Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T13CM03176
Parcel: 14118008G

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW

Permit Number - T13CM03176
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
05/31/2013 RAY MAJUTA ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied T13CM03176

1. Change cover sheet, also indicate on electrical sheets, currently under 2011 NEC and 2012 IECC.

2. Provide a calculation showing compliance with City of Tucson Outdoor Lighting Code 2012(Ord # 10963). Can be found on City Web Page by going to ,Departments, Development Services, Codes and Ordinances, to Outdoor Lighting Code.

3. Sheet E 101, there is no switch in switchbank for L26 fixture shown going to "n''.

4. Sheet E 601 in the SES box, the reference is to go to E5.0 for grounding, should be E 400 detail 1. Also this detail shows underground metallic piping,should be all metallic piping.


Ray T Majuta
Electrical Plan Review
PDSD, Tucson
5031/2013
Ray.Majuta@tucsonaz.gov
06/04/2013 ERIC NEWCOMB BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. SHEET G-001; CODE ANALYSIS: REVISE THE 2006 IBC, IEBC, UPC, IMC, IFC, IECC, AND IFGC TO THE 2012 EDITIONS, AND VERIFY THE 2012 REQUIREMENTS ARE MET.
2. SHEET G-001; CODE ANALYSIS: REMOVE THE 2003 ADA REFERENCE, AND REVISE THE ICC/ANSI EDITION TO THE 2009.
3. SHEET A-406: PROVIDE A DETAIL ON THIS SHEET INDICATING THE LOCATION AND LENGTH OF THE REAR WALL GRAB BAR PER THE ICC/ANSI FIGURE 604.5.2, OR REFERENCE SHEET A-503.
4. SHEETS A-406 AND A-503: PROVIDE ON THESE SHEETS THE WATER CLOSET SEAT HEIGHT PER THE ICC/ANSI FIGURE 604.4.
5. SHEET A-407 (DETAIL 8); SHEET S-400 (DETAIL 12): THE WALL HEIGHT, VERTICAL REINFORCING, AND FOOTING SIZE DIFFERS IN THE TWO DETAILS. COORDINATE.
6. SHEET A-408: REFERENCE DEVELOPMENT PLAN DP13-0093 FOR COMMENTS ON THIS SHEET.
7. SHEET A-502; ELEVATION 9: PROVIDE THE DETAILS FOR THE ELECTRIC WATER HEATER SUPPORT ON THE DRAWINGS.
8. SHEETS S-000 AND S-001: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE THE NOTES.
9. SHEET S-100; FOUNDATION NOTE 12: A REFERENCE TO 1/S-001 IS MADE FOR A FOOTING REQUIREMENT. REVISE THE REFERENCE.
10. SHEET S-101; ROOF TRUSS NOTES: REVISE THE IBC REFERENCE IN NOTE 6.
11. SHEET S-101 (ROOF FRAMING PLAN); SHEET S-500 (DETAIL 5): DETAIL 5 ON GRID C DOES NOT INDICATE THE 6X6 AT THE HOOD HANGER AS INDICATED ON THE PLAN. SHOW THAT MEMBER ON DETAIL 5.
12. SHEETS S-300, S-400, AND S-500: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE THE NOTES.
13. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS; PAGE 1: THE CITY OF TUCSON AMENDMENTS TO THE 2012 IBC INCLUDE THE ADDITION OF SECTION 1609.5.1.1 CONCERNING UPLIFT RESISTANCE TO MINIMIZE MICROBURST EFFECTS USING ONE OF THE TWO METHODS LISTED. VERIFY THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS SECTION HAVE BEEN MET.
14. GENERAL: ALL DEFERRED SUBMITTALS MUST BE APPROVED IN WRITING BY RON BOOSE (BUILDING OFFICIAL) BEFORE THOSE SUBMITTALS WILL BE REVIEWED. RON.BOOSE@TUCSONAZ.GOV.
15. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. NO SUBSEQUENT REVIEWS WILL BE PERFORMED UNTIL WRITTEN RESPONSES ARE RECEIVED.
06/05/2013 TERRY STEVENS ZONING REVIEW Denied Zoning cannot approve the building plan until the development package for this site has been approved
06/05/2013 ERIC NEWCOMB COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING Approved
06/07/2013 LAITH ALSHAMI ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied Laith Alshami, Engineering and Floodplain Review, 06/07/2013,

The plan shall be recommended for approval after the DP is approved.
06/10/2013 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Verify the energy code analysis for the building envelope. The exterior walls (sheet A302) indicate cavity insulation equal to R19 but the envelope compliance certificate shows cavity insulation equal to R21. The glazing calculations (e.g. projection factors) do not agree with those shown on the envelope compliance certificate. Coordinate the building components used in the analysis with those shown on the drawing and the attached calculations. Reference: Section C303.1, IECC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson.
2. Complete the Mechanical Compliance Certificate by checking the applicable line items in Section 4, the Requirements Checklist for the mechanical equipment that are supported by the project specifications.
3. Coordinate the descriptions of the mechanical equipment shown on the Mechanical Compliance Certificate with the equipment schedules on the drawings (e.g. the EER values shown for A/C units AC-2 and AC-3).
4. Provide calculations demonstrating adequate ventilation using the current code (i.e. the submitted calculations are based on the 2006 IMC, not the 2012 IMC). Identify the individual zones being ventilated per Table 403.3, IMC 2012. The drawings indicate a cafeteria/fast food establishment, not restaurant dining and an unventilated closet is not a storage area. Reference: Section 403.2, IMC 2012.
5. Verify that the proposed Type I hood is equipped to automatically start the hood exhaust fan when cooking operations commence. Reference: Section 507.2.1.1, IMC 2012.
06/10/2013 RMYERS1 WATER REVIEW Approved
06/10/2013 RICK MYERS PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. See sheet G 001- Code Schedule. 2006 UPC with ammendments. See sheet P101- Grease Interceptor Schedule refers to the 2006 IPC. Since January first of 2013, all plans submitted to the City of Tucson to be reviewed under the 2012 IPC. UPC plans may be reviewed with a petition of appeal from the codes administrator.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
07/19/2013 CPIERCE1 REJECT SHELF Completed