Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T12CM08133
Parcel: 117023490

Address:
1002 N MAIN AV

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW

Permit Number - T12CM08133
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
01/07/2013 ERIC NEWCOMB BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. SHEET g1.0; INDEX OF DRAWINGS (GENERAL): SHEET G1.2 IS LISTED TWICE. REVISE.
2. SHEET g1.0; INDEX OF DRAWINGS (ARCHITECTURAL): SHEETS a1.2, a1.3, a6.1, a6.2, AND a9.2 ARE NOT LISTED IN THE INDEX. REVISE.
3. SHEET g1.1 (TYPICAL HEIGHTS); SHEET g1.2 (ELEVATION 2): ELEVATION 2 LOCATES THE PAPER DISPENSER FROM THE BACK WALL, WHILE THE TYPICAL HEIGHTS SHOWN ON g1.1 LOCATE IT FROM THE FRONT OF THE WATER CLOSET. COORDINATE PER THE ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003, FIGURE 604.7.
4. SHEET g1.3; SECOND FLOOR PLAN: IT APPEARS TWO DOORS OUT OF ROOM 212 MAY NOT MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE IBC SECTION 1021.2 (EXCEPTION) BY REDUCING THE REQUIRED EXIT WIDTH BY MORE THAN ONE-HALF. VERIFY.
5. SHEET x1.0; KEYNOTES: KEYNOTE 1.3 WAS NOT LOCATED ON THE PLAN. VERIFY.
6. SHEET x1.1; DETAIL 14: CALL OUT THE BLOCK WALL REINFORCING, OR REFERENCE A DETAIL.
7. SHEET x1.2; TRASH ENCLOSURE PLAN: DO YOU WANT ELEVATION REFERENCE 4/a8.1 (AS SHOWN), OR 7/x1.2? VERIFY.
8. SHEET s1.0; STRUCTURAL STEEL: DIFFERENTIATE BETWEEN THE BOLTS IN NOTES 2 AND 3.
9. SHEET s1.0 (LIGHT GAGE STEEL); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 117): ARE THE INTERIOR NON-BEARING WALL METAL STUDS (AS INDICATED IN THE CALCULATIONS) INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS? VERIFY.
10. SHEET s1.4 (LIGHT GAGE LINTEL SCHEDULE); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 121): DO YOU WANT TO INDICATE OPENING WIDTHS ON THE SCHEDULE PER THE CALCULATIONS (AND SIMILAR TO THE MASONRY LINTEL SCHEDULE)? VERIFY.
11. SHEET s1.4: ARE THE SHEAR WALLS INDICATED ON SHEET s1.4 IN THE CALCULATIONS? VERIFY.
12. SHEET s2.0; FOUNDATION PLAN: ARE THE COLUMNS AND FOOTINGS BETWEEN GRIDS G AND G.1 AND BETWEEN GRIDS 11 AND 12 (C2/F4) IN THE CALCULATIONS? VERIFY.
13. SHEET s2.0; FOUNDATION PLAN: ARE THE FOOTINGS AND COLUMNS ON GRID 5 AND BETWEEN GRIDS B AND G IN THE CALCULATIONS? VERIFY.
14. SHEET s2.0 (FOUNDATION PLAN); SHEET s3.0 (DETAILS 102, 103, 109, AND 118): THESE DETAILS OCCUR ON THE PLAN BETWEEN GRIDS G AND H AND BETWEEN GRIDS 2 AND 2a. DETAILS 102, 103, AND 118 INDICATE EXTERIOR WALLS, WHILE DETAIL 109 INDICATES INTERIOR WALL. CLARIFY.
15. SHEET s2.1 (LOW ROOF FRAMING PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 20): TWO BEAMS ON GRID 5 (W21X73) WERE NOT LOCATED IN THE CALCULATIONS. VERIFY.
16. SHEET s2.1 (LOW ROOF FRAMING PLAN); SHEET s2.2 (HIGH ROOF FRAMING PLAN): ON GRID 4, EAST OF GRID C, DETAIL 320 IS CUT ON THE LOW ROOF PLAN, WHERE A HIGH ROOF BEAM (W18X40) AND A LOW FLOOR BEAM (W16X31) ARE INDICATED. DETAIL 329 IS CUT AT THE SAME LOCATION ON THE HIGH ROOF PLAN, AND THAT DETAIL INDICATED A GLU-LAM BEAM BELOW. CLARIFY.
17. SHEET s2.1 (LOW ROOF FRAMING PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 89): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE A 'WORST CASE LINTEL' ON GRID H AND DESIGN MASONRY LINTELS ON SHEET 90, BUT THE LOW ROOF FRAMING PLAN INDICATES ONLY A LT1 IN THIS LOCATION (METAL STUD HEADER). CLARIFY.
18. SHEET s2.1 (LOW ROOF FRAMING PLAN); SHEET s4.0 (DETAIL 212): ON THE PLAN, THIS DETAIL IS CUT BETWEEN GRIDS 9 AND 10 NEAR GRID G.1. NO STEEL BEAM IS INDICATED ON THE PLAN (OR IN THE CALCULATIONS), BUT IS SHOWN ON THE DETAIL. CLARIFY.
19. SHEET s2.1; LOW ROOF FRAMING PLAN: DETAIL CUT 320 ON GRID 4 BETWEEN GRIDS B AND C IS NOT CORRECT (DETAIL INDICATES WOOD JOIST AND DECK). VERIFY.
20. SHEET s2.1; LOW ROOF FRAMING PLAN: DETAIL CUT 339 ON GRID 5 BETWEEN GRIDS A AND B IS NOT CORRECT (BEAM IS STEEL TUBE). VERIFY.
21. SHEET s2.2 (HIGH ROOF FRAMING PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 21): IS BEAM B28 IN THE CALCULATIONS (W12X14) SHOWN ON THE PLAN? VERIFY.
22. SHEET s2.2 (HIGH ROOF FRAMING PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS: IS THE BEAM BETWEEN GRIDS B AND D AND NORTH OF GRID 3 IN THE CALCULATIONS? VERIFY.
23. SHEET s2.2 (HIGH ROOF FRAMING PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS: IS THE BEAM BETWEEN GRIDS H AND J AND ON GRID 4 IN THE CALCULATIONS? VERIFY.
24. SHEET s3.0; DETAIL 113: PROVIDE A DIMENSION FOR THE DEPTH OF THE TURNDOWN AT THE REFRIGERATION SLAB.
25. SHEET s4.0; DETAIL 202: NOTES 4 AND 5 ARE REVERSED. VERIFY.
26. SHEET s4.0; DETAIL 207: ADD THE SPACING OF THE STEEL PLATES (NOTE 6).
27. SHEET s5.1; DETAIL 320: NOTE 1 POINTING TO THE ROOF DECK IS NOT CORRECT. VERIFY.
28. GENERAL (STRUCTURAL): VERIFY ALL BEAMS SHOWN ON THE FRAMING PLANS ARE IN THE CALCULATIONS.
29. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS; SHEETS 83 THROUGH 88: WHERE ARE THESE FOOTINGS LOCATED? PROVIDE ON A KEY PLAN.
30. GENERAL (STRUCTURAL): VERIFY ALL COLUMNS AND FOOTINGS SHOWN ON THE FOUNDATION PLAN ARE IN THE CALCULATIONS.
31. GENERAL (STRUCTURAL): PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR THE LIGHT POLE FOUNDATION (DETAIL 34/s1.3).
32. GENERAL (STRUCTURAL): PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR THE SITE WALL (DETAIL 20/s1.3).
33. GENERAL (STRUCTURAL): ALL DEFERRED SUBMITTALS MUST BE APPROVED IN WRITING BY RON BOOSE (BUILDING OFFICIAL) BEFORE THOSE SUBMITTALS WILL BE REVIEWED. RON.BOOSE@TUCSONAZ.GOV.
34. SHEET a2.0; REFLECTED CEILING PLAN LEGEND: MOVE THE TITLE SO ALL KEYNOTES ARE LEGIBLE.
35. SHEET a2.1; REFLECTED CEILING PLAN: ADJUST THE NORTH/SOUTH BUILDING SECTION CUTS AT THE TOP OF THE SHEET SO THEY ARE LEGIBLE.
36. SHEET a3.0; ROOF PLAN: THE ROOF DRAINS LOCATED ON GRID I BETWEEN GRIDS 1 AND 2 AND BETWEEN GRIDS B AND C AND GRIDS 2 AND 2a ARE DASHED. EXPLAIN.
37. SHEET a4.0; WEST ELEVATION: ADD GRID LINES TO THE ELEVATION.
38. SHEET a4.1: ADD GRID LINES TO ALL ELEVATIONS.
39. SHEET a5.0; KEYNOTES: KEYNOTE 5.8 WAS NOT LOCATED ON THE SECTIONS. VERIFY.
40. SHEET a5.1 (SECTION E); KEYNOTES: KEYNOTE 7.19 INDICATES A FLOOR ASSEMBLY, WHILE THE KEYNOTE (BETWEEN GRIDS I AND J) POINTS TO THE ROOF. VERIFY.
41. SHEET a5.1 (SECTION E); KEYNOTES: KEYNOTE 7.20 INDICATES A ROOF ASSEMBLY, WHILE THE KEYNOTE (BETWEEN GRIDS I AND J) POINTS TO THE FLOOR. VERIFY.
42. SHEET a5.1; SECTION F: COMPLETE THE DETAIL REFERENCE ON GRID C.
43. SHEET a5.2 (SECTION H); KEYNOTES: KEYNOTE 7.1 INDICATES A ROOFING SYSTEM, WHILE THE KEYNOTE (BETWEEN GRIDS 2 AND 3) POINTS TO THE FLOOR. VERIFY.
44. SHEET a5.2 (SECTION H); KEYNOTES: KEYNOTE 9.1 INDICATES A STUCCO SYSTEM, WHILE THE KEYNOTE (BETWEEN GRIDS 2 AND 3) POINTS TO THE CEILING. VERIFY.
45. SHEET a6.1 (WALL SECTION g); KEYNOTES: KEYNOTE 5.20 INDICATES METAL FASCIA, WHILE THE KEYNOTE POINTS TO A STEEL BEAM. VERIFY.
46. SHEET a7.0; ELEVATION 18: REVISE THE COUNTERTOP HEIGHT ON THE RIGHT SIDE OF THE ELEVATION TO MATCH ELEVATION 19.
47. SHEET a7.1; ELEVATION 20: DOES THE HEIGHT OF THE SINK NEED TO BE ACCESSIBLE? VERIFY.
48. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS.
01/07/2013 BETH GRANT COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING Approved
01/16/2013 RICK MYERS PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Installation of a boiler requires a State permit, and inspection. 2. Provide detail #4 on sheet P4.3- Kitchen gas appliances. 3. Provide a gas isometric, to include total developed length, and BTU consumption, also include method used for sizing. 4. Include the method of sterilization for the potable water system. See: 609.9 2006 UPC. 5. Provide a site utility plan.
01/22/2013 RAY MAJUTA ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Approved approved
01/22/2013 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Approved
01/22/2013 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Provide energy code compliance calculations for the building envelope; use the climate zone for Pima County < 4,000 feet. Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation and the SHGC for the fenestration. Reference: Sections 101.4 and 104.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2006.
2. Provide a design for the proposed Type I and Type II hood installations that clearly shows that the installations will comply with the requirements of Sections 302, 506, 507, and 508, IMC 2006. (Shop drawings are not a substitute for sealed drawings.) Reference: Section 106.3.1, IMC 2006.
3. Clarify how the cassette fan coils (FC-A, FC-B, FC-C, and FC-D) are to be connected to the floor/ceiling structure - detail 5/m5.1 assumes connection to a wood structure. Reference: Section 106.3.1, IMC 2006.
4. Provide calculations demonstrating adequate ventilation. Reference: Section 403.3, IMC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson.
5. Clarify the air balance for AC-1/HX-A. How can the AC-1 deliver 1200 CFM of outside air when its only source of outside air is HX-A which takes in only 800 CFM of outside air? The total intake of the exhaust air devices connected to AC-1 appears to be 3475 CFM. If 1200 CFM is exhausted through HX-A, 800 CFM from HX-A is added to the remaining return air stream, and only 2000 CFM is supplied to the building, where does the remaining 1075 CFM go? Also, how will the 1500 CFM that has been exhausted from the restroom and the 1000 CFM that has been exhausted from the shower room be limited to only 10% of the 2000 CFM supply airstream? Reference: Section 403.3 and footnote h, Table 403.3, IMC 2006.
6. Clarify the air balance requirements for AC-2/HX-B and AC-9/HX-D with regard to the outside air quantities. Reference: Sections 106.3.1 and 403.3, IMC 2006.
7. Clarify the air balance requirements for AC-9/HX-D with regard to how only 200 CFM of the 600 CFM total restroom exhaust will be recirculated. Reference: Section 403.3 and footnote h, Table 403.3, IMC 2006.
8. Provide the manufacturer's installation data for the two dryers located in room 160 to justify the 8" dryer vents. Reference: Sections 504.4 and 504.7, IMC 2006.
9. Dryer vents shall not terminate with bird screen (8" vents, as shown on sheet m3.1). Reference: Section 504.4, IMC 2006.
10. A 4" dryer vent is shown near column J4 (Room 206) on sheet m1.2 and the termination of a 4" dryer vent is shown near column I6 on sheet m3.1. Are these dryer vents independent or is there just one 4" dryer vent?
11. The exhaust fan schedule notes that EF-3 and EF-4 are to be controlled by a "VAV hood EMS panel"; verify that the minimum duct velocities will comply with the requirements of Section 506.3.4, IMC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson.
12. Provide structural calculations and details to show that the Type I and Type II hoods are supported from the building structure in accordance with Section 507.6, IMC 2006. Reference: Section 302.1, IMC 2006.
13. Show that the Type I hood installations comply with Section 507.9, IMC 2006 with regard to a smooth, cleanable, non-absorbent, and non-combustible material installed between the hoods and the wall, and extending 18" beyond the hoods.
14. Positively pressurized exhaust ducts may not pass through a plenum (e.g. EF-10). Reference: Section 601.4, IMC 2006.
15. Show how the combustible ceiling/roof structure has been enclosed so that no combustible materials are exposed within the return air plenum. Reference: Section 602.2.1, IMC 2006.
01/23/2013 ELIZABETH LEIBOLD ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied TM Sec.2-01.2.1.A: Floodplain Use Permit application for the western building may be issued once the grading (DP12-0226) is approved, if the western building structure is only intended to be constructed. If the eastern building structure for the Transitional Family Apartments is also intended to be constructed, clarification of grades surrounding the structure will need to be reviewed and approved prior to issuance of Floodplain Use Permit.
02/06/2013 GERRY KOZIOL WWM REVIEW Denied NEED DP APPROVAL
NEED LOCATION & METHOD OF CONNECTION
NEED CAPACITY- KURT STEMM 740-6607
NEED TO SHOW SIZE AND LOCATION AND NUMBER OF WATER METERS
12/26/2012 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Approved PDSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: Precision Toyota of Tucson
T12CM08133
Building Plan (1st Review)

TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 26, 2012

1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed.

2. Zoning can not approve the building plan until a development plan has been approved.

3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved development plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956
12/31/2012 KEN BROUILLETTE FIRE REVIEW Denied 1. Door schedule does not match spec book. Many errors and they need to be reviewed by person submitting the drawings.
2. Exit signs need to be added to the electrical pages indicating the location of the exit path that was indicated on Sheet G1.3
3. Please indicate on door schedule all doors that will have delayed egress devices installed.
4. Spec number for door hardware is incorrect on Sheet A8.1
5. Cannot find doors 239A and B on door schedule that are indicated in Spec. Manual.
6. Is the wall between classroom 214 and 215 movable? If it is then the door swing will need to be adjusted for the greater occupant load.

Will continue review once these items are addressed.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
04/10/2013 FERNE RODRIGUEZ OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed