Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T12CM08133
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/25/2013 | KEN BROUILLETTE | FIRE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | FIRE ALARM SYSTEM REQUIRED PER IFC 907.2.6 AND 907.2.6.1 |
| 05/02/2013 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | The proposed natural gas distribution system is complex and spread over three drawings; provide a gas isometric as requested. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. (Note: you show a 12" gas riser near the elevator on sheet P1.2.) [Original comment: Provide a gas isometric, to include total developed length, and BTU consumption, also include method used for sizing.] |
| 05/02/2013 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. PREVIOUS COMMENT 7: THE ELEVATION REFERENCE 4/a8.1 AT THE TRASH ENCLOSURE ON SHEET x1.2 WAS NOT REVISED. 2. PREVIOUS COMMENT 9: IF THE INTERIOR NON-BEARING WALL METAL SUDS (AS DESIGNED IN THE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS SHEET 117) ARE NOT INDICATED ON THE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS, WHERE ARE THEY DESIGNATED ON THE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS? PROVIDE A REFERENCE ON EITHER THE ARCHITECTURAL SHEETS OR THE STRUCTURAL SHEETS. 3. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 05/13/2013 | ELIZABETH EBERBACH | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | TM Sec.2-01.2.1.A: Building sets should have correct grading information for site improvements based on Cyprus Civil approved sheets that have not been picked up yet / issued. Floodplain Use Permit applications for both buildings may be issued once the grading (DP12-0226) is approved and the building sets have the correct sheets pertaining to grading. Parking lot elevations are critical to the floodplain use permit requirements. Grades shown on development package sheet DP1.1 are not the final approved grades, and the stamp on sheet 1.3 is not the approved set stamp for grading. The approved set with the stamp marked with the approval stamp with April signatures (sheets 1, 2, & 3) must be provided in the set. Prior to issuance of permits, building plan sets should have correct civil sheets, and grading and Floodplain Use permits should be issued prior to, or concurrently with building permit issuance. Call to discuss. Elizabeth Leibold P.E. 837-4934 |
| 05/13/2013 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 05/13/2013 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Revise the envelope energy compliance calculations using components (i.e. roof, walls, door, and windows) and component areas that match those shown on the drawings. [Original comment: Provide energy code compliance calculations for the building envelope; use the climate zone for Pima County < 4,000 feet. Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation and the SHGC for the fenestration. Reference: Sections 101.4 and 104.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2006.] 2. The revised balancing data shows 2,000 CFM of supply air leaving AC-1 with 1,200 CFM of return air and 900 CFM of fresh air entering AC-1; where does the extra 100 CFM go? [Original comment: Clarify the air balance for AC-1/HX-A. How can the AC-1 deliver 1200 CFM of outside air when its only source of outside air is HX-A which takes in only 800 CFM of outside air? The total intake of the exhaust air devices connected to AC-1 appears to be 3475 CFM. If 1200 CFM is exhausted through HX-A, 800 CFM from HX-A is added to the remaining return air stream, and only 2000 CFM is supplied to the building, where does the remaining 1075 CFM go? Also, how will the 1500 CFM that has been exhausted from the restroom and the 1000 CFM that has been exhausted from the shower room be limited to only 10% of the 2000 CFM supply airstream? Reference: Section 403.3 and footnote h, Table 403.3, IMC 2006.] 3. The revised balancing data shows 2,000 CFM of supply air leaving AC-9 with 800 CFM of return air and 1100 CFM of fresh air entering AC-9; where will the extra 100 CFM needed for supply air come from? [Original comment: Clarify the air balance requirements for AC-2/HX-B and AC-9/HX-D with regard to the outside air quantities. Reference: Sections 106.3.1 and 403.3, IMC 2006.] 4. The termination of the 4" dryer vent from room 206 is no longer shown on the roof drawing, M3.1. [Original comment: A 4" dryer vent is shown near column J4 (Room 206) on sheet m1.2 and the termination of a 4" dryer vent is shown near column I6 on sheet m3.1. Are these dryer vents independent or is there just one 4" dryer vent?] 5. No structural details showing how the hoods are to be connected to the roof framing were found, only a key note indicating that more information could be found on the mechanical drawings. [Original comment: Provide structural calculations and details to show that the Type I and Type II hoods are supported from the building structure in accordance with Section 507.6, IMC 2006. Reference: Section 302.1, IMC 2006.] |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 05/21/2013 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 05/21/2013 | CPIERCE1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |