Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI
Permit Number - T13CM00406
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/23/2013 | MICHAEL ST. PAUL | ZONING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 01/23/2013 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Provide details to show how the fan coil and the filter fan modules are to be connected to the building structure. |
| 01/23/2013 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | T13CM00406 1. The electrical values shown on sheet E-2 do not coinside with what is shown on sheet M2.1 for HP-A or FC-A. There is also a 3.6 kw aux heat supply ? Ray T Majuta Elect Plan Review PDSD, C of Tuc 1/23/2013 Ray.Majuta@tucsonaz.gov |
| 01/23/2013 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 01/23/2013 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SHEET A2.0 (ENLARGED FRAMING PLAN); SECTION 4: ON THE PLAN, NOTE 11 INDICATES 16" WOOD I-JOISTS AT 24" CENTERS, WHILE THE SECTION INDICATES 6" METAL STUDS AT 16" CENTERS. CLARIFY. 2. SHEET A2.0; ENLARGED FRAMING PLAN: PROVIDE A SECTION CUT 4/A2.0 ON THE PLAN. 3. SHEET A2.0; ENLARGED FLOOR PLAN: IN ROOMS 102 AND 103, THERE ARE KEY NOTE SYMBOLS THAT ARE INCOMPLETE. VERIFY. 4. SHEET A2.0; KEY NOTES: KEY NOTES 4, 14, 19, AND 20 WERE NOT LOCATED ON THE PLANS. VERIFY. 5. SHEET A2.0; ENLARGED FLOOR PLAN: AN ENLARGED DETAIL REFERENCE IN THE SOUTH HALLWAY INDICATES 1/A2.0. IS THIS CORRECT? 6. SHEET A2.0; KEY NOTES: A REFERENCE TO KEY NOTE 22 IS ON EACH PLAN, BUT NO KEY NOTE 22 IS LISTED. VERIFY. 7. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 01/23/2013 | LAITH ALSHAMI | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 01/23/2013 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Provide justification for the use of the sump pump for fixtures that could be gravity-drained. Reference: Section 712.1, IPC 2012. |
| 01/23/2013 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | Please provide quantities of bottled gases, and indicate how they meet the limits established by the hazardous materials limits in the 2012 International Fire Code. Indicate signage will be provided. Indicate the use of the fume hood(s) and wether or not fire sprinklers will be required. |
| 01/23/2013 | ERIC NEWCOMB | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Passed | |
| 01/23/2013 | ERIC NEWCOMB | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 01/30/2013 | FRODRIG2 | WWM | REVIEW | Approved |