Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Permit Number - T13CM05208
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/26/2013 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | |
| 08/28/2013 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/29/2013 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. The Envelope and Mechanical Compliance Certificates shown on sheet ACS2 have fonts that are shorter than 3/32-inch in height. Revise the font size used on the drawing to a minimum height of 3/32-inch or submit the Envelope and Mechanical Compliance Certificates on letter-size paper (8.5"x11"). Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. 2. Complete the Envelope Compliance Certificate and the Mechanical Compliance Certificate by checking the appropriate line items in Section 3, the Requirements Checklist. Supporting documentation shall be either on the drawings or in the project manual. 3. Revise the energy code analysis for the building envelope, coordinating the building components used in the analysis with those shown on the drawings. The roof has a metal, standing-seam layer it is not a "metal building standing-seam roof with thermal blocks"; the walls have R-19 batt insulation, but R-5 continuous insulation is shown on some of the wall sections. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. 4. Provide structural calculations to verify that the roof is capable of supporting the installation of the roof top units. Reference: Section 302.1, IMC 2012 5. Clarify the plan for disposing of the condensate from the rooftop units. The condensate drain detail on sheet P3.1 calls for the condensate piping to be terminated over a roof scupper but the design on sheet P2.1 terminates the condensate at the utility sink. Condensate drains may not terminate over a roof drain or downspout unless the roof drain or downspout terminates at or above grade in an area capable of absorbing the condensate flow without surface drainage. Reference: Section 307.2.1, IMC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson. 6. Provide structural calculations and details to show that the Type I hoods are supported from the building structure in accordance with Section 507.6, IMC 2006 (i.e. include the weight of the hood and the weight of a person working on the hood). Reference: Section 302.1, IMC 2012. |
| 08/29/2013 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide tempered water for the lavatories and public hand-washing sinks using approved devices conforming to ASSE 1070. Note that the specified temperature mixing valve (Leonard TM-30-E) is obsolete. Reference: Sections 416.5 and 607.1.2, IPC 2012. 2. Coordinate the location of the reduced pressure backflow preventer for the building water service with the civil drawings. The reduced pressure backflow preventer for the building water service is located adjacent to the water meter at the north property line. A separate water meter and backflow preventer for the irrigation system are also located at the north property line; on the civil plans, the irrigation water service does not enter the building. Reference: Chapter XXVII, Article V, Section 27-72, the Tucson Code, http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/sites/default/files/water/docs/backflow-ordinance.pdf 3. Provide calculations showing how the water supply piping has been sized. Reference: Sections 604.1 and 604.3, IPC 2012. 4. Verify that the pipe sizes called out for the flush valves will not result in water velocities greater than that recommended by the pipe manufacturer (e.g. limit the water velocity to less than 8 FPS for CPVC piping). Reference: Table 604.3, IPC 2012. 5. An approved 2-way cleanout fitting is allowed to be used at the junction of a building drain and a building sewer; otherwise, cleanouts shall open to allow cleaning in the direction of flow. Reference: Sections 708.3.5 and 708.5, IPC 2012. 6. Correct the cleanout shown in room 119 on sheet P2.1 for the grease waste. Cleanouts shall open to allow cleaning in the direction of flow. Reference: Section 708.5, IPC 2012. 7. Indirect waste piping that has a developed length greater than 30-inches (30") when measured horizontally or greater than 54-inches (54") in total developed length shall be trapped. Exception: indirect waste piping conveying only clear-water waste (e.g. effluent from a sanitizing compartment) does not require a trap. Reference: Section 802.2, IPC 2012. 8. Provide roof drainage and hydraulic scupper calculations for the four unequal-sized drainage areas. Reference: Sections 1101 and 1106, IPC 2012. 9. Coordinate the gas loads shown on the gas piping isometric (P4.3) with the gas loads shown on sheets P1.1, P2.3, and AC1.1. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. 10. The gas piping plan (P2.3) shows a 4" gas line running west from the main north-south pipe line with no visible terminal load: drafting error? Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. 11. Verify the size of the gas branch serving the cook line; according to Table 402.4(2), IFGC 2012, a total load of 896 CFH at a developed length of 125 feet requires a 2-1/2" pipe. |
| 09/04/2013 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | T13CM05208 5725 E Broadway Bl Cheddars Restaurant 1. City of Tucson Commercial Submittal Requirements:"minimum text size of 3/32" uppercase or lowercase". Sheets E1.2, ES.1, and ES2 are examples of text being too small. 2. Sheet E1.1, The City of Tucson requires compliance with it's current 2012 Outdoor Lighting Code by providing a calculation. The Outdoor Lighting Code can be found on the City web page by entering Planning and Development Services under 'Search', to Codes and Ordinances to Tucson Outdoor Lighting Code. Under Table 401.1 an option must be choosen , Full Cut Off and Unshielded lumen output of all outdoor fixtures must be calculated according to area of site.Indicate which are Full Cut Off and Unshielded. All outdoor fixtures are required to have a color rated temperature of 3500K minimum (402.1 ODLC). The spec sheets submitted do not have this information and is required. 3. Sheet E1.1 shows circuit L-36 used for lighting and the Monument Sign, 2011 NEC 600.5 requires the sign to have it's own circuit. 4. Please indicate on Sheet E4.2, kitchen receptacles to be GFCI protected per 2011 NEC 210.8(B).2. 5. Sheet E6.1, why are the total va values in Panel MDP different than shown in individual Panels ? 6. Per City Submittal Requirements, a fault current analysis is to be provided, preferrably on Sheet E6.1. 7. Sheet E6.1, the total kva connected load shown in the Optional Restaurant Calculations is 299,017va, the total in Panel MDP is 253,375va, show how different values obtained . Ray T Majuta Elect Plan Review PDSD, Tucson 9/4/2013 Ray.Majuta@tucsonaz.gov 520/837/4988 |
| 09/11/2013 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | From: David Rivera, Principal Planner Activity No: T13CM05208 - New Restaurant Building - Texas Longhorn Address: 5725 E Broadway Blvd. Building Plans Review 1. Zoning has reviewed the building plans and compared them to the preliminary development package site plan for compliance. While the building plan are in substantial compliance with the preliminary development package site plan as it pertains to the zoning review purview, zoning cannot approve the building plans until the DP is approved. 2. This site is subject to rezoning conditions and four (4) conditions deal with the building. The most current conditions are dated 8/29/2013. Provide a response letter how conditions of rezoning #8, 14, 18, and 25 have been addressed on the building plans. Provide the info where on the plans the four (4) conditions as noted above have been addressed. Condition #8 requires that a color palette and dimensioned elevation drawings on 11" x 17" drawings be submitted as part of the development plan submittal to demonstrate compliance with this condition. 3. The site plan that is included with the building plans must be revised to the most current site plan created as part of the development package submittal. The site plan in the building plan set does not match the preliminary site plan in the development package. The development package site plan has been through the first review so the second submittal may include a revised site plan based on the rezoning conditions. Ensure that building plans include the most current site plan that matches the DP. |
| 09/12/2013 | RONALD BROWN | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | SHEETS S1.1, S2.1, S3.1, S4.1, S4.2 1. As listed in the Index on sheet T1.1, all these sheets are missing. Please include in next submittal. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS 2. Please provide structural calculations and structural details for the following: a. All Roof mounted HVAC equipment b. All suspended exhaust hoods c. All lighting pole foundations 3. Please provide key plans for all framing and foundation calculations. SHEET A7.3 4. At details J1 and E1, please provide a 3'-0" wide urinal stall as required by 2009 ICC A117.1, Section 605.3 and 305.7. GENERAL 5. Several sheets including all disiplines, have lettering that is non-compliant with City of Tucson standards; minimum 3/32" actual, both upper and lower case 6. Please provide certification of all special inspectors required by the 2012 IBC and your structural engineer. END OF REVIEW |
| 09/13/2013 | RONALD BROWN | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Completed | |
| 09/19/2013 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | The development package must be approved first. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09/19/2013 | CPIERCE1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |