Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Permit Number - T13CM01918
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/09/2013 | KEN BROUILLETTE | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | PLEASE UPDATE PLANS TO THE 2012 IFC. THE PROJECT MANUAL DOES NOT LIST THE EDITION OF NFPA 13 OR 72 TO DESIGN THOSE SYSTEMS, SO IT IS VERY IMPORTANT THAT THE PLANS ARE UPDATED TO 2012 IFC SO THE PROPER NFPA STANDARD IS USED FOR DESIGN. |
| 04/11/2013 | RONALD BROWN | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | SHEET A0.0 1. Code Data: a. Correct 2003 ICC ANSI A117.1 to 2009 ICC A117.1. b. Correct 2006 IFC to 2012 IFC 2. Building Area Analysis: a. The proposed 45,219 s.f. is more than the allowable 44,555 s.f. as calculated. Need a fire rated separation between the existing building and the new addition. b. Provide a 1 hour rated closure at the new 19'-8" opening to the Freeweight Area. SHEET A3.0 3. Reference comment 2b. 4. Unisex toilets are not addressed in the 1012 IBC. As per section 2902.2, separate facilities are required for an occupancy load of 16 or more. Section 2902.2.1 allows for these two separate facilities to be family or assisted-use toilet facilities with no gender destiction. a. Two toilet rooms need to be provided for Freeweight Area addition access. SHEET A3.3 5. Please provide structural calculations for all roof top mounted HVAC equipment. SHEET A3.1 6. The square footage shown for the new addition is not the same as the building statistics lisetd on sheet A0.0. The difference is 427 s.f. a. Because of this difference the occupancy load differs. b. Please reconcile. END OF REVIEW |
| 04/12/2013 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: LA Fitness Expanson T13CM01918 Building Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 12, 2013 1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning can not approve the building plan until a development package has been approved. 3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved development package. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 |
| 04/18/2013 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/19/2013 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. The 2012 International Mechanical Code and the 2012 International Energy Conservation Code are the relevant codes for this project. Revise the notes on sheets M0.1 and M3.1 that refer to the 2006 code editions. 2. Demonstrate energy code compliance for the addition to the building envelope using calculations based on the current code. Reference: Sections C101.4.3, C101.5, and C103.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2012. 3. Revise the energy code analysis for the building envelope, coordinating the building components used in the analysis with those shown on the drawing (e.g. a solid concrete wall is not the same as a wall constructed with CMU). Reference: Section C303.1, IECC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson. 4. The HVAC equipment (i.e. the specified packaged heat pumps) shall meet the minimum efficiency requirements. Reference: Section C403.2.3, IMC 2012. 5. Revise the mechanical energy code compliance certificate for the addition. The submitted mechanical energy code compliance certificate states, "COMPLIANCE FAILS: PROPOSED EFFICIENCY FAILS TO MEET CODE REQUIREMENTS." Reference: Section C303.1, International Energy Conservation Code 2012. 6. Show that each rooftop unit has a thermostatic control that provides for off-hour and set-back control, automatic shutdown and start-up control and, if the control does not require manual changeover from the heating and cooling modes, restricts set point overlap. Reference: Section C403.2.4, IECC 2012. 7. Provide heating and cooling load calculations that justify the capacities of the heating and cooling equipment specified for the project. (Clarify also how the total cooling capacities for the heat pumps are less than the sensible capacities.) Reference: Sections C403.2.1 and C403.2.2, IECC 2012. 8. Provide calculations demonstrating adequate ventilation using the current code. Reference: Section 403.2, IMC 2012. 9. Revise the font size used on the drawings to a minimum height of 3/32-inch (e.g. sheet M4.1). Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. |
| 04/19/2013 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. The 2012 International Plumbing Code has been adopted by the City of Tucson and has been in effect since January 1, 2013. The use of the 2012 Uniform Plumbing Code is allowed provided an appeal to the building official is filed. There is no charge for this appeal. 2. Revise the Plumbing Fixture Schedule (P2.1) to indicate that the hot water for the lavatories and public hand-washing sinks will be tempered using an approved device conforming to ASSE 1070. Reference: Sections 416.5 and 607.1.2, IPC 2012. 3. Verify that the pipe sizes serving the flush valves on the water closets (as specified in Section 15410) will not result in water velocities greater than that recommended by the pipe manufacturer (e.g. limit the water velocity to less than 8 FPS for copper, PEX, and CPVC piping). Note that the design flow rate for a flush valve is 25 GPM. Reference: Table 604.3, IPC 2012. 4. Coordinate the piping material specifications shown on sheet P0.1 and Specification Section 15050. Verify that the specified piping materials comply with the requirements of Sections 605 and 702, IPC 2012. |
| 04/19/2013 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/26/2013 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 05/14/2013 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |