Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Permit Number - T13CM01787
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/29/2013 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: T13CM01787 and T13CM01789 Circle K Store - 530 E. Valencia Road Building Plans for the Store and Fuel Canopy TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 29, 2013 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. It is acknowledged that the Development Package/rezoning case is still under review and that the development package has not been approved as of this building plan review. 2. Based on the initial information on the development package sheets the information for the GFA of the store building and fuel canopy noted on the cover sheet of the building plans do not match. Also the vehicle parking information on the building plan cover sheet is incorrect. It is suggested that coordination with the professional working on the development package drawings is made to ensure that the zoning data is consistent between the building plans and development package plans sheets and Zoning data. 3. Generally as part of the rezoning process conditions of rezoning are made as part of the site development. The rezoning case is still under process and therefore there are no conditions of rezoning that can be reviewed for purposes reviewing any conditions that may apply to the size of building, colors etc. Additional review will be done of the D.P. by the Zoning reviewer to ensure that the D.P. complies with any conditions of rezoning. If any conditions of rezoning affect the design, size, and location, etc of the Store or Fuel Canopy, ensure that the conditions are incorporated into the building plans. 4. Zoning will review the building plans on the next submittal to ensure compliance with approved development package and rezoning conditions. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised building plans and Zoning Data based on the approved D.P. |
| 04/01/2013 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SHEET SD1.4; ELEVATIONS 7 AND 10: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE THE DETAIL REFERENCES. 2. SHEET SD1.4; DETAIL 5: THE CMU NOTE INDICATES TO "SOLID GROUT ALL CELLS WITH #16 VERTICALS @ C @16" OC". REVISE NOTE. 3. SHEET SD1.4; DETAIL 4: THE DISTANCE FROM THE BOTTOM OF THE LARGE PARKING SIGN TO THE TOP OF GRADE/CONCRETE SHOULD BE 7'-0" PER THE CITY OF TUCSON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. REVISE. 4. SHEET A1.2; FLOOR PLAN: AT THE WATER HEATER (KEY NOTE 19), PROVIDE A DETAIL AND/OR NOTE CONCERNING THE SUPPORT MEMBERS AND SHEATHING AT THE SHELF. 5. SHEET A1.3; FLOOR PLAN: THE WALL TYPE E AT THE HALLWAY 111 (INDICATED IN DETAIL 8/A9.1) MUST SHOW TYPE 'X' 5/8" GYPSUM BOARD EACH SIDE OF THE WALL STUD UP TO THE UNDERSIDE OF THE ROOF SHEATHING PER IBC SECTION 708.4, OR MEET ONE OF THE EXCEPTIONS IN THAT SECTION. VERIFY. 6. SHEET A5.1; KEY NOTES: NOTE 22 REFERENCES A SECTION 717.2.2 FROM THE 2006 IBC. REVISE THE REFERENCE FOR THE 2012 IBC. 7. SHEET A5.1; SECTION 2: THE DETAIL REFERENCE 10/A8.2 AT THE ROOF SHOULD BE NOTED AS 'SIMILAR'. VERIFY. 8. SHEET A5.2; SECTIONS 1 AND 2: BOTH SECTIONS CALL OUT A STUCCO SYSTEM (NOTE 10) BEHIND THE CMU VENEER. VERIFY. 9. SHEET A5.2; KEY NOTES: NOTE 26 REFERENCES A SECTION 717.2.2 FROM THE 2006 IBC. REVISE THE REFERENCE FOR THE 2012 IBC. 10. SHEET A5.2; SECTION 1: IS THE DETAIL REFERENCE 8/A8.1 AT THE CMU VENEER CORRECT? VERIFY. 11. SHEET A9.2; SECTION 5: AT THE TOP OF THE STUD WALL, PROVIDE THE BLOCKING SIZE, SPACING, AND CONNECTION TO THE ROOF TRUSSES. 12. SHEET A9.2; DETAIL 9: PROVIDE THE CONNECTION SIZE AND QUANTITY FOR THE METAL TRACK TO THE ROOF STRUCTURE. 13. SHEET A9.2; DETAIL 8: PROVIDE THE CONNECTION SIZE AND QUANTITY FOR THE METAL TRACK TO THE ROOF STRUCTURE. 14. SHEET A9.4; DETAIL 3: PROVIDE THE BRIDGING SIZE, SPACING, AND CONNECTION TO THE ROOF STRUCTURE. 15. SHEET A9.4; DETAIL 3: REVISE THE NOTE AT THE LOFT FLOOR TO '2X4 @ 24" OC', THEN ADD A NOTE FOR THE 2X4 BLOCKING. 16. SHEET S1.1; SPECIAL INSPECTION: IF ALL OF THE SPECIAL INSPECTIONS LISTED ARE REQUIRED ON THIS PROJECT, REVISE THE TEXT SIZE TO A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REMOVE INSPECTIONS NOT REQUIRED. 17. SHEETS S1.2 AND S1.3: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE THE DETAIL NOTES. 18. SHEET S1.2 (DETAIL 8); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 5.9): THE CALCULATIONS SHOW THE CONCRETE BASE AT THE LIGHT POLE TO HAVE 6-#5 VERTICALS, WHILE THE DETAIL INDICATES 5-#6 VERTICALS. CLARIFY. 19. SHEET S1.3: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE THE NOTES. 20. SHEET S2.1; FOUNDATION PLAN: INDICATE GRIDS B, C, D, AND E ON THE PLAN. 21. SHEET S2.1; COLUMN SCHEDULE: INDICATE THE BASE PLATE SIZE ON COLUMN C1 (PER THE CALCULATIONS), OR CALL OUT ON SECTION 2/S5.1. 22. SHEET S2.1 (FOUNDATION PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 4.17): THE CALCULATIONS CALL OUT A 'TYPE 1' SHEAR WALL WITH HDU2 HOLDOWNS AT GRID F, WHILE THE PLAN INDICATES A TYPE 2 SHEAR WALL WITH HDU5 HOLDOWNS. CLARIFY. 23. SHEET S2.1; SHEAR WALL SCHEDULE: NOTE 12 REFERENCES TABLE 2306.4.1, WHICH IS A REFERENCE FROM THE 2006 IBC. REVISE THE REFERENCE TO THE 2012 IBC. 24. SHEET S2.1; FOUNDATION PLAN: AT THE DEPRESSED SLAB, A SECTION CUT 11H/S1.2 IS SHOWN. CLARIFY. 25. SHEET S4.1; DETAIL 7: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE THE SECTION REFERENCE. 26. SHEET S5.1; SECTIONS 1, 2, 3, AND 10: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE SECTION REFERENCES. 27. SHEET S5.1; SECTION 10: PROVIDE STEM WALL INFORMATION, OR REFERENCE ANOTHER SECTION. 28. SHEET S6.1; SECTIONS 1, 2, 4, AND 12: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE THE SECTION REFERENCES. 29. GENERAL: THE P.E. SEAL ON ALL STRUCTURAL SHEETS MUST ALSO INCLULDE AN EXPIRATION DATE FOR THAT LICENSE. PROVIDE. 30. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. NO SUBSEQUENT REVIEWS WILL BE PERFORMED UNTIL RESPONSES ARE RECEIVED. |
| 04/03/2013 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | Unable to approve until Development Plan has been approved by the fire department. We will be looking for proposed and existing fire hydrant location, with dimensions to property lines, in order to determine requirements for fire sprinklers. |
| 04/05/2013 | ERIC NEWCOMB | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Approved | |
| 04/10/2013 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/11/2013 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Revise the font size used on the drawings to a minimum of 3/32-inch and replot the drawings so that the lettering and details are legible (i.e. don't screen the lettering and details). Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. 2. The 2012 International Energy Compliance Code is the relevant energy code for this project (see IECC Load summary on sheet M1.2.2). 3. Provide energy code compliance calculations for the building envelope; use the climate zone for Tucson. Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation and the SHGC for the fenestration. Reference: Sections C103.2 and C401.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2012. 4. Revise the sequence of operation for the restroom exhaust fans so that all of the air supplied to the restrooms will be exhausted with no more than 10% exhausted air being recirculated. Reference: Section 403.2.1 (4), IMC 2012. 5. Coordinate the outside air quantity shown in the heat pump unit schedule for HP-2 with the air balance schedule and the OSA calculation. 6. Show that each rooftop unit has a thermostatic control that provides for off-hour and set-back control, automatic shutdown and start-up control and, if the control does not require manual changeover from the heating and cooling modes, restricts set point overlap. Reference: Sections C403.2.4.1, C403.2.4.2, C403.2.4.3, C403.2.4.3, C403.2.4.3.1, C403.2.4.3.2, and C403.2.4.3.3, IECC 2012. 7. Provide an economizer for the rooftop unit along with means for relieving the excess air during economizer operation or increase the efficiency of the rooftop unit per Table C403.3.1(2), IECC 2012. Reference: sections C403.3.1, IECC 2012. 8. Show how the mechanical system is capable of reducing the ventilation to the minimum required by the OSA calculation on sheet M1.2.2 when higher outside air quantities are not required. Reference: Section C403.2.5, IECC 2012. |
| 04/11/2013 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Revise the font size used on the drawings to a minimum of 3/32-inch and replot the drawings so that the lettering and details are legible (i.e. don't screen the lettering and details). Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. 2. Revise the north arrow on sheet P1.1 to coordinate with the architectural plan north. 3. The rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole (2541.58') is higher than the first floor elevation (2540.1'). Provide a backwater valve per Section 715.1, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson (see also Utility Plan Note 4, civil sheet 5 of 14). 4. Provide structural calculations for the mounting shelf for the water heater to show that the water heater will be safely supported from the building structure. Reference: Section 301.2, IPC 2012. 5. Provide calculations showing how the water supply piping has been sized. Reference: Sections 604.1 and 604.3, IPC 2012. 6. Verify that the pipe sizes called out for the flush valves serving the water closets will not result in water velocities greater than that recommended by the pipe manufacturer (e.g. limit the water velocity to less than 8 FPS for copper piping). Reference: Table 604.3, IPC 2012. 7. Provide backflow protection for the water service to the radiator fill-station. Reference: Section 608.1, IPC 2012. 8. An approved 2-way cleanout fitting is a single fitting, not a field-assembled group of individual fittings as shown in detail 4/P1.3. Reference: Sections 708.3.5 and 708.5, IPC 2012. 9. An approved 2-way cleanout fitting is allowed to be used at the junction of a building drain and a building sewer; otherwise, cleanouts shall open to allow cleaning in the direction of flow. Reference: Sections 708.3.5 and 708.5, IPC 2012. 10. Provide separate indirect waste pipes for each compartment of the 3-compartment sink to protect against cross-contamination or fouling. Reference: Sections 801.2 and 802.1.8, IPC 2012. |
| 04/15/2013 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | T13CM01787 530 E Valencia Circle K Store 1. Submittal Requirements per City of Tucson, all lettering (upper-lower case and numbering) to be minimum 3/32" text. 2. Provide a calculation showing compliance with the City of Tucson Outdoor Lighting Ord # 10963. This ordinance can be obtained on City of Tucson web page , going to Departments- Development Services-Code and Standards. Choose an area under Table 401.1, then choose Option, use allowable lumen output per acre ( of Site), show lumen output used less than allowed. 3. Sheet E1.0, finish numbering circuits to dispensers. 4. Sheet E1.1, text to be min 3/32''. 5. Sheet E1.2, text to be min 3/32'', indicate which fixtures are to be Full Cut Off and which Unshielded, per Tucson Outdoor Lighting Code. 6. Sheet E2.0, explain circuits MVP 1, 2 and 3 . 7. Sheet E6.0, information provided for Power Integrity Service to be minimum 3/32" text. 8. Sheet E6.0, the customer is responsible for providing the service entrance conductors from the 800 amp service to the Utility service point. Indicate size and type of conductors and conduit. 9. Provide an information sheet on the Veeder Root System. 10. The two lighting contactors indicated on Sheet E6.0, are they to be mounted in the Power Integrity Unit or outside next to the enclosure ? Ray T Majuta Elect Plan Review PDSD, City of Tucson 4/17/2013 Ray.Majuta@tucsonaz.gov |
| 04/17/2013 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 04/18/2013 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |