Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - BLDG/FIRE/ZONING/ENG
Permit Number - T13CM01437
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - BLDG/FIRE/ZONING/ENG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/21/2013 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: T13CM01437 Debris Barricade & Fence Crossing at Drainage Channels Construction Plans TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 21, 2013 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Zoning has reviewed the plans but cannot approve them at this time. The Development package is still under review and has not been approved. 2. Zoning has reviewed the plans for compliance with the Development Package. The plans submitted for the construction of the crossing do not match what is designed on the development package drawings. It is suggested that the consultants confer with each other and ensure that the final design that is to be used is drawn on both sets of drawings, and should match. 3. Zoning will review the plans on the next submittal to ensure that the development package completed and approved and also to ensure that the crossing plans match the crossing plans on the approved DP. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised plan |
| 04/09/2013 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SHEET S1 (FOUNDATION PLANS); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (PAGE 19): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE A FOOTING AT THE CENTER POST (F1) TO BE 11.5' X 5.25' X 24". THE PLANS INDICATE F1 IS 11'-6" X 4'-9" X 2'-0". CLARIFY. 2. SHEET S1 (NORTH FOUNDATION PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (PAGE 22): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE FOOTINGS AT THE END POSTS (F2 OR F3) OF 11.5' X 3.0' X 20". THE PLAN INDICATES F2 IS 10'-6" X 4'-0" X 2'-0", AND F3 IS 8'-0" X 3'-0" X 1'-3". CLARIFY. 3. SHEET S1 (ELEVATION 2); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (PAGE 5): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE TO DESIGN THE FENCE AND RACK COMPONENTS FOR A MAXIMUM 15'-6" COLUMN SPACING, WHILE THE ELEVATION INDICATES A LARGER SPACING AT THE FENCE ENDS. CLARIFY. 4. SHEET S2 (SECTION 1); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (PAGE 9): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE A MAXIMUM 9" SPACING OF THE TRASH RACK BRACE BARS. WHERE IS THIS SPACING CALLED OUT ON LTHE DRAWINGS? 5. SHEET S2 (SECTION 1); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (PAGE 25): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE THE TRASH RACK PLATE ANCHORAGE REQUIRES 4-5/8" DIAMETER ANCHORS WITH 6" EMBEDMENT. IS THIS FOR THE POST BRACE? CLARIFY. ADD CALCULATIONS FOR THE TRASH RACK BASE PLATE AND ANCHORS. 6. SHEET S2; SECTION 1: AT THE CONCRETE CUT OFF WALL, INDICATE THE VERTICAL BARS (#4 @ 12") OCCUR AT EACH FACE. 7. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS: PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR THE GRADING SUPPORT CONNECTION TO THE CONCRETE CHANNEL (SECTIONS 2A AND 2B ON SHEET S2). 8. GENERAL: PROVIDE A COPY OF THE GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORT FOR REVIEW. 9. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. NO SUBSEQUENT REVIEWS WILL BE PERFORMED UNTIL THOSE RESPONSES ARE RECEIVED. |
| 04/10/2013 | LAITH ALSHAMI | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 04/29/2013 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |