Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: REVISION - - 1ST
Permit Number - T13CM00153
Review Name: REVISION - - 1ST
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/13/2013 | KEN VAN KARSEN | BUILDING-RESIDENTIAL | REVIEW | Denied | T13CM00153 PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS Plan review for the above referenced structure has been completed. This letter reflects comments to be addressed. In order to facilitate a shorter back check time, we request that you please provide revised plans and calculations, highlighting any changes, along with a written response to each of the noted items indicating action taken. SCOPE OF REVIEW: The scope of this plan review covers architectural, plumbing, mechanical, energy conservation and electrical. All code references are to the 2012 International Residential Code, 2011 National Electrical Code and Arizona Revised Statutes. All features were checked only to the extent allowed by the submittals provided. All portions of this project are assumed to meet or will meet other departmental requirements, conditions and concerns before permit approval. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS: All corrections and revisions shall be made on original tracings or a finished reproducible set. Return two sets along with a set of the first submission for reference. Pen or pencil corrections on final prints will not be acceptable. To avoid delays, ensure that all corrections have been made, are complete, and have been coordinated on all applicable detail and note sheets. (Do not cloud the changes made for comment revisions). Incorporate changes on originals and provide two copied sets for review. All engineers and architects involved in the design of the structure are to seal the related sheets of plans, details and calculations in accordance with the rules of the State Board of Technical Registration. GENERAL NOTES: " Limit all code references to those recognized by the City of Tucson. The 2011 NEC is listed at the Planning & Development Services web site. General notes sheet PV1. " Provide drawings with legible notation (minimum 3/32" lettering). Increase the new module notation (sheet PV6) same size as lettering below. " Provide a single line diagram identifying the DC string identifier and other details not appearing on the three line diagram. " Provide manufacturer specification sheets for the mounting hardware if changed from previously approved hardware. DIAGRAMS / CALCULATIONS 1. Show the sum of the main and backfed breakers not exceeding 120% of the busbar rating, NEC 690.64 (B) (2). Main breaker replacement may not negatively affect the equipment integrity or listing, NEC 110.3. Provide an electrical load calculation if reducing the main breaker rating. NOTES / SPECIFICATIONS 1. Provide the exact wording and location for the DC Power Source "Imp, Vmp, Vmax, Isc" marking required by NEC 690.53. If you have any questions please contact: Ken Van Karsen (520) 837-4912 City of Tucson Residential Plan Review |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 02/21/2013 | CPIERCE1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |