Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T13CM05148
Parcel: 127035560

Address:
5555 E 5TH ST

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW

Permit Number - T13CM05148
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
08/22/2013 MARTIN BROWN FIRE REVIEW Approved
08/23/2013 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. The roof drainage calculations submitted for the existing roof along with the new tower roof are incorrect. Table 1106.3 is for horizontal pipes running full, not for semi-circular gutters which are sized using Table 1106.6, IPC 2012. Based on Table 1106.6 and assuming a slope of ΒΌ" per foot and three downspouts, the minimum gutter size is 10", not 6". Provide the slope of the gutters. Reference: Sections 1106 and 1108, IPC 2012.
2. Clarify how the new tower roof is to drain onto the existing roof.
08/23/2013 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Complete the Envelope Compliance section of the energy calculations for the building envelope to show compliance to Section C401.2, IECC 2012. The output submitted for COMcheck shows "Envelope Fails".
2. Complete the Envelope Compliance Certificate by checking the appropriate line items in Section 3, the Air Leakage, Component Certification, and Vapor Retarder Requirements. Supporting documentation shall be either on the drawings or in the project manual. The project manual shall be sealed per Section R4-30-304 of the Rules of the Board of Technical Registration.
3. Revise the energy code analysis for the building envelope, coordinating the building components used in the analysis with those shown on the drawing (e.g. R-19 batt insulation in the furr-in cavity is not continuous insulation, no insulation is called out for the new roof, etc.). Reference: Section C303.1, IECC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson.
4. Complete the Mechanical Compliance Certificate by checking the appropriate line items in Section 4, the Requirements Checklist. Supporting documentation (e.g. automatic start controls, automatic shut-off dampers for exhaust and intake openings, commissioning, etc) shall be either on the drawings or in the project manual.
5. Full compliance with the 2012 IECC requires that an "additional efficiency package option" be selected per Section C406. Identify which of the three options has been selected.
08/23/2013 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Approved
08/30/2013 ERIC NEWCOMB BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. SHEET T1.1; GENERAL BUILDING SUMMARY: THE 'ACTUAL BUILDING AREA' LISTED IN THE TABLE IS 21,964 SF, WHILE THE BREAKDOWN LISTS 13,569 AND 8372 SF (TOTAL OF 21,968 SF), AND THE PARKING CALCULATIONS LIST 22,000 SF. CLARIFY.
2. SHEET T1.1; OCCUPANCY/EXIT PLAN: THE SUITE ON THE LEFT SIDE (8372 SF) SHOULD BE DESIGNATED AS SUITE B. VERIFY.
3. SHEET T1.1; OCCUPANCY/EXIT PLAN: SUITE B HAS TWO NOTES FOR DISTANCE BETWEEN EXITS (149' AND 200'). CLARIFY.
4. SHEET D1.1; DEMOLITION FLOOR PLAN: IN THE SOUTHEAST AREA OF THE BUILDING, THERE IS A ROOM WITH TWO KEYNOTES THAT ARE NOT LEGIBLE. REVISE.
5. SHEET D2.1; KEYNOTES: NOTE 2 WAS NOT LOCATED ON THE ELEVATIONS. VERIFY.
6. SHEET AS1.1 (DETAIL 5); SHEET S0.2 (DETAIL 013): COORDINATE THE PIER SIZE AND THE DEPTH OF THE PIER BELOW FINISH PAVING FOR THESE TWO DETAILS.
7. SHEET A1.1; KEYNOTES: NOTES 3 AND 19 WERE NOT LOCATED ON THE PLAN. VERIFY.
8. SHEET A2.1; KEYNOTES: NOTE 3 WAS NOT LOCATED ON THE ELEVATIONS. VERIFY.
9. SHEET A4.1; KEYNOTES: NOTE 3 ON SECTIONS 1 AND 2 IS POINTED TO THE WRONG BUILDING ELEMENT. REVISE.
10. SHEET A5.1; KEYNOTES: NOTE 8 WAS NOT LOCATED ON THE SECTIONS. VERIFY.
11. SHEET A7.1; DETAIL 9: THE DISTANCE FROM THE FINISHED CONCRETE SLAB TO THE BOTTOM OF THE SIGN SHOULD BE 7'-0". REVISE.
12. SHEET S1.1 (FOUNDATION PLAN); SHEET S4.2: TWO ELEVATON REFERENCES ON GRID 3 BETWEEN GRIDS A AND B INDICATE 419. ADD ELEVATION 419 TO THE DRAWINGS.
13. SHEET S2.1; ROOF FRAMING PLAN: ALONG GRID 3, MOVE THE STEEL BEAM DESIGNATIONS (W16X45) SO THE SIZES ARE LEGIBLE.
14. SHEET S2.1 (ROOF FRAMING PLAN); SHEET S4.2 (DETAIL 417): IS THE DETAIL CUT 417 ON THE PLAN (AT GRID 3 BETWEEN GRIDS H AND J) CORRECT AT THIS LOCATION? VERIFY.
15. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS.
09/04/2013 JASON GREEN ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change Need an approved DP Package for all proposed on site changes. T13CM05148 is for a new shell building only however proposed plan is showing revisions to the parking area and striping.
09/05/2013 RAY MAJUTA ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied T13CM05148
5555 E 5TH ST
New Shell

1. Sheet E5.1, showing 5 sets of 4 #350 AL which provide only 1250 amps for the 1600 amp service ? Per 310.15, 75 degree C column, 2011 NEC.
2. The 2012 Outdoor Lighting Code requires the color temperature of light sources ( lamps and fixtures) not to exceed 3500K, cannot find this value anywhere on the spec sheets. Per Section 402.1. ODLC.

Ray Majuta
Elect Plan Review
PDSD, C of T,
9/6/2013
Ray.Majuta@tucsonaz.gov
520/837/4988
09/13/2013 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Denied PDSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: 5555 E. 5th Street
T13CM05148
Building Plan (1st Review)

TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 13, 2013

1. The building plans have been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed.

3. Until the development package has been approved the building plans cannot be approved.

4. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved development package. Additional comments may be forthcoming.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
10/01/2013 AROMERO4 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
10/01/2013 CPIERCE1 REJECT SHELF Completed