Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI
Permit Number - T13CM00496
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/28/2013 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 01/28/2013 | LAITH ALSHAMI | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 01/28/2013 | ERIC NEWCOMB | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Passed | |
| 01/28/2013 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SHEET CS; CODE INFORMATION (APPLICABLE CODES): REVISE THE CODES LISTED TO: 2012 IBC, IMC, IFC, ENERGY CONSERVATION, IPC, AND UPC. 2011 NEC. 2009 ICC/ANSI. VERIFY THAT THE REQUIREMENTS OF THESE CODES HAVE BEEN MET. 2. SHEET A1.1; KEY NOTES: NOTE 10 WAS NOT LOCATED ON THE PLAN. VERIFY. 3. SHEET A1.2; DETAILS 1 AND 2: THE DETAILS REFERENCE 3/A6 FOR THE METAL TIN CEILING. IS THAT CORRECT? VERIFY. 4. SHEET A2; SHELF ELEVATIONS: PROVIDE DETAILS ON THE DRAWINGS (NOT ON 8 1/2 X 11) FOR THE CONNECTION OF THE SHELVES TO THE FLOOR. 5. SHEET A5; KEY NOTES: NOTE 5 REFERENCES DETAIL 3/A6. IS THAT CORRECT? VERIFY. 6. SHEET A5; KEY NOTES: NOTE 2 REFERENCES DETAIL 2/A6.2. REVISE (NO SHEET A6.2). 7. SHEET A13; ELEVATION 2: PROVIDE A DIMENSION TO THE PAPER DISPENSER PER ICC/ANSI A117.1, FIGURE 604.9.2. 8. SHEET S1: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE THE GENERAL NOTES. 9. SHEETS S2, S2.1, S2.2, S3, S4, AND S6: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE THE SHEET NOTES, AND DETAIL/SECTION VERBIAGE. 10. SHEET S6: ARE THE NEW MECHANICAL UNIT WEIGHTS SIMILAR TO THE PREVIOUS WEIGHTS? VERIFY. 11. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 01/28/2013 | ERIC NEWCOMB | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 01/29/2013 | KEN BROUILLETTE | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | PLANS NEED TO BE DESIGNED TO THE 2012 INTERNATIONAL CODES |
| 01/30/2013 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Terminate condensate drains in accordance with Section 307.2.1, IMC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson. 2. Provide calculations demonstrating adequate ventilation. Reference: Section 403.2, IMC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson. 3. Revise the font size used on the drawings (e.g. M3) to a minimum of 3/32-inch. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. |
| 01/30/2013 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Provide tempered water for the lavatories using approved devices conforming to ASSE 1070. Reference: Section 416.5, IPC 2012. |
| 01/30/2013 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 01/30/2013 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/08/2013 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Approved |