Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESIDENTIAL - BLDG/ZONING/ENGINE/WWM
Permit Number - T13CM03400
Review Name: RESIDENTIAL - BLDG/ZONING/ENGINE/WWM
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/19/2013 | MICHAEL ST. PAUL | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | The Mercado District approval stamp must be on all sheets of the plan. The easements must be delineated and dimensioned, with the purose of the easements stated on the plot plan for each lot. The easement must be recorded for each lot and the recording documentation must be provided and referenced on each plot plan. |
| 07/19/2013 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | July 10, 2013 Provide dimension of the adjacent right of way including sidewalk and curb locations. Provide dimensions from the curb access ramp to the proposed driveway. There must be a minimum of 4 feet between the ends of the curb transitions for the adjacent aprons. |
| 07/19/2013 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Mitigation for removal of Native Mequite within ROW required . |
| 07/23/2013 | KEN BROUILLETTE | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/23/2013 | CLAYTON TREVILLYAN | BUILDING-RESIDENTIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS Date: 7-25-13 Activity: T13CM03400 Address: 902 W. Calle de los Higos Applicant: Innovative Living Design & Development This letter reflects comments to be addressed. The purpose of this review is to verify compliance to the 2012 International Residential Code with local amendments. In order to facilitate a shorter back check time, we request that you please provide two complete sets of revised plans and calculations, along with a written response to each of the noted items indicating action taken. Other comment references may be derived from additional codes and standards adopted by The City of Tucson. All features have been checked only to the extent allowed by the submittals provided for review. All portions of this project are assumed to meet other departmental requirements, conditions, and concerns before permit approval. PLUMBING PLAN: 1. Pressure and temperature relief valve for the water heater may terminate no more than 6 inches above the grade, P2803.6.1. Note on plan say 6' above grade. 2. The kitchen sink, laundry sink, and garage sink are not considered gray water fixtures. Adjust the waste layout accordingly. 3. Provide both gray water AND black water discharges from the clothes washing machine. 4. The Tucson Water policy adopted 7/13/12 limits the maximum demand for water meters. Specify the size of the proposed water meter. 5. Specify the maximum developed length of water line from the meter the furthest appliance served, and the lowest available working pressure after pressure loss calculation for elevation, P2903.7. 6. Isometric drawings of DWV systems are required for multiple story buildings. 7. Provide a gas line isometric and size the supply pipe for the connected demand. Include the length of line and BTU demand for each appliance, size of each branch, total demand, and total developed length from meter to the most remote appliance on the system, G2413.1, Table G2413.4 (1). MECHANICAL PLAN: 8. Provide Manual J/S/D calculations for the forced air unit in accordance with M1401.3, M1601.1. ELECTRICAL PLAN: 9. Specify faceplate grounding per E4001.11.1. 10. Specify tamper resistant receptacles per E4002.14. 11. Exterior outlets at grade level shall be provided at both the front and back of the dwelling, E3901.7. These outlets shall be GFCI protected E3902.3. 12. Provide floor receptacles at spaces in exterior walls occupied by fixed panels of glass so that no point is more than 6 feet from an outlet, E3901.2.1, E3901.2.2(2). If you have any questions please contact: Clayton Trevillyan 520.837.4913 Residential Plan Review |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07/26/2013 | CPIERCE1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |