Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI
Permit Number - T13CM04150
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/09/2013 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/09/2013 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/09/2013 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SHEET A-0; BUILDING CODE DATA: CURRENT CODES ARE THE 2012 IBC, 2012 IMC, 2012 IPC, AND THE 2011 NEC. ADD THE 2009 ICC/ANSI A117.1 ACCESSIBILITY CODE TO THIS LIST. 2. SHEET A-1.1 (KEYED NOTES); SHEET A-8 (DETAIL 9): NOTE 10 INDICATES THE NEW WATER HEATER TO BE MOUNTED ABOVE ON WALL. DETAIL 9 ON A-8 DOES NOT INDICATE HOW THE WATER HEATER IS SUPPORTED. PROVIDE A DETAIL FOR THAT SUPPORT. 3. SHEET A-1.1 (KEYED NOTES); SHEET A-7 (PARTITION TYPES): KEYED NOTE 14 INDICATES NEW WALLS WILL EXTEND TO THE BOTTOM OF THE ROOF DECK, BUT NO PARTITION DETAIL ON SHEET A-7 INDICATES THAT (WALLS SHOWN ENDING JUST ABOVE THE CEILING). CLARIFY. 4. SHEET A-1.1; KEYED NOTES: NOTE 16 WAS NOT LOCATED ON THE PLANS. VERIFY. 5. SHEET A-1.1; ACCESSIBILITY NOTES: ADD A REFERENCE TO SHEET A-4 ON THE ACCESSIBILITY NOTES. 6. SHEET A-7; KEYED NOTES: NOTES 9, 16, AND 18 WERE NOT LOCATED ON THE DETAILS. VERIFY. 7. SHEET A-7; KEYED NOTES: NOTES 20 AND 21 ARE INDICATED ON THE DETAILS BUT ARE NOT SHOWN IN THE KEYED NOTES. VERIFY. 8. SHEET A-8; DETAIL 7: A NOTE INDICATES A 5/8" DIAMETER ROD IS HUNG FROM THE STRUCTURE ABOVE. PROVIDE A DETAIL INDICATING HOW THE ROD IS HUNG AT THE STRUCTURE ABOVE. 9. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 07/09/2013 | ERIC NEWCOMB | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Passed | |
| 07/10/2013 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Revise the sequence of operation for the restroom exhaust fan so that all of the air supplied to the restrooms will be exhausted (i.e. the exhaust fan shall run whenever the HVAC system supplies air to the restroom). The exhausted air from the restrooms shall be limited to no more than 10% of any subsequent supply air stream. Reference: Section 403.2.1 (4), IMC 2012. 2. Provide structural calculations and details to show that the Type I hood is supported from the building structure in accordance with Section 507.6, IMC 2006. Reference: Section 302.1, IMC 2012. 3. Verify that the proposed Type I hood is equipped to automatically start the hood exhaust fan when cooking operations commence. Reference: Section 507.2.1.1, IMC 2012. 4. Clarify the exhaust duct dimensions and the exhaust flow rate for the Type I hood. The exhaust duct is shown variously as 12"x 12" and 10" x 12"; the exhaust flow rate is shown as both 1380 CFM and 1600 CFM. Clarify keynotes 15 and 16 on sheet M-3. |
| 07/10/2013 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | T13CM04150 3901 E Grant Rd 1. See Mechanical Plan Review conserning switching of exhaust fan in restroom, connot only be energized along with light. 2. New 400 amp service, identify new conductors and conduits and how tied into existing service.Show total load on service including this space. Show location of main service. 3 Provide Fault Current values at new 400 amp service and panels. 4. The single line diagram is incorrect, the new 400 amp service feeds a 100 amp panel A then the 200 amp panel B ? 5. Indicate plan to be installed by 2011 NEC not 2005. Ray T Majuta Elect Plan Review PDSD, Tucson 7/10/2013 Ray.Majuta@tucsonaz.gov |
| 07/10/2013 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/10/2013 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/10/2013 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Needs Review | |
| 07/17/2013 | CPIERCE1 | WWM | REVIEW | Needs Review |