Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI
Permit Number - T13CM01851
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/05/2013 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | Building summary on cover sheet references 2006 IFC. Tucson Fire has adopted the 2012 International Fire Code. Check Planning and Development Services website for updated list of adopted codes. Tucson misspelled! Add note to cover sheet indicating deferred submittals required for fire sprinklers, fire alarm changes, installation of exhaust hood fire suppression system. Be advised exhaust hood suppression system needs to be tied into the alarm system. |
| 04/12/2013 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SHEET G0.1; BUILDING SUMMARY: THE CURRENT CODES ENFORCED BY THE CITY OF TUCSON ARE THE 2012 IBC, IEBC, IMC, UPC, IFC, IFGC, AND IECC; THE 2011 NEC; AND THE2009 ICC/ANSI. REVISE AND VERIFY THE REQUIREMENTS OF THESE UPDATED CODES ARE SATISFIED ON THIS PROJECT. 2. SHEET G0.1; BUILDING SUMMARY: THE 'OCCUPANCY GROUP' AND 'ZONING' ARE INTERCHANGED. REVISE. 3. SHEET AD1.1: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE THE ROOM IDENTIFICATIONS ON THE PLAN. 4. SHEET A1.1; FLOOR PLAN KEYNOTES: NOTE 10 WAS NOT LOCATED ON THE PLAN. VERIFY. 5. SHEET A3.2.1; DETAIL 24: PROVIDE THE CONNECTION (SIZE AND QUANTITY) OF THE DIAGONAL BRACE TO THE CONTINUOUS TRACK. 6. SHEET A5.1: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE THE DETAIL NOTES. 7. SHEET I1.1: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. 8. SHEETS R1.1, R1.2, R2.0, R3.1, R3.2, R4.0, AND EM1: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. 9. SHEET R4.0; DETAIL 24: DARKEN THIS DETAIL. 10. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. SUBSEQUENT REVIEWS WILL NOT BE PERFORMED UNTIL RESPONSES ARE PROVIDED. |
| 04/15/2013 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/15/2013 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Revise the drains for the relocated 3-compartment sink and the new 3-compartment sink (detail PSD-7/P5.1) located in the produce prep area are to be independently routed to the indirect waste receptor and terminated with an air gap. Reference: Sections 801.2 and 802.1, IPC 2012. 2. Plumbing schematic C/P6.1 shows a new horizontal vent below the floor being connected to an existing horizontal vent below the floor; this is not allowed under the 2012 IPC. Reference: Section 905.4, IPC 2012. 3. Plumbing schematic B/P6.1 appears to show a horizontal vent for the new grease interceptor; this is not allowed under the 2012 IPC unless the interceptor is located outside. A "horizontal" pipe runs at an angle of less than 45 degrees from the horizontal. Reference: Section 905.4, IPC 2012. |
| 04/15/2013 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Revise the font size used on the drawings to a minimum height of 3/32-inch (see HSD-4/M6.1). Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. 2. Provide structural calculations and details to show that the Type I hood is supported from the building structure in accordance with Section 507.6, IMC 2006. Reference: Section 302.1, IMC 2012. |
| 04/24/2013 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved |