Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI
Permit Number - T13CM00896
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/28/2013 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SHEET CVR; CODE INFORMATION: ADD THE ICC/ANSI A117.1-2009 EDITION TO THIS LIST. 2. SHEET ED-1; KEYNOTES: THERE ARE TWO SEPARATE NOTES DESIGNATED AS 5. REVISE. 3. SHEET A-0; FLOOR PLAN: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE THE DETAIL REFERENCES AND DOOR INDICATORS. 4. SHEET A-0; KEYNOTE 5: PROVIDE A DETAIL ON THE DRAWINGS FOR THE WALL MOUNTED HANDRAIL AND REFERENCE THE SPECIFIC CODE SECTION ON THE PLAN (ICC/ANSI SECTION 505). 5. SHEET A-3; KEYNOTE 4: THE NOTE REFERENCES SHEET A-3. REVISE (THIS IS SHEET A-3). 6. SHEET A-3; KEYNOTES 1, 2, AND 3: THESE NOTES WERE NOT LOCATED ON THE PLANS. VERIFY. 7. SHEET A-8; RESTROOM NOTES: A NOTE REFERENCES THE 2012 EDITION OF THE ICC/ANSI. REVISE TO THE 2009. 8. SHEET A-9; ROOF PLAN: AT ONE LOCATION ON THE ROOF, A NEW HVAC UNIT IS TO REPLACE AN EXISTING UNIT. VERIFY THE NEW UNIT WEIGHT IS NO MORE THAN THE EXISTING WEIGHT. IF THE NEW UNIT WEIGHT IS MORE THAN THE EXISTING, PROVIDE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS CONFIRMING THE EXISTING ROOF STRUCTURE CAN ADEQUATELY SUPPORT THE NEW UNIT. 9. SHEET S2.0; FRAMING PLAN: THERE ARE FOUR CLOUDED LINTELS ON THE FRAMING PLAN. THE ARCHITECTURAL PLAN INDICATES NO NEW LINTEL IS REQUIRED AT THESE LOCATIONS, BUT THE STRUCTURAL DETAIL 202 (CUT AT ONE OF THE CLOUDED LINTELS) IS FOR NEW LINTELS. REMOVE THE SECTION CUT ON THE PLAN AT THIS LOCATION. 10. SHEET S2.0 (FRAMING PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (PAGE 2): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE LINTEL LT3 IS A 6X14 WOOD BEAM, WHILE THE PLAN INDICATES A 3 1/2" X 12" GLB. COORDINATE. 11. SHEET S2.0 (FRAMING PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (PAGE 30): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE BEAM B2 TO BE MC8X8.5 AT 3'-0" OC, WHILE THE PLAN (NOTE 5) INDICATES MC8X8.5 AT 5'-0" MAX. COORDINATE. 12. SHEET S3.0; DETAIL 202: THIS DETAIL INDICATES THE NEW DOUBLE STUDS AND LINTEL BEAM ARE NAILED TO THE EXISTING WALL STUDS FROM THE EXISTING WALL SIDE. EXPLAIN HOW THIS WILL BE DONE (ADD NOTE TO DETAIL). 13. SHEET S3.0; DETAIL 203: THE CHANNEL REFERENCED IN NOTE 4 IS AN 8" CHANNEL. DO THE BOLT LOCATION DIMENSIONS VERIFY THAT DEPTH? WILL THE CONNECTION PLATE DIMENSION (6") BE VALID FOR THE 8" CHANNEL? VERIFY. 14. SHEET S3.0; DETAIL 204: THIS DETAIL INDICATES THE RADIUS CHANNEL (NOTE 3) AND THE STEEL CHANNEL (NOTE 2) ARE THE SAME DEPTH. REVISE THE DETAIL. 15. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 03/06/2013 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/18/2013 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/18/2013 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide gas pipe sizing calculations demonstrating conformance to Section 402.1 and 402.3, IFGC 2012 (e.g. 400 CFH @ 250 feet can accommodate only 366 CFH per Table 402.4(2), 2006 IFGC). 2. Provide tempered water for the lavatories using approved devices conforming to ASSE 1070. Reference: Section 416.5, IPC 2012. 3. Correct the detail tiles on sheet P3. 4. Verify that the relief port for the specified backflow preventer for P-6 is directed to either an approved indirect waste receptor or to the outside, where water leakage will not cause damage. Reference: Section 608.14, IPC 2012. |
| 03/18/2013 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved |