013 DUE DATE: October 2, 2013 COMMENTS: 01. On sheet A-800, the proposed wall is dimensioned at 19'-5" from the exiting face of curb location. The wall height from design grade is labeled at 7'-2.5". Any structure including walls must meet the minimum building setback from the existing and future Property line or in this case the existing and future back of curb location. The perimeter wall does not meet the minimum building setback of 21 feet from the existing or future curb location. A Board of Adjustment variance for the setback is required or the wall must be relocated to meet existing and future building setbacks or comply with UDC Section 6.6.2.I. Additional comments may be forthcoming on this item on the next review based on the response or revision to the plan sheet A-800. 02. The existing and future right of way information must be drawn, labeled and dimensioned on sheet A-800. The 03. Zoning will re-review the building plans on the next submittal of the building plans. If the wall is to remain as depicted on the plan a Board of Adjustment Variance will have to be processed. 04. Existing and future Sight visibility triangles must be drawn, labeled and dimensioned on sheet A-800. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised plans per zoning comments |
| 09/24/2013 | CPIERCE1 | WWM | REVIEW | Completed |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/02/2013 | CPIERCE1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |