City of Tucson

Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: T13CM04929

Parcel: 141186130

Address:

9100 S HOUGHTON RD

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW

Permit Number - T13CM04929

Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW

Review Status: Completed

Review Date	Reviewer's Name	Type of Review	Description	Status	Comments
08/14/2013	ROBERT SHERRY	WATER	REVIEW	Approved
08/15/2013	ROBERT SHERRY	MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL	REVIEW	Denied	1. Complete the Envelope Compliance Certificate by checking the appropriate line items in Section 3, the Air Leakage, Component Certification, and Vapor Retarder Requirements. Supporting documentation shall be either on the drawings or in the project manual.. 2. Complete the Mechanical Compliance Certificate by checking the appropriate line items in Section 4, the Requirements Checklist. Supporting documentation may be either on the drawings or in the project manual. 3. Provide heating and cooling load calculations that justify the capacities of the heat pumps specified for this project. Reference: Sections C403.2.1 and C403.2.2, IECC 2012. 4. Show that each rooftop unit has a thermostatic control that provides for off-hour and set-back control, automatic shutdown and start-up control and, restricts set point overlap. Reference: Section C403.2.4, IECC 2012.
08/15/2013	ROBERT SHERRY	PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL	REVIEW	Denied	1. Clarify the size of the water piping as it enters the building: it appears to enter the building as a 1-1/2" pipe, continues vertically as a 2" pipe, and then runs horizontally as a 1-1/4" pipe to the pipe chase where it drops down to below the mezzanine as either a 1-1/4" (on sheet P1.0) or a 2" pipe (on sheet P2.0). No branches are evident along this torturous path. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. 2. The direct-connection of water to an appliance or device (e.g. a misting system) shall be protected against backflow. Specify the device to be used for the appliance connection. Reference: Sections 608.1 and 608.15, IPC 2012. 3. Verify that all of the vents located within the building rise vertically to at least 6" above the flood rims of the fixtures they protect prior to running horizontally. Reference: Section 905.4, IPC 2012. 4. The sand/oil waste collection system includes p-traps at each floor drain and at the outlet of the trench drain. Clarify how these p-traps are to be self-scouring when presented with sand-bearing waste. Reference: Section 1002.2, IPC 2012.
08/16/2013	MARTIN BROWN	FIRE	REVIEW	Approv-Cond	Note 18 on sheet HC1 refers to painted red curb for parking restriction. The only approved method for designating No Parking - Fire Lane is by the sign(s) referenced in the Technical Standards. Please change note if plans are to be resubmitted.
08/21/2013	ERIC NEWCOMB	BUILDING-COMMERCIAL	REVIEW	Denied	1. SHEET A1.0; DESIGN CODES: ADD THE ICC/ANSI A117.1-2009 TO THE CODE LIST. 2. SHEET A1.0: PROVIDE ON THE DRAWING A CALCULATION INDICATING THE MINIMUM NUMBER OF MALE/FEMALE RESTROOMS, DRINKING FOUNTAINS, AND SERVICE SINK REQUIRED BY CHAPTER 29 OF THE IBC. 3. SHEET A2.1; DETAIL 21: REVISE THE DIMENSION FROM THE FINISH GRADE TO THE BOTTOM OF THE SIGN TO 7'-0". 4. SHEET A2.1; DETAIL 20: REVISE NOTE 1 TO INDICATE THE BOTTOM OF THE SIGN ABOVE GRADE TO BE 7'-0". 5. SHEET A2.1; DETAIL 3: A NOTE ON THE LOWER RIGHT OF THE DETAIL INDICATES TO "REFER TO STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FOR MORE INFORMATION" ON THE BOLLARD FOOTING. A DETAIL 8/A2.1 INDICATES A BOLLARD FOOTING. COORDINATE (THERE IS NO BOLLARD FOOTING ON THE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS). 6. SHEET A2.1; DETAIL 4; ELEVATION 6: FOR THE 4"X4" STEEL TUBE, PROVIDE THE WALL THICKNESS IN THE REFERENCE NOTES. 7. SHEET A2.1; PLAN 5; DETAIL 3: THE 8" CMU WALL NOTE SHOULD INCLUDE THE VERBIAGE 'SEE DETAIL 26/S1.4 FOR MORE INFORMATION'. REVISE THE CURRENT NOTE. 8. SHEET A3.1; PLAN: PROVIDE A TITLE AND A NORTH ARROW ON THE PLAN. 9. SHEET A3.1 (PLAN); SHEET A4.1 (BUILDING ELEVATIONS): VERIFY THE DIRECTION OF THE ELEVATIONS (IN THEIR TITLES) MATCHES THE PLAN. 10. SHEET A3.1; PLAN: IN THE COMPRESSOR ROOM, CLEAR UP THE DIMENSION FROM A KEY NOTE. BOTH ARE NOT LEGIBLE. 11. SHEET A3.1; KEY NOTES: REVISE THE VERBIAGE IN NOTES 4 AND 19 TO 'NOT USED'. 12. SHEET A3.1; KEY NOTES: NOTE 17 WAS NOT LOCATED ON THE PLAN. VERIFY. 13. SHEET A3.1; KEY NOTES: NOTE 7 INDICATES "STORAGE RACK SYSTEM BY OWNER". WILL THIS BE A DEFERRED SUBMITTAL? IF SO, THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE IBC SECTION 107.3.4.1 MUST BE MET. 14. SHEET A3.2 (PLAN); SHEET A7.1 (ELEVATION 21): THE ELEVATION IS SHOWN REVERSED. VERIFY. 15. SHEET A3.2 (PLAN); SHEET A7.2 (ELEVATION 17A): SHOULD THIS ELEVATION BE INDICATED IN THE WOMEN'S RESTROOM (ROOM 106)? VERIFY. 16. SHEET A3.2 (PLAN); SHEET A7.2 (ELEVATION 17B): THIS ELEVATION COMBINES THE WOMEN'S RESTROOM (ROOM 106) WITH THE EMPLOYEE RESTROOM (ROOM 107). REVISE. 17. SHEET A3.2 (KEY NOTES); SHEET S5.3: IN NOTE 37, REFERENCE STRUCTURAL DETAILS 226 AND 227. 18. SHEET A4.1; NORTH ELEVATION 22: MOVE THE AREA INDICATED AS DETAIL 2/A4.1 TO INCLUDE THE ACTUAL DETAILED AREA. 19. SHEET A5.1; KEY NOTES: REVISE THE VERBIAGE IN NOTE 13 TO 'NOT USED'. 20. SHEET A5.1; KEY NOTES: NOTE 1 WAS NOT LOCATED IN THE SECTIONS. VERIFY. 21. SHEET A6.2; TRELLIS PLAN: A SECTION CUT ON THE PLAN INDICATES 9/A6.2. REVISE (NO SECTION 9 ON SHEET A6.2). 22. SHEET A7.1; KEY NOTES: NOTES 3 AND 4 WERE NOT LOCATED IN THE ELEVATIONS. VERIFY. 23. SHEET S1.1: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE THE NOTES. 24. SHEET S1.1 (GENERAL STRUCTURAL NOTES); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 9): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE MW1 AND MW2 TO BE REINFORCED WITH 2-#5 @ 24" O.C., WHILE THE MASONRY GENERAL NOTES INDICATE 2-#5 NOT TO EXCEED 48" O.C. CLARIFY. WHERE IS THE NOTE ON THE DRAWINGS THAT INDICATES THE CALCULATION REQUIREMENTS? 25. SHEET S2.1 (FOUNDATION PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 95): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE FOUR COLUMNS AND FOOTINGS AT FRAME 1, WHILE THE PLAN INDICATES FIVE. REVISE THE CALCULATIONS/DRAWINGS AS REQUIRED (THE MOMENT FRAME MODEL IN THE CALCULATIONS DOES SHOW FIVE COLUMNS). 26. SHEET S2.1 (FOUNDATION PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 111): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE THE FOOTINGS (F2) AT SW3, SW4, SW5, AND SW6 HAVE #5 @ 8" O.C. EACH WAY BOTTOM, WHILE THE DRAWINGS INDICATE #5 @ 10" O.C. EACH WAY BOTTOM. CLARIFY. 27. SHEET S2.1; PLAN KEY NOTES: NOTE 2 INDICATES "STAIRS BY OTHERS". WILL THIS BE A DEFERRED SUBMITTAL? IF SO, THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE IBC SECTION 107.3.4.1 MUST BE MET. 28. SHEET S3.1: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE THE NOTES. 29. SHEET S3.1; PLAN KEY NOTES: NOTE 11 WAS NOT LOCATED ON THE PLANS. VERIFY. 30. SHEET S4.1; DETAIL 101 (CONSTRUCTION JOINT): CLEAR UP THE LEADER ARROWS FOR THE NOTES. 31. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS; SHEET 95: THE KEY PLAN SHOWS A SW8, BUT THERE ARE NO CALCULATIONS OR REFERENCES TO THAT WALL IN THE FOUNDATION DESIGN. VERIFY. 32. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS.
08/26/2013	RAY MAJUTA	ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL	REVIEW	Denied	T13CM04928 9100 S Houghton New Discount Tire 1. Concerning the 2011 IECC Interior Lighting Compliance Certificate, clarify how area classified under Workshop verses Automotive facility, if the Building Area Method used as suggested, the Watts/ft2 would be .9 rather than 1.2. Where does the 1.2 come from ? The calculation may have to be redone. 2. Sheet E3.0 shows correct fault current at Utility transformer to be 55,600 AIC, how does MDP value come to 42,000 AIC, and Panel values at 22,000 AIC? Provide fault current calculation on plan. 3. The City of Tucson requires compliance with it's 2012 Outdoor lighting Code.Must be shown through calculation. Can be obtained on City web page under Departments, Planning and Delevopment Services, Building Codes. Must choose loaction, option and lumen output total per size of acreage of property, (for all outdoor fixtures). Notice all outdoor lighting is limited to 3500K color rated temperature, one of the fixtures (spec sheets) can be 3000K or 5000K, please indicate on plan. 4.Sheet E2.0, only reference to Article 511 concerns raceway run overhead. Please address Article 511 on plan, Minor Repair, in reference to floor area, ceiling area, and ventilation. If ventilation de-classifies any area please indicate why and how. 5. Address 511.12, GFCI protection for circuits ? Ray T Majuta Elect Plan Review PDSD, C of Tucson 8/27/2013 Ray.Majuta@tucsonaz.gov 520/837/4988
08/29/2013	TERRY STEVENS	ZONING	REVIEW	Denied	Zoning cannot approve the building plan until the grading plan and the structural reviewers have approved the building portion.
08/29/2013	LAITH ALSHAMI	ENGINEERING	REVIEW	Denied	Laith Alshami, Engineering and Floodplain Review, 08/28/2013, Development Package has not been approved yet.

Final Status

Task End Date	Reviewer's Name	Type of Review	Description
10/02/2013	CPIERCE1	REJECT SHELF	Completed