Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: PIA - SUBMITTAL
Plan Number - T12PI00001
Review Name: PIA - SUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/24/2012 | JOSE ORTIZ | DOT TRAFFIC | REVIEW | Denied | January 24, 2012 ACTIVITY NUMBER: T12PI00001 PROJECT NAME: Circle K PROJECT ADDRESS: Miracle Mile-Flowing Wells PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Traffic Engineer Resubmittal Required: Traffic Engineering does not recommend approval of the PIA Plan; therefore a revised PIA Plan is required for re-submittal. The following items must be revised or added to the plan. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. 1. Address the redlines on sheets 1 and 6 in the submitted drawings. During the next submittal please re-submit the roll of redlines for back checking purposes. 2. Place the PIA and CDRC Case number on the cover sheet. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-6730 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
| 02/03/2012 | GARY WITTWER | DOT LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Passed | No comment |
| 02/07/2012 | RLEIGH1 | UTILITY CLEARANCES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER CO | Denied | |
| 02/07/2012 | RICHARD LEIGH | DOT ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | February 6, 2012 SUBJECT: Circle K Offsite Improvements SEC Miracle Mile & Flowing Wells Rd. I-2012-001 T12PI00001, 1st Rev. PROJECT REVIEWER: Richard Leigh, DOT, Permits and Codes Section Permits and Codes Section has reviewed the PIA plan set for the subject project and does not recommend approval of the PIA Plan at this time. The following comments need to be addressed in the next submittal. Please provide a written response to each comment and include red line drawings with re-submittal. 1. Include the plan number "I-2012-001" in title block of each sheet. 2. Include Development Services Department PIA activity number "T12PI0001" on cover sheet. 3. Provide cross section callouts in plan views for cross sections shown on sheet 3. 4. Clearly delineate and label the ADOT right-of-way limits in plan views. 5. Include in the drawing legend all line work used in drawing. 6. Pedestrian access easements will be required for the curb access ramps located on private property. Delineate easements in plan views and label with recordation information. 7. Sheet 1: Revise street name on the project over view map, the names shown are incorrect. 8. Sheet 3: Show and label cross slopes and longitudinal slopes for the proposed bus bay. 9. Sheet 3, Pavement structural Detail: Clarify that the minimum dry density for the subgrade under the proposed PCCP is 100% per SSPI Sec. 205. 10. Sheet 5: Provide construction details of the proposed channel adjoining the sidewalk scupper at Sta. 42+29.42, 26.49 LT (Flowing Wells Rd). 11. Sheet 5: Provide construction details for the PCCP right turn lane. Construction of the right turn lane/ Bus Bay should be based on either COT Bus Bay Detail or ADOT C-05.50. 12. Provide ADOT's written approval for the proposed improvements within ADOT right-of-way. 13. The minimum width for any new sidewalk is 5' per D.S. 3-01-4.1.A. Revise the proposed sidewalk width along Flowing Wells Rd to reflect this. 14. Please submit copies of the PIA paving plans to the following utilities and provide this office with a Utility Plan Receipt from each of the utility companies: City of Tucson Transportation Department, Streets Division Tucson Water Pima County, Wastewater Management Qwest Communications Tucson Electric Power Cox Communications Southwest Gas Corp. El Paso Natural Gas* Kinder Morgan Energy* * When the above two utilities are not involved, a form filled out with the "RECEIVED BY:" line stating "not needed" may be submitted. Refer to redline plans for additional comments and comment details. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-6647 or Richard.Leigh@tucsonaz.gov |
| 02/07/2012 | RICHARD LEIGH | PIA COORDINATOR | CUSTOMER CALLED; PLANS @ AMBASSSADOR | Completed | STREET & TRAFFIC MAINTENANC COMMENTS Here our my comments: 1. Sheet 1 - Street Names are incorrect (This has already been circled in red) 2. Sheet 3 - With 4" of mix 2 will that be placed in 2 lifts? 3. Sheet 4 - Please provide gutter grades 4. Sheet 4 - Handicap ramps appear to be on private property. These will be maintained by the property owner? That's all I have. Thanks Richard Lance |
| 02/07/2012 | LANCE PETERSON | DOT STREET MAINTENANCE | REVIEW | Denied | |
| 02/07/2012 | RICHARD LEIGH | PIA COORDINATOR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed | STREET & TRAFFIC MAINTENANC COMMENTS Here our my comments: 1. Sheet 1 - Street Names are incorrect (This has already been circled in red) 2. Sheet 3 - With 4" of mix 2 will that be placed in 2 lifts? 3. Sheet 4 - Please provide gutter grades 4. Sheet 4 - Handicap ramps appear to be on private property. These will be maintained by the property owner? That's all I have. Thanks Richard Lance |
| 02/08/2012 | RLEIGH1 | UTILITY CLEARANCES | COX COMMUNICATION | Completed | |
| 02/08/2012 | RLEIGH1 | UTILITY CLEARANCES | SOUTHWEST GAS CORP | Completed | |
| 02/08/2012 | RLEIGH1 | UTILITY CLEARANCES | EL PASO NATURAL GAS | Completed | |
| 02/08/2012 | RLEIGH1 | UTILITY CLEARANCES | KINDER MORGAN ENERGY | Completed | |
| 02/08/2012 | RLEIGH1 | UTILITY CLEARANCES | COT STREETS DIVISION | Completed | |
| 02/08/2012 | RLEIGH1 | UTILITY CLEARANCES | COT WATER NEW DEVELOPMENT | Completed | |
| 02/08/2012 | RLEIGH1 | UTILITY CLEARANCES | PC WASTEWATER MGMT | Completed | |
| 02/08/2012 | RLEIGH1 | UTILITY CLEARANCES | QUEST COMMUNICATION | Completed |