Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - TI ALL
Permit Number - T13CM00264
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - TI ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/06/2013 | KEN BROUILLETTE | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | previous comments were not addressed. Spoke to Kyle Reckinger and he will coordinate with Arct. |
| 03/11/2013 | RONALD BROWN | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | RESUBMITTAL REVIEW PRESENTED IN ALL CAPS SHEET A0.0 1. The list of Design Codes is outdated. As of 2 January 2013, the City of Tucson adopted the 2012 International Code Series. Please correct the code list to that as per our web site. NON-RESPONSIVE, PLEASE RECONICLE 2. The building code analysis and data is incomplete. Please provide all code analysis on the drawings and building information data. NON-RESPONSIVE, PLEASE RECONICLE SHEET A2.1 2. Several detail references to Sheet A2.1 are incorrect. Please reconcile. NON-RESPONSIVE, PLEASE RECONICLE STRUCTURAL SUBMITTAL 3. Provide structural calculations for building design. OK 4. Provide structural calculations for all roof top mounted HVAC equipment. OK 5. Provide certification of all required special inspectors. The certification form is located on our web site. OK ADDITIONAL COMMENTS SHEET A0.1 6. Please change all "ADA" references to the 2012 IBC, Chapter 11 and ICC A117.1, 2009 Edition. SHEET2.1 7. Ditto comment 6. a. Insure all accessible requirements stated in the accessibility specification are as per the 2006 IBC, Chapter 11 and ICC A117.1, 2009 Edition and not the ADA nor the 2010 ADASAD. END OF REVIEW |
| 03/14/2013 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/19/2013 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 03/22/2013 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/25/2013 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/25/2013 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Comment not resolved; provide the energy code compliance certificate for the building envelope using the current code and the correct location (i.e. not Pima County >= 4,000 ft) [Original comment: Demonstrate energy code compliance for the building envelope and for the mechanical systems using calculations based on the current code, IMC 2012. Reference: Sections 101.5 and 101.5.1, International Energy Conservation Code 2012.] 2. Comment not resolved; detail 4/P2.0 still calls for the condensate to "spill to roof". Note that Lennox rooftop units typically have a 1" condensate outlet, not the ¾" called out on sheet P1.0. [Original comment: Condensate drains shall be terminated at an approved disposal location. Reference: Section 307.2.1, IMC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson.] |
| 03/27/2013 | BETH GRANT | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Needs Review |