Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI
Permit Number - T13CM04414
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/23/2013 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide complete plumbing plans for the modifications to the building. How will the plumbing for the four third-floor guest rooms that are located above the second-floor rooms that are being removed be rerouted or otherwise modified? How is the plumbing for the two restrooms located to the west of the breakfast area being modified? How is the plumbing for the exercise room being modified? Show how the "existing" women's restroom was able to glaciate nine feet north of its current location? Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. 2. Verify the size of the proposed roof drains (i.e. what is the area of the roof and sidewalls being drained?). Show how the roof drain and the overflow drain are being terminated. |
| 07/23/2013 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide complete mechanical plans for the modifications to the building. Include ventilation requirements for the exercise room. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012 and Section 403.3, IMC 2012. 2. A condensing unit is shown on the roof of the new covered entry; what is its purpose? Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. 3. Provide the types and quantities of chemicals to be stored in the new chemical storage room. Reference: Section 502.8.1, IMC 2012. |
| 07/23/2013 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/24/2013 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/29/2013 | RONALD BROWN | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | SHEET G1 1. Minimum City of Tucson actual (not font) lettering size, both upper and lower case, is 3/32". Please revise all sheets that are not in compliance with this standard and resubmit. SHEETS D1, A1 AND A2 2. The new open, winder stair from the 2nd level to the new 1st floor lobby area was originaly designed as an enclosed, rated exit stairwell. Please provide a code analyis, on the drawings, that show compliance for this enclosure to be negated. SHEET A3 3. Provide detectable warning strips at both ends of the marked crossing as per ICC A 117.1, Sections 406.12, 13 and 14 as applicable. 4. Insure that there is an accessible serving counter in the Serving Room as per ICC A117.1, Section 904. SHEET A4 5. At detail B: the new toilet room is not accessible as the lavatory is encroaching in the required water closet clearance. 6. Door 2 does not have clearance for accessibility as required by ICC A117.1, Section 404.2.3.2. The new column restricts the clearances required. END OF REVIEW |
| 07/29/2013 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Building plan will be approved upon approval of a Development Plan Package due to site changes. The project is proposing a new porte-cochère along the southwest side of the project. The new porte-cochère is taking away 3 existing parking spaces which need to be accounted for in parking calculations. PAAL widths and heights need to be verified. Provide a new DP Package for a site review and once all items have been addressed ENG will approve the building plan. JG |
| 08/02/2013 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | There are no electrical plans submitted, if no electrical work is to be preformed please indicate on plan. Ray T Majuta DSD, Tucson Elect Plan Review 8/02/2013 Ray.majuta@tucsonaz.gov |
| 08/05/2013 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: T13CM04414 102 N Alvernon Way LA Quinta Hotel Remodel, New Construction and Site Changes TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 5, 2013 DUE DATE: August 08, 2013 COMMENTS: 01. Zoning has reviewed the plans but cannot approve them at this time. A new development package site plan must be submitted to address the site changes being made as well as the location of the new tower. The tower is proposed at a height of 48 feet. Based on the location and proximity to the existing and possible future curb location it appears that a Board of Adjustment variance will be required for the building setback of the proposed tower. 02. Additional comments on the building plans will forthcoming based on the submittal and review of the development package site plan. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: New development Package Site Plan and Elevation drawings |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09/18/2013 | CPIERCE1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |