Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI
Permit Number - T13CM03182
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/06/2013 | KEN BROUILLETTE | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | UPDATE TO 2012 IFC |
| 06/07/2013 | RONALD BROWN | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | GENERAL 1. The City of Tucson lettering size standard is 3/32" actual size for both upper and lower case. Please revise all sheets not complying to this standard and resubmit. SHEET T001 2. Up date the accessibility code to the 2009 Edition, ICC A117.1. SHEET A101 3. The fence gate door number 4 must have panic hardware as it is on the required egress for emergency exiting. SHEET S0.0 4. Provide certification of the special inspectors as listed in the spacial inspection requirements. END OF REVIEW |
| 06/11/2013 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Building plan will be reviewed and approved upon submittal and approval of a development plan package due to all site work being proposed. JG |
| 06/11/2013 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: dd's Discounts T13CM03182 Building Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 11, 2013 1. The building plans have been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning can not approve the building plans until the development package has been submitted and approved. 3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved development package. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 |
| 06/14/2013 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Coordinate the plumbing fixture specifications with the architect; some of the specifications on sheet A401 do not agree with the specifications on sheet P2 (and the 3.5 GPF flush valves on A401 violate Arizona State law). 2. Clarify the design for the mounting shelf for the water heater to show that the water heater will be safely supported from the building structure (e.g. what constitutes a "bracketed shelf", how the mounting shelf is connected to the wall, etc.). Reference: Section 301.2, IPC 2012. 3. The submitted water calculations show a total of 43 water fixture units which yields a demand of approximately 47 GPM. Revise the size of the existing 1" reduced pressure backflow preventer and the existing 1" pipe from the meter to the new 2" pipe being installed with the tenant improvement. Undersized pipe and valves can result in water velocities greater than that recommended by the manufacturer (e.g. limit the water velocity to less than 8 FPS for copper, PEX, or CPVC piping; manufacturer's typical maximum recommended flow rate for reduced pressure backflow preventers is 7.5 FPS). Reference: Section 303.2, IPC 2012. 4. The specified bottom-fed water heater requires a vacuum relief valve. Install the proposed vacuum relief valve per the manufacturer's listing information, i.e. with no valves located between the vacuum relief valve and the water heater. Reference: Sections 303.2 and 504.2, IPC 2012. |
| 06/17/2013 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Denied | The submitted water calculations show a total of 43 water fixture units which yields a demand of approximately 47 GPM (Table E103.3(3), IPC 2012). Tucson Water limits a 1" meter to a maximum demand of 37.5 GPM. Provide a letter from Tucson Water confirming that the use of a 1" water meter will be allowed for this project. |
| 06/18/2013 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | T13CM03182 3838 N Oracle Rd dd's Discounts 1. Sheet E5.0, provide the size of conductors and conduit sets between utility transformer and new 400 a CT. 2. Sheet E5.0 provide a Fault Current Analysis begining at CT on through to all panels. indicate if Series Rating Systems or Fully Rated Panels and Breakers to be used. 3. Sheet E5.0, the va values in Panel HA do not match the values in MDP for Panel HA. Ray Majuta Electrical Plan Review PDSD, Tucson 6/19/2013 Ray.Majuta@tucsonaz.gov 520-837-4988 |
| 06/18/2013 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Clarify where Expansion Area E has been included in the ventilation calculations. 2. Clarify the sequence of operation for EF-1 (restroom exhaust fan); show that the operation of the fan will comply with the requirements of Section 403.2.1 (4), IMC 2012 (i.e. the exhaust fan will operate whenever HVAC air is being supplied to the restrooms). |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07/17/2013 | SHANAE POWELL | APPROVAL SHELF | Completed |
| 07/17/2013 | CPIERCE1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |