Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI
Permit Number - T13CM04636
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/30/2013 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Verify that the existing building sewer that will now be located within the new building addition is constructed of materials approved for use within a structure. Reference: Sections 702.2 and 703.4, IPC 2012. 2. Clarify how the installation of the drinking fountain, P-7, in room 123 relates to the existing waste stack. Reference: Section 911.1, IPC 2012. 3. Clarify keynote 8 on sheet P-2: where is the "restroom w/ shower" located and does the water heater serving the existing restrooms already have a recirculating pump? 4. Show how the flow rates for the recirculation hot water systems were determined (10 GPM in a ½" Type L copper pipe and 15 GPM in a ¾" Type L copper pipe?). 5. The plumbing schedule calls for 3/4" cold water and 3/4" hot water to be supplied to the waterless urinal - typo? 6. Provide roof drainage calculations and plans, including the primary and secondary roof drain leaders and their termination points. Clarify how the storm water from the new gutter and downspouts for the existing building is to be accommodated with the storm drains for the new building addition. Reference: Sections 1101, 1106 and 1108, IPC 2012. 7. Provide a design for the "spout" for the elevator roof. |
| 07/30/2013 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Complete the Envelope Compliance Certificate by checking the appropriate line items in Section 3, the Air Leakage, Component Certification, and Vapor Retarder Requirements. Supporting documentation shall be either on the drawings or in the project manual. The project manual shall be sealed per Section R4-30-304 of the Rules of the Board of Technical Registration. 2. Full compliance with the 2012 IECC requires that an "additional efficiency package option" be selected per Section C406. Identify which of the three options has been selected. 3. Provide auxiliary drain pans or secondary drain systems for fan coil units (see detail 113). Reference: Section 307.2.3 IMC 2012. 4. Revise the mechanical design as required to avoid using the corridor as a return air duct. Reference: Section 601.2, IMC 2006. 5. Provide the balancing data for the two exhaust grilles located in restrooms 118 and 119. 6. Clarify the balancing of ERV-1; it is scheduled to supply 1700 CFM and to exhaust 1700 CFM but only 1150 CFM of exhaust is identified on sheet M-1. 7. Detail 113 refers to seismic bracing; if this is part of this activity, provide the referenced specification. |
| 07/30/2013 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Denied | Provide a site drawing that shows the location of the new water meter and the existing reduced pressure backflow prevention assembly. |
| 07/31/2013 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/01/2013 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/08/2013 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SHEET C-1; APPLICABLE CODES: ADD THE 2009 ICC/ANSI A117.1 TO THE LIST FOR ACCESSIBILITY. 2. SHEET C-1; SPECIAL INSPECTIONS: REVISE THE SHEET NUMBER. 3. SHEET C-1; INDEX OF DRAWINGS: A SHEET E-1 (ELEVATOR DETAILS) WAS NOT LOCATED IN THE SET. VERIFY. 4. SHEET A-1; FLOOR PLAN: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE THE KEYNOTE IDENTIFIERS ON THE PLAN. 5. SHEET A-1; DEMOLITION FLOOR PLAN: KEYNOTE 5 WAS NOT LOCATED ON THE PLAN. VERIFY. 6. SHEET A-2; FLOOR PLAN: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE THE WALL IDENTIFIERS AND KEYNOTE IDENTIFIERS ON THE PLAN. 7. SHEETS A-2 AND A-3; FLOOR PLAN: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE THE INTERIOR WALL ELEVATION INDICATORS, SECTION CUTS, AND KEYNOTE IDENTIFIERS. 8. SHEET A-2; FLOOR PLAN: KEYNOTES 16 AND 24 WERE NOT LOCATED ON THE PLAN. VERIFY. 9. SHEETS A-2 AND A-3; KEYNOTE 3: VERIFY THE IBC SECTION REFERENCE IS CORRECT. 10. SHEET A-3; ROOM FINISH SCHEDULE: ADD/REVISE THE SCHEDULE FOR THE ABBREVIATIONS VN, CT, AND CL (NOT SHOWN WITH THE OTHER ABBREVIATIONS). 11. SHEET A-3; FLOOR PLAN: SEVERAL PLAN KEYNOTES WERE NOT LOCATED ON THE PLAN. ADD KEYNOTE IDENTIFIERS OR REMOVE THE KEYNOTES AS REQUIRED. 12. SHEET A-3; FLOOR PLAN: ADD THE GRID CALL-OUTS ON THE PLAN. BETWEEN GRIDS 5 AND 13, THE PLAN INDICATES 7 WINDOWS (W01), WHILE THE ELEVATION INDICATES 6. CLARIFY. 13. SHEET A-5: IS THERE AN UPPER LEVEL DIMENSION PLAN? VERIFY. 14. SHEET A-6: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE THE KEYNOTE IDENTIFIERS ON THE PLAN. 15. SHEET A-6; SOUTH ELEVATION: ADD THE GRID CALL-OUTS ON THE ELEVATION. IT APPEARS A DOUBLE DOOR IS INDICATED NEAR GRID 18 ON THE ELEVATION, BUT THE PLAN SHOWS A SINGLE DOOR. CLARIFY. 16. SHEET A-7; ELEVATION 4: IN THE FIRST ELEVATION, PROVIDE THE HEIGHT OF THE HORIZONTAL GRAB BAR ABOVE THE FLOOR. 17. SHEET A-9; STAIR SECTIONS: THERE ARE SEVERAL DETAILS 4/A9 THAT SHOULD BE REFERENCED AS 5/A9. VERIFY. 18. SHEET A-9; STAIR SECTIONS: THE SECTION ON THE RIGHT REFERENCES DETAIL 6/A5. REVISE THAT REFERENCE. 19. SHEET S1.0; STRUCTURAL NOTES (FOUNDATIONS): VERIFY THE IBC SECTION REFERENCE IN NOTE 1 IS CORRECT. 20. SHEET S1.5 (DETAIL 41); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS: NO CALCULATIONS WERE FOUND FOR THE LIGHT POLE FOUNDATION. ARE THERE LIGHT POLES ON THIS PROJECT? VERIFY. 21. SHEET S2.0; FOUNDATION PLAN: DETAIL 103 IS CUT AT BOTH F2 AND F6 FOOTINGS (GRIDS 32-I AND 1-I). THERE ARE DIFFERENT TYPES OF FOOTINGS, BUT USE THE SAME DETAIL ON THE PLANS. CLARIFY. IS THERE A DETAIL DEPICTING AN F6 FOOTING? VERIFY. 22. SHEET S2.0 (FOUNDATION PLAN); SHEET S4.0 (DETAIL 102): THE DETAIL 102 INDICATES IT IS AT A DOOR OPENING, BUT THE DETAIL CUT ON THE PLAN IS AT A WALL (NEAR GRIDS I AND 0). CLARIFY. 23. SHEET S2.0; FOUNDATION PLAN: THE PLAN TITLE INDICATES "PARTIAL FOUNDATION PLAN". IS THIS PARTIAL? VERIFY. 24. SHEET S3.0; FLOOR FRAMING PLAN NOTES: NOTE 1 IS NOT SHOWN ON THE FRAMING PLAN (ERRONIOUSLY DENOTED AS NOTE 2 IN TWO LOCATIONS). REVISE. 25. SHEET S3.0; FLOOR FRAMING PLAN: PLAN NOTES 4 AND 7 WERE NOT LOCATED ON THE PLAN. VERIFY. 26. SHEET S3.1; ROOF FRAMING PLAN: WHY AREN'T SHEARWALLS LOCATED ON THIS PLAN SIMILAR TO THE LAYOUT ON THE FLOOR FRAMING PLAN? SHOW THE SHEARWALLS ON THE ROOF FRAMING PLAN PER THE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS. 27. SHEET S3.1; ROOF FRAMING PLAN: INCLUDE THE GRID CALL-OUTS ON THE PLAN. 28. SHEET S3.1; ROOF FRAMING PLAN NOTES: PLAN NOTE 3 WAS NOT LOCATED ON THE PLAN. VERIFY. 29. SHEET S3.1; ROOF FRAMING PLAN NOTES: PLAN NOTE 10 WAS NOT SHOWN IN THE NOTES (BUT IS ON THE PLAN). VERIFY. 30. SHEET S5.1; DETAILS 228, 229, AND 230: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE THE DETAIL NOTES. 31. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS; SHEET 7: FOR BEAM DB6, THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE TO SEE THE PRINTOUT. HOWEVER, THERE IS NO PRINTOUT IN THIS SUBMITTAL FOR DB6. CLARIFY. 32. GENERAL: PROVIDE A SITE PLAN IN THIS PROJECT SET PER THE IBC SECTION 107.2.5. 33. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 08/13/2013 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | T13CM04636 7525 E Speedway Desert Christrian School Addition 1. 2012 City of Tucson Outdoor Lighting Code, Section 402.1, requires all outdoor lamps and fixtures not to exceed 3500K color temperature,. Two of the fixtures per spec sheets over, X3 and T4 . 2. Provide locations of Lighting control panel and FACP. Ray T Majuta Elect Plan Review PDSD, C of Tucson 8/13/2013 Ray.Majuta@tucsonaz.gov |
| 08/19/2013 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | Zoning cannot approve the building plan until the site plan has been completed and building reviewers have completed thier review. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08/21/2013 | CPIERCE1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |