Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Permit Number - T13CM05156
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/22/2013 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | NEED TO UPDATE DOOR SCHEDULE WITH PATIO DOORS AND ADD EXIT SIGNS AND LIGHTING IN PATIO AREA FOR EGRESS. |
| 08/26/2013 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/26/2013 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Revise the size of the condensate drains in accordance with Section 307.2.2, IMC 2012. Note that the Lennox rooftop units have 1" condensate outlets and the CaptiveAire make-up air unit has both a 1" condensate drain (15-tons) and a 1-1/2" drain from the evaporative cooler section. 2. Provide calculations demonstrating adequate ventilation for the building. Reference: Section 403.2, IMC 2012. |
| 08/27/2013 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide natural gas pipe sizing calculations. Include the developed pipe lengths from the meter (or pressure regulator, as appropriate) to each load on plans. Reference: Section 402.3, IFGC 2012. 2. Clarify the gas valves shown on the gas floor plan (P1.3). The water heaters and each kitchen appliance have both a shutoff cock and another valve that appears to be similar to your symbol for an electric solenoid valve. The additional valves are not shown on the gas isometric diagram (P2.3). 3. Provide calculations showing how the water supply piping has been sized. Show all of the pipe sizes on the drawings (i.e. on the plumbing plan or the water supply isometric diagram). Reference: Sections 604.1 and 604.3, IPC 2012. 4. The pollution control unit (PCU-1) requires a supply of hot water at 46 PSI to 70 PSI and a minimum temperature of 140 degrees Fahrenheit. (This is not part of the fire protection requirements.) Verify that this hot water supply is available and meets the manufacturer's requirements. Reference: sheet M5.4 and Section 303.2, IPC 2012. 5. Provide backflow protection for the pollution control unit (PCU-1). Reference: Sections 608.16.6 and 608.16.7, IPC 2012. 6. Provide tempered water for the lavatory, LAV-2, using an approved device conforming to ASSE 1070. Reference: Sections 416.5 and 607.1.2, IPC 2012. 7. Provide cleanouts for all horizontal branch drains (horizontal branch drains receive the discharge of two or more fixtures); the cleanouts shall be sized per Section 708.7, IPC 2012 and shall open to allow cleaning in the direction of flow. Reference: Sections 708.3.1 and 708.5, IPC 2012. 8. Revise detail 12/P4.1 to provide separate indirect waste pipes for the ice maker and the ice bin drains to protect against cross-contamination or fouling. Reference: Section 801.2, IPC 2012. 9. Verify that the roof drains used for the secondary (overflow) roof drainage system conform to ASME A112.6.4 (i.e. the secondary roof drain shall have a strainer to prevent debris from clogging the secondary storm drainage piping). Reference: Section 1102.6, IPC 2012. |
| 08/27/2013 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SHEET A0.2: PROVIDE A VERTICAL GRAB BAR AT THE WATER CLOSET SIDEWALL PER ICC/ANSI FIGURE 604.5.1. 2. SHEET A0.4; DETAIL 4: PROVIDE THE WIDTH DIMENSION OF THE CONCRETE STOP ON THE DETAIL. 3. SHEETS A1.0 THROUGH A1.6: PROVIDE A NORTH ARROW ON THESE SHEETS. 4. SHEET A1.1; FLOOR PLAN: A DETAIL REFERENCE IN THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE PLAN INDICATES 17/A3.7. REVISE THAT REFERENCE. 5. SHEET A1.1; FLOOR PLAN: A DETAIL REFERENCE AT THE ENTRY/VESTIBULE AREA INDICATES 12/A3.7. REVISE THAT REFERENCE. 6. SHEET A1.1; KEY NOTES: NOTE 15 WAS NOT LOCATED ON THE PLAN. VERIFY. 7. SHEET A1.7; DETAIL 15: PROVIDE A VERTICAL GRAB BAR AT THE WATER CLOSET SIDEWALL PER ICC/ANSI FIGURE 604.5.1. 8. SHEET A3.1; SECTION 1: IS THE DETAIL REFERENCE 5/A3.3 AT THE ROOF CORRECT? VERIFY. 9. SHEET A3.5; DETAIL 15: IS THE SECTION CUT 9/A3.6 CORRECT? VERIFY. 10. SHEET A3.10; DETAIL 1: EXTEND THE SECTION CUT 2/A3.10 DOWN THROUGH THE BASE. 11. SHEET A3.10; DETAIL 11: IS THE SECTION CUT 12/A3.10 THROUGH THE UPPER WALL DETAIL CORRECT? VERIFY. 12. SHEETS SP.1 THROUGH SP.14: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE THE NOTES. 13. SHEET S0.1; DETAIL 13: STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS ARE REQUIRED FOR LIGHT POLES EXCEEDING 20' IN HEIGHT. VERIFY THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF THE SITE LIGHT POLES. 14. SHEET S1.0 (FOUNDATION PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEAR WALL LAYOUT PLAN): SHEAR WALL #4 IN THE CALCULATIONS INDICATES SW2 (AND SW1 ON THE FOLLOWING SHEET), WHILE THE PLAN INDICATES SW1. CLARIFY. 15. SHEETS S1.0, S1.1, S2.0, AND S2.1: PROVIDE A NORTH ARROW ON THE PLANS. 16. SHEET S2.0 (ROOF FRAMING PLAN); SHEET S4.1 (DETAIL 10): THE DETAIL INDICATES A STEEL TUBE BEARING ON THE MASONRY, WHILE THE PLAN INDICATES A WOOD BEAM. CLARIFY. 17. SHEET S2.0; ROOF FRAMING PLAN: REVISE THE DETAIL CUT REFERENCE 11/S4.2 AT GRIDS 10 AND E. THERE IS NO DETAIL 11 ON SHEET S4.2. 18. SHEET S3.0; DETAIL 4: PROVIDE A REINFORCING BAR DIAGRAM FOR THE #3 HAIRPIN DOWELS. 19. SHEET S3.0; DETAIL 6: PROVIDE A REINFORCING BAR DIAGRAM FOR THE #3 HAIRPIN DOWELS. 20. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS: PROVIDE A KEY PLAN FOR THE ROOF FRAMING, ALONG WITH SHEET NUMBERS FOR THE CALCULATIONS. 21. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS; ROOF DESIGN LOADS: A MECHANICAL/ELECTRICAL UNIFORM LOAD OF 2.0 PSF IS INDICATED FOR THE ROOF DESIGN. SHOULD CONCENTRATED LOADS BE NOTED FOR THE HOODS, RTU'S, AND MAU'S INDICATED? VERIFY. 22. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS: WHERE IN THE CALCULATIONS ARE THE NAILING PATTERNS AND ANCHOR BOLT SPACINGS SHOWN FOR THE VARIOUS SHEAR WALLS? VERIFY. 23. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS; CEILING HEADER BEAM ALONG THE ATRIUM FRONT AND BACK EDGE: WHERE IS THIS BEAM (3 ½" X 9 ¼" LVL) SHOWN ON THE PLAN? VERIFY. 24. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS; PATIO TRELLIS JOIST BEAM: WHERE IS THIS BEAM (4X12) SHOWN ON THE PLAN? VERIFY. 25. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS; PATIO TRELLIS SUPPORT BEAM: WHERE IS THIS BEAM (6X14) SHOWN ON THE PLAN? VERIFY. 26. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 08/28/2013 | ERIC NEWCOMB | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Approved | |
| 09/03/2013 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | T13CM05156 36555 E Broadway Bl Cheddars Restaurant 1.Per City of Tucson Submittal Requirements, all lettering and numbering to be 3/32" minimun. Sheet ES.1 fixture spec's and Sheet E2.0- Hercules Controller Schedule too small. 2. Sheet ES.1 fixture spec sheet, ( Per City of Tucson Outdoor Lighting Code), all outdoor fixtures to have a color rated temperature of 3500K or less, needs to be verified, spec sheet does not indicate. This would include all other fixtures used outdoors. 3. The city of Tucson has an Outdoor Lighring Code 2012 which requires all outdoor lighting (including on building) to comply. Can be found on the City of Tucson Web page by going to Departments, Planning and Development Services, to Codes and Ordinances then to Building Codes. By review of Table 401.1, a lighting area has be choosen first then an option which allows certain amounts of shielded and un-shielded lumens (of lighting) per acre site. A calculation is to be submitted showing usage of lumen output per acre. This calculation would include all outdoor lighting such as parking, patio, roof and any lighting on building face. 4. Fault current Sheet E2.0 shown beginning at 33,310 amps, the Tucson Electric Utility SR book lists the fault current for a 1200 amp 120/203 3 phase at 75,100 amps. With the Utility transformer so close how was the 33,310 amp value obtained ? Ray T Majuta Elect Plan Review PDSD, Tucson 9/03/2013 Ray.Majuta@tucsonaz.gov 520/837/4988 |
| 09/11/2013 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | From: David Rivera, Principal Planner Date: September 11, 2013 Project: T13CM05156 Building plan review for the Cheddar"s Restaurant at El Con Address: 3455 E Broadway Blvd. 1. Zoning has reviewed the building plans for compliance with the Development Package in for review. While the building plans are in substantial compliance with the Preliminary development package site zoning cannot approve the buildings plans until the development package is approved. 2. One of the requirements for all restaurants in the El Con Mall is to provide exhaust scrubbers that complies with the rezoning conditions. Zoning could not verify compliance with this condition. Provide documentation of the type of Scrubber proposed and indicate with a response comment where the information for the scrubber is located on the building plans. 3. The patio along the south side of the building was not clearly depicted on the development package site plan. The building plans indicate the patio is to be covered. The building setbacks for from the street side must be dimensioned and labeled. The roof structure for the patio must be drawn and labeled as well as the height of the patio structure. 4. Zoning will re-review the building plans on the next submittal and compare them to the approved Development Package. Keep in mind that the building plans cannot be approved by zoning until a full approval of the development package has occurred. |
| 09/13/2013 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | The development package must be approved. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09/16/2013 | CPIERCE1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |