Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI
Permit Number - T13CM04810
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/08/2013 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | see redlines on plans submitted. Numerous times on plans it notes Phoenix fire and scottsdale fire. Please remove. Look at notes to make sure the correct code sections and editions are quoted. Panic hardware needs to be added on door based on exit sign location.-krb |
| 08/08/2013 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Complete the Mechanical Compliance Certificate by checking the appropriate line items in Section 4, the Requirements Checklist. Supporting documentation shall be either on the drawings or in the project manual. The project manual shall be sealed per Section R4-30-304 of the Rules of the Board of Technical Registration. 2. Full compliance with the 2012 IECC requires that an "additional efficiency package option" be selected per Section C406. Identify which of the three options has been selected. 3. Provide the manufacturer's equipment data and installation instructions for the proposed pizza ovens. Reference: Sections 301 and 304.1, IMC 2012. 4. Verify the type of exhaust fans to be used for the two Type I hoods. The equipment schedule on sheet M3.1 calls for centrifugal utility sets but the food service shop drawings call out centrifugal up-blast fans. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012 and Section 506.3.13.3, IMC 2012. 5. Show that combustible materials (e.g. cabinets or a wood-framed wall) are not located within 18" of the Type I hood. Reference: Section 507.9, IMC 2012. 6. Verify the size of the exhaust duct to be used for the Type I hood located on the second floor (identified as the mezzanine on the mechanical drawings). The mechanical plan on sheet M1.1 calls for an 8" x 8" duct but the food service shop drawings call out an 8" x 7" duct. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012 7. Provide the manufacturer's listing information for the 6-burner range shown in the second floor kitchenette. Reference: Sections 301 and 308.2, IMC 2012. |
| 08/08/2013 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Revise the gas load for the water heater to reflect the manufacturer's specifications; the actual load is 199,999 BTUH for the specified water heater. 2. Clarify the nature of sink K51; it is not included in the food service equipment list. If it is a prep sink, where will the required hand sink be located? The Pima County Health Department requires the installation of a hand sink in each food preparation area. 3. Provide a design for the mounting shelf for the water heater along with structural calculations to show that the water heater is safely supported. Reference: Section 301.2, IPC 2012. 4. Show the size, route, and termination point for the condensate from the water heater flue. Reference: Section 314.1, IPC 2012. 5. Clarify the nature of the mop sink P-1; the fixture connection schedule notes that it is to be "wall hung" but the sink is specified as a floor-mounted unit. If the sink is to be elevated, the T&P relief line cannot terminate at that location. Reference: Section 504.6 (6), IPC 2012. 6. Provide a cleanout at the base of the new waste stack being installed for future use (Keynotes 10 and 11, P1.1). Reference: Section 708.3.4, IPC 2012. 7. Provide a cleanout sized for the 3" horizontal drain located at the bar area. Reference: Section 708.7, IPC 2012. 8. Provide a cleanout sized for the 3" grease waste located south of the 3-compartment sink near column line 2. Reference: Section 708.7, IPC 2012. Clarify the reason for using an indirect waste connection for the hand sink (K49) at the bar. Reference: Section 802.1, IPC 2012. |
| 08/08/2013 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/08/2013 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/13/2013 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: 3950 E. Irvington Road - New Metal Building. T13CM04810 Building Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 14, 2013 1. The building plans have been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. There are sheets provided that appear to show outdoor seating located within the right-of-way along Congress. A new development package will need to be submitted for review addressing this expansion of use area. Design Review Board (DRB) and Historic review are required. A temporary revolkalble easement (TRE) will be required for use of the COT ROW. 3. Until the development package has been submitted and approved the building plans cannot be approved. 4. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved development package. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 |
| 08/15/2013 | RONALD BROWN | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | SHEET A1.1 1. The EXITING PLAN is not complete. Please add addition information that shows the exit discharge to the exterior of the building and to the public right of way. 2. Please define the stair continuation upward. Where does it go, is it an occupied area and if so include the occupant load exit to this stair well. SHEET A3.0 3. Your notes are excessive. Please delete all those NOT USED and reduce the remaining notes to those that are relative to the construction only. 4. Make a graphic depiction difference of the existing construction elements to remain and the new construction elements being added especially the partitions. 5. At detail 3: a. Being totally enclosed, this second floor area does not meet the requirements of a mezzanine as per the 2012 IBC, Section 505.2.3. b. Access to the second floor is to be by stairs as per 2012 IBC, Section 1009.1. Ships ladders are for spaces as defined by Section 1009.14, not a second floor office area. c. Please provide wall sections of the office area atop the walk in cooler/freezer. Insure complete structural drawings and calculations are also provided. 6. Detail 2: a. Exit door 201a does not meet acceassible clearances as required by 2009 ICC A117.1, Section 404.2.3.2 b. Please confirm and show on drawings that the stair width is in compliance with Section 1009.4, exception 1, (minimum 3'-0" wide). c. Define the association of the area to where the stairs continue up. Include any additional occupancy exit load as required. 7. Detail 1: a. Exit door 102a does not meet accessible clearances as required by 2009 ICC A117.1, Section 404.2.3.2, b. Provide and show accessible seating in the dining and bar as required by the 2012 IBC, Section 1108.2 and 2009 ICC A117.7, Section 902. c. Provide for accessible service counters and food service lines (if included) as per 2009 ICC A117.1, Section 904. SHEET S3.0 8. Provide for the complete structural design and calculations for the office area added atop the new walk in cooler/freezer. SHEET S3.1 9. Note 9 indicates the addition of 2x10s attached to the existing rafters where as page 7 of the calculations says that the existing rafters are adequate to handel the new roof top HVAC and exhaust hood load. Please reconcile. 10. Please provide structural framing analysis of the existing rafters with the new roof top mounted HVAC equipment (HP1, HP2, HP3 and HP4) load. END OF FREVIEW |
| 08/16/2013 | RONALD BROWN | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Passed | |
| 08/19/2013 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | T13CM04810 268 E Congress Restaurant 1. City of Tucson has an Outdoor lighting Code by which all outdoor lighting must comply.The lumens output of lighting is restricted for fully shielded and unshielded types of fixtures. Usually 11,000 total lumens are allowed per acre for unshielded lighting ( which appears in the outdoor dining area), also the Rated Color Temperature is limited to 3500K for lamps and fixtures.The information supplied in the Light Fixture Schedule did not provide sufficient info in order to proceed. Please review the City of Tucson Outdoor Lighting Code found on City's web page and provide compliance data. Ray T Majuta Elect Plan Review DSD Tucson 8/20/2013 Ray.Majuta@tucsonaz.gov 520-837-4988 |
| 08/20/2013 | CPIERCE1 | WWM | REVIEW | Needs Review |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08/21/2013 | CPIERCE1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |