Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T13CM02638
Parcel: 14044009K

Address:
7632 S WILMOT RD

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW

Permit Number - T13CM02638
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
05/17/2013 MARTIN BROWN FIRE REVIEW Denied Unable to approve until Development Plan has been approved. Fire flow from hydrants and /or distance from hydrants may indicate requirement for fire sprinklers. Please insure hydrant locations are indicated on site plan, along with fire flow requirements from annex B of the 2012 IFC. A flow test should be performed and results listed on site plan.
05/23/2013 ERIC NEWCOMB BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. SHEET T1; APPLICABLE CODES: THE CITY OF TUCSON CURRENTLY USES THE 2012 EDITIONS OF THE IBC, IMC, IPC, AND IECC, AND THE 2011 EDITION OF THE NEC. REVISE AND ENSURE REQUIREMENTS OF THE NEW CODES HAVE BEEN MET.
2. SHEET T1; APPLICABLE CODES: ADD THE 2009 EDITION OF THE ICC/ANSI A117.1 ACCESSIBILITY CODE TO THIS LIST.
3. SHEET T1; BUILDING DATA: UNDER 'SPRINKLER', REVISE THE 2009 IBC REFERENCE OF SECTION 903.2.1.2 TO THE 2012 SECTION.
4. SHEET T1; EXIT REQUIREMENTS: REVISE THE MAXIMUM TRAVEL DISTANCE TABLE REFERENCE TO THE 2012 IBC REFERENCE (TABLE 1016.2).
5. SHEET A3; ROOF PLAN: AT EXHAUST FAN 3, A KEY NOTE 17 IS INDICATED. REVISE.
6. SHEET A5 (INTERIOR ELEVATION 2); SHEET A6.1 (DETAIL 2): THE INTERIOR ELEVATION INDICATES DETAIL 2/A6.1 ON THE LEFT SIDE. THAT DETAIL DOES NOT MATCH WITH THE ELEVATION. VERIFY.
7. SHEET A8.2; DETAIL 6: PROVIDE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS FOR THE AWNINGS.
8. SHEET A8.3; DETAIL 3: IS THE 3'-0 1/8" DIMENSION CORRECT? VERIFY.
9. SHEET A8.3; DETAIL 6: IS THE 7'-10" DIMENSION CORRECT? VERIFY.
10. SHEETS S-1 AND S-2; PLANS: ADD NORTH ARROWS TO THE PLANS.
11. SHEET S-2 (FRAMING PLAN); SHEET S-4 (DETAILS 2 AND 6); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS: THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE THE TYPICAL HEADER IN THE DINING ROOM PER DETAILS 2/S-4 AND 6/S-4 TO BE 3-2X6, AND THE FRAMING NOTES ON SHEET S-2 INDICATE HEADERS IN 2X6 WALLS TO BE 3-2X6. ADD A NOTE ON THE R7 KEYED NOTE THAT THE (3) 1 3/4" X 9 1/4" MICROLAMS ARE HEADERS AT THAT LOCATION ONLY.
12. SHEET S-2; KEYED NOTES: NOTE R6 WAS NOT LOCATED ON THE PLAN. VERIFY.
13. SHEET S-2 (FRAMING PLAN); SHEET S-5 (DETAIL 5): DETAIL 5 INDICATES THE GLU-LAM BEAM LOCATED AT THE BACK WALL OF THE TOWER, WHILE THE FRAMING PLAN INDICATES THE TOWER EXTENDS WEST OF THE GLU-LAM BEAM. CLARIFY.
14. SHEET S-2; FRAMING NOTES: NOTE 2 REFERENCES THE IBC TABLE 2306.4.1 FOR WOOD STRUCTURAL PANELS. REVISE THE REFERENCE TO THE 2012 IBC.
15. SHEET S-4 (DETAIL 5); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (LOW HEADER AT 5/S-4): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE 3-2X8 HEADER, BUT THE PLAN AND DETAIL SHOW NO HEADER. CLARIFY.
16. SHEET S-4; DETAIL 2: A NOTE AT THE CANOPY INDICATES TO SEE THE MANUFACTURER'S SHOP DRAWINGS FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES. ARE THOSE TO BE A DEFERRED SUBMITTAL?
17. SHEET S-4; DETAIL 3: A NOTE AT THE OUTSIDE WALL INDICATES DOUBLE 2X4 FURRING LAID FLAT AT 24" CENTERS. HOWEVER, THE DETAIL DOES NOT SHOW THE DOUBLE 2X4 LAID FLAT. CLARIFY.
18. SHEET S-7; GEOTECHNICAL REPORT: PROVIDE THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT (ONE COPY) FOR REVIEW.
19. SHEET S-7; STRUCTURAL DESIGN CRITERIA: THIS DRAWING INDICATES THE APPLICABLE CODE AS THE 2006 IBC. REVISE AND ENSURE REQUIREMENTS OF THE NEW CODES HAVE BEEN MET.
20. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS: MANY CALCULATION SHEETS INDICATE THE GOVERNING DESIGN CODE AS THE 2006 IBC. REVISE THOSE CALCULATIONS AS REQUIRED TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE 2012 IBC.
21. GENERAL: DARKEN THE LETTERING ON ALL SHEETS SO IT IS LEGIBLE.
22. GENERAL: ALL PROFESSIONAL SEALS ON THE DRAWINGS MUST BE DATED, AND THE LICENSE EXPIRATION DATE MUST BE INCLUDED.
23. GENERAL: THE LENGTH OF THE TYPICAL STUD WALL ANCHOR BOLTS WAS NOT LOCATED ON THE PLANS, NOTES, OR DETAILS. VERIFY.
24. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. NO SUBSEQUENT REVIEWS WILL BE PERFORMED WITHOUT THOSE RESPONSES.
06/03/2013 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. The International Plumbing Code, 2012, is the controlling code for this structure, not the 2006 International Plumbing Code. Reference: Section 101, IBC 2012.
2. Provide water pressure and water pipe sizing calculations. Reference: Sections 604.1 and 604.3, IPC 2012.
3. Verify that the tempered water for the lavatories and public hand-washing sinks is being provided using approved devices conforming to ASSE 1070. Reference: Sections 416.5 and 607.1.2, IPC 2012.
4. Provide separate indirect waste pipes for each compartment of the 3-compartment sink to protect against cross-contamination or fouling. Reference: Sections 801.2 and 802.1.8, IPC 2012.
5. Provide a cleanout at the base of the roof drain stack prior to connection to a horizontal storm drain. Reference: Sections 708.3.4 and 1101.8, IPC 2012.
6. Coordinate the connection of the primary roof drain leader with the civil plans; keynote #9 on sheet P3 refers to the civil plans for continuation but no storm drain sewers are shown connecting to the building storm drain.
7. Verify the natural gas input for the three rooftop units; the mechanical plans show the three units each requiring 180 MBH.
06/03/2013 RAY MAJUTA ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied T13CM02638

1. Indicate on cover and electrical sheets current code is 2011 NEC and 2012 IECC.
2. As per City of Tucson Submittal Requirements provide a calculation showing compliance with 2012 Tucson Outdoor Lighting Code.
3.Provide a fault current calculation , show values at CT,MDP and Panels A,B and C. If panel values above 10K AIC indicate how they are to be brought to 10K Aic or below.
4. MDP is to be Nema 3R as main disconnect ?
5. See Mechanical Plans Examiner comments on operation sequence of exhaust fan in rest rooms.Per 2012 IMC 403.2.

Ray Majuta
Elect Plan Review
PDSD, Tucson
6/2/2013
Ray.Majuta@tucsonaz.gov
06/03/2013 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Denied 1. Reduced pressure backflow prevention assemblies are required to be installed directly after the water meter for buildings that have food service facilities and in locations accessible to Tucson Water (not in the building, as shown on sheet P1). Reference: Chapter XXVII, Article V, Section 27-72, the Tucson Code, http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/sites/default/files/water/docs/backflow-ordinance.pdf
2. Coordinate the design of the water service to the building; the civil design (sheet C7) shows a separate water meter being installed for irrigation use at the property line, not a branch from the water distribution system from within the building.
06/03/2013 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. The International Mechanical Code, 2012, is the controlling code for this structure, not the 2006 International Mechanical Code. Reference: Section 101, IBC 2012.
2. Provide information on the sequence of operation for the restroom exhaust fans to show that all of the air supplied to the restrooms will be exhausted with no more than 10% exhausted air being recirculated. Reference: Section 403.2.1 (4), IMC 2012.
3. The occupant load used for calculating the minimum required ventilation is to be based on Table 403.3, IMC 2012 or an approved engineering analysis of the specific occupancy type. Submit an appeal to the building official if you wish to provide an alternative analysis (see http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/files/dsd/Forms-Fees-Maps/Appeal_form4.pdf). Reference: Section 403.3, IMC 2012.
4. The ventilation calculations in the 2012 IMC are radically different from the 2006 IMC calculations; revise the calculations and resubmit. Reference: Section 403.3, IMC 2012.
5. The shop drawings for the broiler hood (EF-1) indicate an exhaust duct that is 7.5" x 7.5" instead of the 8" diameter duct shown on the design drawings. Similarly, the griddle hood (EF-2) and the fryer hood (EF-3) shop drawings have different exhaust duct sizes compared to the design drawings. Verify that these changes will not void the manufacturer's listing for the hoods. Reference: Sections 304.1 and 507.1, IMC 2012.
6. Show that the outlet of fans EF-2 and EF-3 comply with the requirements of Section 506.5.5, IMC 2012.
7. The 2012 International Energy Compliance Code is the relevant energy code for this project. Revise the envelope and the mechanical compliance certificates using the correct code.
06/10/2013 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Denied PDSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: Carl's Jr @ 7632 S. Wilmot
T13CM02638
Building Plan (1st Review)

TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 10, 2013

1. The building plans have been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed.

2. Zoning can not approve the building plans until the development package has been approved.

3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved development package. Additional comments may be forthcoming.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956
06/12/2013 ELIZABETH LEIBOLD ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied Denied until Development Package is approved.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
11/12/2013 SHANAE POWELL OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
11/12/2013 CPIERCE1 REJECT SHELF Completed