Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T13CM00547
Parcel: 11504520A

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW

Permit Number - T13CM00547
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
01/30/2013 RONALD BROWN ADA REVIEW Passed
02/05/2013 LOREN MAKUS ENGINEERING REVIEW Approved
02/05/2013 ERIC NEWCOMB BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied STRUCTURAL COMMENTS BY ERIC NEWCOMB
1. SHEET G-0.01: IT APPEARS THE STRUCTURAL PORTION OF THE INDEX WAS CUT OFF AT THE BOTTOM. VERIFY.
2. SHEET G-0.02: A NOTE BELOW THE SYMBOLS LEGEND INDICATES SPECIAL INSPECTIONS SHALL BE PROVIDED ACCORDING TO THE 2009 IBC. REVISE.
3. SHEET G-0.02; GENERAL BUILDING REQUIREMENTS: A NOTE AT THE TOP OF THE TABLE REFERENCES THE 2006 IBC. REVISE. VERIFY AND REVISE ALL SECTION REFERENCES IN THE TABLE.
4. SHEET G-0.02; PROJECT NOTES: NOTE 1 REFERENCES SEVERAL CODES. REVISE EDITIONS AS REQUIRED.
5. SHEET G-0.03: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE THE VERBIAGE IN THE DETAILS.
6. SHEET G-1.01; ACCESSIBILITY NOTES: SEVERAL REFERENCES ARE MADE TO THE 2003 EDITION OF THE ICC/ANSI A117.1. REVISE.
7. SHEET G-1.02: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE THE LEED SCORECARD AND THE OUTLINE SPECIFICATION GUIDE.
8. SHEET S-1.01; GENERAL STRUCTURAL NOTES (BUILDING CODE): THE BUILDING CODE LISTED IS THE 2006 IBC. REVISE THE NOTE, AND VERIFY LOADS USED IN THE DESIGN OF THIS PROJECT.
9. SHEET S-2.01 (FOUNDATION PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (PAGE F5): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE THE FOOTING AT GRIDS G AND 2.8 TO BE A CF1 (1728 KIP CAPACITY), WHILE THE PLAN INDICATES A CF6 (500 KIP CAPACITY). CLARIFY.
10. SHEET S-2.01 (FOUNDATION PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (PAGE F5): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE THE FOOTING AT GRIDS B AND 8 TO BE A CF1 (1782 KIP CAPACITY), WHILE THE PLAN INDICATES A CF2 (1563 KIP CAPACITY). CLARIFY.
11. SHEET S-2.01 (FOUNDATION PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (PAGE F5): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE THE FOOTING AT GRIDS C AND 8 TO BE A CF2 (1563 KIP CAPACITY), WHILE THE PLAN INDICATES A CF5 (1114 KIP CAPACITY). CLARIFY.
12. SHEET S-2.01 (FOUNDATION PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (PAGE F5): THE PLAN INDICATES FOOTINGS AT GRIDS A AND 8, AND GRIDS A AND 9, BUT THE CALCULATIONS SHOW NO FOOTING AT THOSE LOCATIONS. VERIFY.
13. SHEET S-2.01; FOUNDATION PLAN: NO SUMP PIT IS INDICATED AT THE ELEVATOR PIT BETWEEN GRIDS F AND F.8, AND NORTH OF GRID 2. VERIFY.
14. SHEET S-2.01; FOUNDATION PLAN: AN ELEVATION INDICATOR LOCATED BETWEEN GRIDS G AND G.8 AND SOUTH OF GRID 2 REFERENCES 1/S-3.01. REVISE THE SHEET REFERENCE.
15. SHEET S-2.01; FOUNDATION PLAN: ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE PLAN, PROVIDE A DIMENSION BETWEEN GRIDS E.7 AND F.
16. SHEET S-2.01; FOUNDATION PLAN: A NOTE AT THE RAMP INDICATES A 12" CONCRETE RAMP WALL. ADD 'TYPICAL' TO THAT NOTE.
17. SHEET S-2.01a (GRADE BEAMS GB1 AND GB2); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (PAGES MG43 AND MG45): CALL OUT THE GRADE BEAM WIDTH (5'-0") ON THE DRAWINGS. DETAIL 118 SHOWS THE GRADE BEAM THE SAME WIDTH AS THE CAISSON, BUT THE WIDTH WAS NOT INDICATED SPECIFICALLY.
18. SHEET S-2.01a (GRADE BEAM GB1); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (PAGE MG43): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE GB1 HAS TWO ROWS OF 10-#10 IN THE BOTTOM, WHILE THE DETAIL CALLS OUT 2 ROWS OF 8-#10. CLARIFY.
19. SHEETS S-2.02, S-2.03, S-2.04, S-2.05, S-2.06, S-2.07, S-2.08, S-2.09, S-2.10, S-2.11, S-2.12, S-2.13, AND S-2.14; POST TENSION DESIGN: ADD THE SHEET REFERENCE TO THE NOTE AT THE BOTTOM OF THE POST-TENSION DESIGN BOX.
20. SHEET S-2.03; ENLARGED ELEVATOR FRAMING PLAN: IS DETAIL 301 CUT IN THE RIGHT LOCATION? VERIFY.
21. SHEET S-2.15; 14TH FLOOR HIGH SLAB PLAN: DETAIL 246 IS CUT ON GRID 9 WEST OF GRID C.2. IS THIS CORRECT? VERIFY.
22. SHEET S-3.03; TRANSFER BEAM TB1: AT THE TOP REINFORCING, INDICATE (2) 5-#9 (SIMILAR TO THE BOTTOM REINFORCING).
23. SHEET S-3.03 (TRANSFER BEAM TB2); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (PAGE M5): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE TB2 HAS (2) 8-#10 BOTTOM REINFORCING, WHILE THE DETAIL INDICATES (2) 6-#10. CLARIFY.
24. SHEET S-3.03 (TRANSFER BEAM TB3); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (PAGE M7): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE 6-#10 TOP REINFORCING EXTENDS 10.0 FEET FROM THE SUPPORT. VERIFY THE TOP 6-#10 BETWEEN GRIDS B AND B.4 EXTEND 10' INTO THE SPAN (SHOWN LESS THAN 10').
25. SHEET S-3.03; TRANSFER BEAM TB4: ON THE BOTTOM REINFORCING, INDICATE (2) 8-#10.
26. SHEET S-3.03; TRANSFER BEAM TB5: ON THE BOTTOM REINFORCING, INDICATE (2) 8-#10.
27. SHEET S-3.03; SECTION B: INDICATE THE DISTANCE BETWEEN THE TOP BAR LAYERS AND THE DISTANCE BETWEEN THE BOTTOM BAR LAYERS (PER SECTION A).
28. SHEET S-3.05: REVISE THE DRAWING TITLE.
29. SHEET S-4.01; DETAIL 116: REVISE THE NUMBER OF THE NOTE THAT REFERENCES THE CAISSON (SHOWN AS 18).
30. SHEET S-4.01; DETAIL 103: THE DETAIL INDICATES A NOTE 6, BUT THERE IS NO NOTE 6. VERIFY.
31. SHEET S-4.01; DETAIL 104: NOTE 9 INDICATES THE TOP PORTION OF THE CAISSON TO BE 4000 PSI CONCRETE, BUT THE GENERAL STRUCTURAL NOTES ON SHEET S-1.01 INDICATE CAISSONS TO BE 4000 PSI CONCRETE FOR THE ENTIRE LENGTH. VERIFY.
32. SHEET S-4.01; DETAIL 106: THE DETAIL INDICATES A NOTE 5, BUT THERE IS NO NOTE 5. VERIFY.
33. SHEET S-4.01; DETAIL 109: NOTE 8 APPEARS ON THE DETAIL AT TWO LOCATIONS. VERIFY.
34. SHEET S-4.01; DETAIL 114: NOTES 1 AND 2 POINT TO THE SAME SLAB. VERIFY.
35. SHEET S-4.01; DETAIL 115: NOTE 11 INDICATES THESE BARS ARE CONTINUOUS. VERIFY.
36. SHEET S-4.01; DETAIL 116: THE DETAIL INDICATES A NOTE 18. VERIFY.
37. SHEET S-5.01; DETAIL 201: IN NOTE 4, INDICATE THE SPECIFIC DETAIL.
38. SHEET S-5.01; DETAIL 211: IN NOTE 3, PROVIDE THE ANCHOR INFORMATION.
39. SHEET S-5.01; DETAIL 222: NOTE 3 INDICATES A BOLT SCHEDULE. WHERE IS THAT LOCATED? ADD A REFERENCE TO THE NOTE.
40. SHEET S-5.02; DETAIL 227: ADD NOTE 5 ON THE DETAIL.
41. SHEET S-5.03; DETAIL 236: INDICATE NOTE 5 ON THE DETAIL (TO REPLACE ONE OF THE NOTE 3).
42. SHEET S-5.03; DETAIL 242: NOTE 1 ON THE DETAIL POINTS TO THE WRONG ELEMENT. VERIFY.
43. SHEET S-5.03; DETAIL 242: PROVIDE THE SPACING OF THE EMBED PLATES IN NOTE 1.
44. SHEET S-5.03; DETAIL 248: ADD NOTE 2 ON THE DETAIL.
45. SHEET S-5.03; DETAIL 248: ADD NOTE 5 ON THE DETAIL.
46. SHEET S-5.03; DETAIL 248: ADD NOTE 6 ON THE DETAIL.
47. SHEET S-5.03; DETAIL 248: ADD NOTE 10 ON THE DETAIL.
48. SHEET S-6.01: PROVIDE OR REFERENCE A TYPICAL BOLT SCHEDULE (AS NOTED ON SEVERAL DETAILS).
49. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS: ALL VOLUMES INDICATE THE 2006 IBC WAS USED. REVISE THE NOTE AND VERIFY ALL CALCULATIONS MEET THE 2012 IBC.
50. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS; VOLUME 1: IN THE CALCULATIONS, PROVIDE A KEY PLAN (OR USE THE KEY PLANS ON PAGES C1, C2, C3, AND C4) THAT INDICATE THE CC NUMBER REFERENCE. THE PLANS EXAMINER COULD NOT RELATE THE C NUMBERS ON THE CALCULATION KEY PLANS TO THE CC NUMBERS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS. THANK YOU.
51. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS; PAGE L41: THE STATIC LOAD CASES LIST THE 2006 IBC FOR THE SEISMIC FORCES. VERIFY THESE MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE 2012 IBC.
52. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS; LATERAL ANALYSIS: PROVIDE A SUMMARY SHEET IN THE CALCULATIONS FOR THE SHEAR WALLS, INDICATING WALL THICKNESS AND REINFORCING.
53. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS; MAT AND GRADE BEAM DESIGN: PROVIDE A SUMMARY SHEET IN THE CALCULATIONS FOR THE SHEAR WALL FOUNDATIONS, INCLUDING FOOTING SIZE, REINFORCING, AND LOCATION.
54. GENERAL: THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT WAS NOT FOUND IN THIS SUBMITTAL PACKAGE. PROVIDE FOR REVIEW.
55. GENERAL: ALL DEFERRED SUBMITTALS MUST BE APPROVED IN WRITING BY RON BOOSE (BUILDING OFFICIAL) BEFORE THOSE SUBMITTALS WILL BE REVIEWED. RON.BOOSE@TUCSONAZ.GOV.
56. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS.

T13CM00547/THE HUB AT TUCSON
2012 IBC CODE REVIEW/2009 ICC A117.1
BY RON BROWN ARCHITECT

GENERAL
57. The City of Tucson minimum size (actual height not font size) of lettering is 3/32” for both upper and lower case. Several sheets in this submittal have lettering that does not meet this minimum standard. Please revise all lettering for all sheets (including structural, mechanical, plumbing and electrical) to the required minimum and resubmit.
SHEET G0.02
58. Redo your code analysis for using the 2012 IBC because of changes from the 2006 to the 2012.
a. The code section reference of section 1014.5 Dead End Corridors does not exist in the 2012 IBC. The 2006 IBC, Section 1014.5 refers to egress balconies. As per both the 2006 and 2012, allowed dead end corridors are 50’ sprinklered not 20’ as listed.
b. Listed Section 3.03 refers to table 1019.2. Table 1016.1 is the correct 2006 IBC reference for travel distance to exits as is Table 1016.2 for the 2012 IBC.
Sheet G0.03
59. Antunevich Associates Accessibility Plans and Heights are not an acceptable accessibility code reference. Please delete this sheet in its entirety and reference all accessibility requirements to that as per the 2012 IBC, Chapter 11 and the ICC A117.1, 2009 Edition.
SHEET G1.01
60. At Accessible Notes, note 1, the City of Tucson governing accessible code is Chapter 11 of the 2012 IBC and the 2009 Edition of ICC A117.1 not the 2003 edition as listed.
61. At the Building Data listing, please change the 2006 IBC to the 2012 IBC.
a. Please review all other listed codes and insure the accuracy as per our web site, City of Tucson, Planning and Development Services Department.
62. Please provide a building total number of occupants
SHEET G1.04
63. Being that the mercantile spaces are yet to be defined, please insure that all exiting requirements are as per the 2012 IBC and no exiting through the future storage rooms.
SHEET A101
64. At detail 3, the bottom of the larger is to be 7’-0” a.f.f.
65. At detail 2:
a. The maximum slope for all accessible parking areas is 2% in all directions, ref ICC A117.1, Section 502.5.
b. Why pole mounted signs when the accessible parking spaces front to an exterior wall?
SHEET A2.01
66. Ditto comment 63
67. The parking summary on sheet G1.0 indicates 5 accessible parking spaces are to be provided. There are only 4 accessible spaces shown on the floor plan. Please reconcile and resubmit.
68. The parking summary shown on G1.0 is 100. Sheets A2.01 and A2.02, when combined, show only 97 total parking spaces. Where are the remaining three?
69. Verify proper accessible door clearance and jamb clearances required by ICC A117.1, Section 404.2.3.2 for doors 120A, 121A, STR2-1A, 128A and STR3-1A.
70. As per the door schedule on sheet A10.05, door 120A is not indicated as a labeled door in a 2 hour partition.
a. The door schedule does not show a hardware set/type for each door.
b. Coordinate door schedule to have proper fire ratings assigned to the doors located in a fire rated partition.
71. Toilets 111 and 112 are not accessible, redesign and resubmit.
SHEET A2.02
72. Ditto comment 69, door STR1-2
SHEET A2.03
73. Fix door 301-A
SHEET A2.04
74. Please provide code analysis for use of three exit stairs to the third level
and 2 exit stairs from level four to the penthouse level.
SHEETS A2.06 AND A2.08
75. Please reference all Type “A” units from 1/8” scale floor plans to the ¼” scale partial floor plans.
SHEET A4.01
76. At detail 1:
a. Toilets 111 and 112 are not accessible. Provide water closet clearance as required by ICC A117.1, Section 604.3.
b. Doors 109-A and 110-A do not comply with ICC A117.1, Section 404.2.3.2.
77. Please provide door numbers for all ¼” Partial Floor Plans.
78. Detail 2, door STR2-12B does not comply with ICC A117.1, Section 404.2.3.2.
SHEET A4.03
79. At Detail 1:
a. Two accessible means of entry to the pool and spa are required.
b. Please review ICC A117.1, 2009 Edition, Section 1109 and provide entrances as required.
c. Door STR1-PHA is not compliant with ICC A117.1, Section 404.2.3.2.
SHEET A4.04
80. Verify lavatory/sink height for accessibility and provide proper dimension.
SHEET A4.05
81. At detail 2, Unit 605”A”: the shower is not drawn as a compliant roll in , transfer type stall as required per ICC A117.1, Section 1003.11.2.5.2.
a. Not roll in, has a curb
b. No grab bars shown
c. No seat shown
SHEET A4.18
82. Ditto comment 81 per detail 4.
SHEET A4.233
83. At detail 2, show the grad bars and seat in the accessible, roll in shower.
SHEET A4.24
84. Unit 401 is indicated as a type ”A” unit. This would provide a total of five type “A” units when only 4 were calculated and listed on sheet G1.01. This unit is not listed on the Unit Matrix and not shown on sheet A2.04 nor A4.24. Please reconcile.
85. Detail 3, ditto comment 25.
SHEET A5.01
86. Details 2 and 5: Provide accessible counters as required by ICC A117.1, Section 904.
SHEET A5.02
87. Detail 17, provide water closet clearances as required by ICC A117.1, Section 604.3
SHEET A5.06
88. Detail 1, provide accessible lavatory/sink as per ICC A117.1, Section 606.3.
SHEET 5.11
89. For all accessible showers show on this sheet in both plan and elevation, redraw showers to show:
a. Seat
b. Roll in showers with no curb.
SHEET 5.12
90. Ditto comment 89
SHEET A7.03 AND A7.04
91. Finish the details
SHEET a7.05
92. Provide dimensions for all risers and treads
93. Provide landing elevation differences
94. Reference stair sections
95. Reference handrail elevations
END OF REVIEW
02/07/2013 KEN BROUILLETTE FIRE REVIEW Denied Fire Code Review:
This review was conducted using the 2012 International Fire Code.
Please provide a written response for each item. It is acceptable to add a note to the drawings or indicate where in the plans compliance is indicated.

1. Fire Command Center 129 is not correct size see 2012 IFC Section 508.1.3.
2. Sheet A10.05 Door Schedule-What column in schedule refers to hardware set description? Indicate hourly rated of all fire rated doors and glass.
3. Sheet M-7.01 3 of 5 page and number 4 NFPA ? List editions and Standard numbers.
4. Sheet G-1.04 Generator is required to be in 2 hour room-IFC 604.2.14.1
5. Sheet G-0.02 General Notes. Incorrect codes add IFC 2012.
6. Sheet G-1.04 Indicate proper exiting for "M" Occupancy. Look at the number of required exits for Retail 1 and 2.
7. Sheet E-3.01 Missing Exit signage. It should match G-1.04 for egress paths.
8. Is generator going to be sized for all egress lights for 90 minutes duration or is the egress emergency lighting all going to have 90 minute batteries? Remember Generator needs to service several other life safety items including elevator.
9. Sheet G.1.04- Please indicate the locations of the FSD/FD in all rated walls.
10. Sheet G-1.04 Please indicate the Discernible path of egress per IFC 1014.2 for the exit path from corridor through S-2 occupancy.
11. The fire pump room door 264-A is only 3 feet wide. The door should be wide enough to accommodate the largest piece of equipment. Please see IFC 901.4.6.
12. Egress doors 120A and 121A please indicate what type of hardware is going to be used.
13. Please review IFC Section 317.1 Landscape Roofs for compliance.
14. Please review IFC Section 308.1.4 Open-flame cooking devices. The trellis is made of combustible construction and a 10 foot separation is required from the cooking area.
15. IFC Section 404 requires a Fire Safety and Evacuation Plan for Group R-2 College and University Buildings. Please indicate compliance will be provided.
16. Submit the layout for the fire command center as required in IFC 508.1.4
17. Indicate how compliance will be met for Emergency Responder Radio Coverage per Section 510.1.
18. Indicate compliance with Section 604.2.14 for Standby Power for High-Rise Buildings.
19. Indicate compliance with Automatic Smoke Detection per IFC 907.2.9.3 and 907.2.13.1.
20. Indicate if a wired communication system will be used in lieu of compliance of Section 510 as allowed in Section 907.2.13.2.
21. Indicate compliance with Section 914.3.1.2 for water supply to required fire pump.
22. Indicate that the building will be supplied with an Automatic Wet Standpipe System per IFC Section 905.1 and have a connection on the landscaped roof areas per 905.3.8.
23. Please indicate on which plan shows the location of Portable Fire Extinguishers as required in Section 906.
02/08/2013 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Denied PDSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: The HUB
T13CM00547
Building Plan (1st Review)

TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 8, 2013


1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed.

2. Zoning has reviewed the building plans they appear to match the development package.

3. Due to the amount of comments from other PDSD review agencies Zoning will not stamp and approve the building plans at this time.

4. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved development plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956
02/08/2013 BETH GRANT COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING Needs Review
02/11/2013 CPIERCE1 WWM REVIEW Needs Review
02/11/2013 RAY MAJUTA ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied T13CM00547
1011 N Tyndall
The HUB

The Electrical Review has been denied, address each item individually and indicate how each was addressed.

1. Change all references to 2005 NEC to 2011 NEC.
2. Sheet E1.00 provides a lumen calculation however does not comply with the 2012 City of Tucson Outdoor Lighting Code. Review Chapter 4 and Table 401.1,choose an option and calculate compliance on allowed lumen output.
3.Several unit floor plans showing electrical layout do not have illumination as required for the panels,110.26.(D) such as sheets-E401.J,E4.02B,E4.02J,E4.03B,E4.03JE4.07B,E4.10H,E4.11,E4.11G,E4.16. Please check all others.
4. Following sheets missing smoke detectors in bedrooms or halls,E4.05, E4.06, E4.12E.
5. Sheet E5.00, indicate on plan the 3000 amp 277/480 volt section with a 2500 amp main is to be tested per 230.95.C and written record made available to AHJ.
Since information regarding the Fire Pump is included on this sheet , following information must be provided on this permit:
6. Sheet E5.00, show how Fire Pump circuit is to be installed per 695.6 , on the supply side and per 695.6.A.1 and per 2 on the feeder side.
7. Indicate FP Controller as service equipment approved, and listed for fault current value f-9, on sheet E5.04.
8. Provide overcurrent information on FP Disconnecting Means per 695.4.
9. Notate on Sheet E5.00, Fire Pump Installation to comply with 2011 NEC,695 and 2010 NFPA 20.
10. Provide a detail of Fire Pump Room on Sheet 2.02 showing clearances concerning equipment in this room.
11.Sheet 2.02 Electrical Room , notate this sheet, doors to comply with 110.26.C.3 for personnel doors.
12.Sheet E2.01, indicate Electrical Room to have ARC Flash Warning per 110.16.
13.Sheet E5.00, SES- H, has a 200 amp feed to the 100 amp ATS which in turn feeds panel 2EL, should it be a 100 amp
OCD at SES-H ?
14. Sheet E5.00, Panel 3p has a 400 amp CB feeding panel 6P with only a 150 amp feeder ?
15.Sheet e6.00, mark value of AIC rating in Panel 2H.
16. Sheet E6.00, cannot locate following circuits on power plan, Panel 13P-29,31,33,35,37,39,24,26,28,30. Also Panel 2H- 20,22,24,26,28,30,32,34,36,38,40,42.
17.Sheet E5.02, the 3000 amp Residential service is a 3 phase system, the individual units are single phase, show how the individual units are to be supplied by which individual phases if A,B, or C. Provide calculation showing a balance between phases to within 15% of each other.
18. 2011 NEC 700.27 requires Emergency system overcurrent devices to be selectively coordinated with all supply side overcurrent devices , show how you will comply with this.

Ray T Majuta
Electrical Plan Review
PDSD,City of Tucson
2/14/2013
Ray.Majuta@tucsonaz.gov
02/26/2013 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Provide fixture descriptions for all of the plumbing fixtures; coordinate the marks used for the residential and the public fixtures. Reference: Section 402, IPC 2006.
2. If the showers do not have pre-fabricated receptors, provide details to show that the construction of the receptors comply with the requirements of Section 417.5.2, IPC 2006.
3. Provide shower and tub/shower control valves that comply with the requirements of Section 424.5, IPC 2006.
4. Coordinate the plumbing plans with the architectural backgrounds (e.g. on sheet P2.05 many of the fixtures have no associated piping and in room 501, piping for the kitchen is shown located in a bedroom and the bathroom piping is shown in the Jacuzzi - other sheets have similar issues). Reference: Section 106.3.1, IPC 2006.
5. Show how the temperature of the hot water supply to the public lavatories is controlled. Reference: Section 416.5, IPC 2006 and Section C404.3, IECC 2012.
6. Verify that the water velocity for the water supply to the booster pumps does not exceed the pipe manufacturer's recommendations. Reference: Table 604.4, footnote (c), IPC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson
7. Provide pressure-absorbing devices for the water connections to appliances equipped with quick-acting or solenoid valves (e.g. clothes washers). Reference: Section 604.9, IPC 2006.
8. Show how the temperature of the hot water supply to the private lavatories is controlled. Reference: Section C404.3, IECC 2012.
9. Provide the specifications and the rated working pressure for the water supply piping to be used between the booster pumps and the pressure reducing valves. Reference: Section 605.3, IPC 2006.
10. Provide a low-pressure cutoff for the booster pump per Section 606.5.5, IPC 2006.
11. Clarify the piping diagram for the boilers: how does the cold water enter the boilers and how does the hot water recirculation system comply with Section 607.2.3, IPC 2006 or the manufacturer's instructions?
12. Show how the water pressure for the hot water system is controlled to less than 80 PSI. Reference: Section 604.8, IPC 2006.
13. Clarify the roof drainage and plans shown on sheet P-2.14. Reference: Sections 1101, 1106 and 1107, IPC 2006.
14. Complete the design for the deck drains on floors 5, 6, 8, 9, and 10. Reference: Section 106.3.1, IPC 2006.
15. In the trash rooms 113 and 114, an equipment (or appliance) mark, "CW-1" is shown; what is it?
02/26/2013 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Approved
02/28/2013 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Provide energy code compliance calculations for the building envelope; use the climate zone for Pima County < 4,000 feet. Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation and the SHGC for the fenestration. Reference: Sections 101.4 and 104.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2006.
2. Provide auxiliary drain pans or secondary drain systems for fan coil units located above ceilings. Reference: Section 307.2.3 IMC 2006.
3. Revise the size of the condensate drains per Section 307.2.2, IMC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson.
4. Show the size, routing, and termination of the condensate drains for the corridor fan coils (e.g. FC-801, FC-802). Reference: Section 307.2, IMC 2006 as amended by the City of Tucson
5. Label the size and termination of the condensate drains for fan coils FC-101 and FC-102. Reference: Section 307.2, IMC 2006 as amended by the City of Tucson.
6. Label the sizes of the condensate drains for fan coils FC-CS1, FC-103, FC-E1, FC-R01, and FC-R03. Reference: Section 307.2, IMC 2006 as amended by the City of Tucson.
7. Revise the ventilation calculations to include the air distribution effectiveness and the system ventilation efficiency for the multiple-zone systems. Reference: Section 403.2, IMC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson.
8. Provide minimum ventilation rates for the parking garage per Section 404.2, IMC 2006.
9. Revise the length of the dryer exhaust ducts to comply with Section 504.6.1, IMC 2006.
10. Revise the enlarged mechanical plan for residential unit 7 so that EF-1 is not connecting to the dryer exhaust duct. Reference: Section 504.1, IMC 2006.
11. Revise the enlarged mechanical plan for unit 13 so that the dryer duct originates at the washer/dryer and not in the shower. Reference: Section 106.3.1, IMC 2006.
12. Clarify the return air configuration for FC-101; the fan-coil unit appears to be located in a return air plenum. If so, remove the pressurized exhaust duct from the plenum. Reference: Section 601.4, IMC 2006.
13. Clarify the construction of the enclosures for the fan coils serving the corridors on floors 2 - 12, e.g. FC-802. In the fire separation diagrams for floors 2 - 7, the enclosure is shown as having a 2-hour separation from the corridor and the adjacent residential units and also having a 1-hour separation between the fan coil unit and the shaft for the outside air duct that runs up to the roof of the building. For floors 8 - 12, only the 1-hour separation is shown. None of the architectural plans show the existence of a fire-rated shaft or even a wall between the fan coils and the outside air duct; the mechanical plans do show a fire damper located between the fan coil and the outside air duct. If the fan coil enclosure is to be separated from the corridor with a fire-rated partition, how are the openings for the supply and return grilles for the unit to be protected? Provide a riser diagram for the outside air duct. Reference: Section 106.3.1, IMC 2006.
14. Clarify the intent of the exhaust for the residential trash rooms; the mechanical plans show a fire damper at each floor but there is no wall in which the damper can be mounted. Provide a riser diagram for the trash room exhaust system. Reference: Section 106.3.1, IMC 2006.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
03/20/2013 CPIERCE1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed