Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESIDENTIAL - BLDG/ZONING/ENGINE/NPPO
Permit Number - T13CM01652
Review Name: RESIDENTIAL - BLDG/ZONING/ENGINE/NPPO
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/27/2013 | MICHAEL ST. PAUL | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL FROM: Michael St.Paul, Planning Technician PROJECT: T13CM01652 3143 West Tumamoc Drive New SFR in R-1 RCP subdivision TRANSMITTAL: March 27, 2013 COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1) This site is located in Coyote Pass, a Residential Cluster Project in the R-1 Zone (LUC Section 2.3.4.2.A.3). The Development Designator is RCP-4 (Section 3.2.3.1.F). Provide the zone of this parcel and the adjacent lots on the plot plan. 2) The permitted use within this subdivision is "detached single family dwellings" (SFR) and subject to LUC Sections 3.6.1 and 3.5.7.1.E & F (Tentative Plat, General Notes #5). 3) Provide a full plot. See the instruction/model included with these comments. The list of requirements is on the back. A copy of these instructions can also be acquired at the zoning-review counter. Just use the twenty-scale survey drawing as your base. 4) An individual lot grading plan is required (Tentative Plat, General Notes #17) and engineering and landscape approvals are required. 5) "Each dwelling unit shall be provided with fire sprinklers" (Tentative Plat, General Notes #12). Fire Department approval is required. 6) Provide a note stating: There shall be no detached accessory structures, such as a ramada, in the front yard or pool area (LUC Section 3.2.5.3.C & UDC Section 6.6.3.B). 7) Place the following subdivision notes on the plot plan: A) "All outdoor lighting will be directed downward and away from surrounding property owners and neighborhoods" (Tentative Plat, General Notes #8). B) "All mechanical equipment, storage and parking areas to be screened with material compatible with the natural environment" (Tentative Plat, General Notes #9). C) "All exposed exterior walls and roofs of structures, retaining walls, and accessory structures, except satellite dishes, shall be earth tone in color and will blend with the predominant natural colors found on the lot or parcel. Satellite dishes may be black. White in not permitted" (Tentative Plat, General Notes #15). 8) There are no further comments at this time. |
| 04/08/2013 | ELIZABETH LEIBOLD | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: April 8, 2013 SUBJECT: 3143 W Tumamoc Dr Site Plan Engineering Review REVIEWER: Elizabeth Leibold ACTIVITY NUMBER: T13CM01652 SUMMARY: The site plan set was received by Engineering for review. Engineering does not recommend approval of the site plan at this time until the following comments are addressed. COMMENTS: 1) Tech Manual 2-01.10.5: Address the following site-grading comments: a) Interceptor swales shall be installed along the top of cut slopes. Revise grading along top cut slope on sheet 4. b) Submit grading plan application with 2 sets of grading plan sheets for review. c) Clarify distance between Northwestern property line and grading limits near proposed wall. (Minimum 2-ft is required.) d) Revise grading limits to reflect realistic disturbance area; be aware that if the Inspector sees additional disturbance beyond grading limits, the project may be subject to stop work orders and /or additional review of revised submitted plans. e) Provide HDZ calculations, including maximum allowable disturbance area. f) Label cut/fill in cubic yards as well as total disturbance area in square feet on grading plan sheet. The next submittal should address all the above items. Prior to resubmittal, you may schedule a meeting with me to go over your comments. If you have any questions, please call me at 837-4934. Elizabeth Leibold, P.E., CPM, CFM Civil Engineer Engineering Division Planning & Development Services Department |
| 04/15/2013 | KEN BROUILLETTE | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | Please provide documentation from the water company that the required fire flow of 2,250 GPM at 20psi residual pressure for a duration of 2 hours is available. |
| 04/16/2013 | KEN VAN KARSEN | BUILDING-RESIDENTIAL | REVIEW | Denied | T13CM01652 PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS Plan review for the above referenced structure has been completed. This letter reflects comments to be addressed. In order to facilitate a shorter back check time, we request that you please provide revised plans and calculations, highlighting any changes, along with a written response to each of the notated items indicating action taken. SCOPE OF REVIEW: The scope of this plan review covers architectural, plumbing, mechanical, energy conservation and electrical. All code references are to the 2012 International Residential Code and the 2012 International Energy Conservation Code. All portions of this project are assumed to meet or will meet other departmental requirements, conditions and concerns before permit approval. GENERAL NOTES: " Limit all code references to those recognized by the City of Tucson. Adopted 2012 codes are listed at the Planning & Development Services web site. Show updated code references on sheet 1.1. " Show compliance with the Inclusive Home Design Ordinance adopted by the City of Tucson on 10/16/2007. Notate accessible route, minimum door width, changes in floor elevation, door hardware, electrical outlet reach range, grab bar reinforcement, etc. " All SFR and Duplex plans submitted after July 1, 2009 require a solar photo-voltaic system, or future installation preparation City of Tucson Ordinance #10549 with the following provisions: 1. A 4 square feet area for (meter, disconnect & inverter) equipment adjacent to the electrical service panel or near the proposed collector panel space. 2. The best roof space available for accommodating PV solar collector panels with capacity for collector dead loading (typically 4 lbs/SF). 3. A minimum 3,800 volt-ampere PV electrical load entry on the Service Load Calculation (Show as a continuous load of 15.8 A). 4. An Electrical Panel Schedule with a 240 volt circuit breaker space labeled "reserved for Photo Voltaic". Show appropriate notation. " All construction drawings submitted after June 1, 2010 for one- or two-family dwellings must provide segregated building drains for future gray water utilization, Ordinance #10579. Include both: a) two clothes washer standpipes, one with an above grade stub-out; b) separate gray water tub/shower and lavatory drain with exterior connection to the building sewer line at 3' from foundation. FOUNDATION PLANS: 1. Show compliance with termite treatment, R320. FLOOR PLANS: 1. Show the door #8 from a garage to dwelling with self-closing and self-latching provision, 2012 IRC Amendment section 309.1. 2. Show the location of a minimum 22" x 30" attic access. Attic access is required for areas exceeding 30 SQ FT with a minimum of 30" of headroom and located in a hallway or readily accessible space, R807.1. SECTIONS - DETAILS: 1. Provide an attic space ventilation calculation and specify size and location of all vents needed to comply, or show compliance with R806.4 by stating "no vapor retarders at the ceiling" for an installation without vented attic space. PLUMBING PLANS: 1. Provide a water hammer arrester for quick-closing valves serving the clothes washer, P2903.5. 2. Show a drain system in compliance with City of Tucson Ordinance #10579 for gray water system preparation. 3. Show plumbing vent (VTR) sizes consistent with Table P3107.3. 4. Notate that gray water systems are in compliance with the City of Tucson Ordinance #10579 and the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality publication #C07-01. 5. Show two clothes washer standpipes. Provide one discharge opening plumbed to the building sewer line and a second discharge opening plumbed to the gray water collection system when discharge to an exterior wall is not feasible, City of Tucson Ordinance #10579. MECHANICAL PLANS: 1. Show supply and return ducts with minimum R-8 insulation (includes vented attics) except when completely located inside the thermal envelope, N1103.2.1. ELECTRICAL PLANS: 1. Notate the requirement for a carbon monoxide detector outside of bedroom doors, R315. 2. Add a double breaker space for future Photo Voltaic on the panel schedule, E3304.11 & E3606.2. 3. Show the location of a typical electrical panel on the Electrical Plan with 4 square feet of clear area for future Photo Voltaic equipment, E3501.6.2 & E3605.8. 4. Revise the electrical load calculation showing a minimum 3,800 volt-ampere or 16 A continuous load entry for future Photo Voltaic equipment, E3502.2. 5. Protect all proposed outlets (except bathrooms and kitchen) including receptacles, lights and smoke detectors with combination type arc-fault circuit interrupters, E3902.12. Clarify note #26. OUTDOOR LIGHTING CODE 1. Show compliance with City of Tucson Outdoor Lighting Code with an approved lighting calculation in accordance with OLC 3.1.2. Include all exterior fixtures on the property in the calculations. Provide spec sheets for all full cut-off fixtures showing the lamp type, placement and fixture wattage. All other fixtures are assumed to be unshielded (non-FCO style). Fixtures are only exempt from the total lumen budget if both of the full cut-off FCO style and located under overhangs, OLC 5.1.2. If you have any questions please contact: Ken Van Karsen (520) 837-4912 City of Tucson Residential Plan Review |
| 04/24/2013 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | STRUCTURAL COMMENTS 1. SHEET S0.1 (CAST IN PLACE CONCRETE); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (PAGE 36): THE DRAWINGS INDICATE CONCRETE DESIGNED FOR 2500 PSI, BUT THE WALL ON PAGE 36 INDICATES 3 KSI. CLARIFY. 2. SHEET S0.1 (PLYWOOD); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (PAGE 58): THE PLANS INDICATE NAILING FOR EXTERIOR WALLS TO BE 8d NAILS AT 6" OC EDGE AND 12"OC FIELD, WHILE THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE 8d NAILS AT 3" OC EDGE AND 12" OC FIELD. COORDINATE. 3. SHEET S0.3; TYPICAL MASONRY WALL REINFORCING DETAIL 20: NOTE 1 INDICATES TO SEE THE MASONRY WALL REINFORCING SCHEDULE FOR REINFORCING. IS THERE A SCHEDULE? VERIFY AND REVISE NOTE AS REQUIRED. 4. SHEET S0.3 (SITE WALLS); SHEETS S3.1 AND S3.2 (VARIOUS SECTIONS): IT APPEARS THE BOTTOM OF THE FOOTING VARIES FROM SITE WALLS TO SOME EXTERIOR AND INTERIOR FOOTINGS. SHOW ON THE PLANS WHERE DETAIL 007 IS REQUIRED. 5. SHEET S1.1; FOUNDATION PLAN NOTES: NOTE 4 WAS NOT LOCATED ON THE PLAN. VERIFY. 6. SHEET S1.1; FOUNDATION PLAN NOTES: NOTE 15 WAS NOT LOCATED ON THE PLAN. VERIFY. 7. SHEET S2.1; ROOF FRAMING PLAN: MOVE THE BEAM DB3 (AS REFERENCED IN THE CALCULATIONS) ON THE ROOF FRAMING PLAN SO THAT IT IS LEGIBLE. 8. SHEET S2.1; ROOF FRAMING PLAN: MOVE THE BEAM DB7 (AS REFERENCED IN THE CALCULATIONS) ON THE ROOF FRAMING PLAN SO THAT IT IS LEGIBLE. 9. SHEET S2.1; ROOF FRAMING PLAN NOTES: NOTE 23 WAS NOT LOCATED ON THE PLAN. VERIFY. 10. SHEET S3.1; DETAIL 305: A BOXED NOTE REFERENCES DETAIL 301. REVISE THE NOTE REFERENCE. 11. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. SUBSEQUENT REVIEWS WILL NOT BE PERFORMED UNTIL RESPONSES ARE RECEIVED. |