Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Permit Number - T12CM07970
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/02/2013 | BETH GRANT | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Approved | IMPACT FEE FOR OCCUPIED PORTION ONLY |
| 01/10/2013 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide tempered water for the lavatories using approved devices conforming to ASSE 1070. Reference: Section 416.5, IPC 2006. 2. The fixture connection sizes called out for the flush valves will result in water velocities greater than 8 FPS. Limit the water velocity to less than 8 FPS for the copper piping. Reference: Table 604.4, footnote (c), IPC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson. 3. Provide a vent for the sand/oil interceptor. Reference: Section 1003.9, IPC 2006. 4. Provide the roof drain design identified in keynote #3, CAR201. Reference: Section 106.3.1, IPC 2006. |
| 01/11/2013 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Show the size, routing, and termination of the drain for the evaporative cooler. Reference: Section 106.3.1, IMC 2006 as amended by the City of Tucson. |
| 01/11/2013 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 01/17/2013 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | T12CM07970 See comments for T12CM07061 |
| 01/30/2013 | CHAD AMATEAU | WWM | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1: NEED TO SUBMIT DP FOR PCRWRD APPROVAL - CHAD AMATEAU- 740-6547 2: NEED CAPACITY REVIEW - KURT STEMM - 740-6607 3: NEED PCRWRD/TWC REVIEW OF SAND & OIL INTERCEPTORS 4: NEED PCRWRD/IWC REVIEW OF LIFT STATION - 3035 W EL CAMINO DEL CERRO 5: NEED DEQ REVIEW OF THE ON-SITE PVT SEWER WITH LIFT STATION 6: NEED TO SHOW THE SIZES, LOCATION AND SERIAL NUMBER OF ALL EXISTING WATER METERS ON THE PROPERTY TO REMAIN, WITH DATES OF INSTALLATION. NEED TO SHOW THE SIZE, LOCATION AND SERIAL NUMBER OF ALL WATER METERS. NEED TO INDICATE THE SIZE AND LOCATION OF ALL PROPOSED WATER METERS, PER SEWER CONNNECTION FEE CALCULATION. |
| 12/20/2012 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 12/26/2012 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Precision Toyota of Tucson T12CM07961, T12CM07969 & T12CM07970 Building Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 26, 2012 1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning can not approve the building plan until a development package has been approved. 3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved development package. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 |
| 12/26/2012 | KEN BROUILLETTE | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/27/2012 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/28/2012 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SHEET CAR101; FLOOR PLAN: TWO SEPARATE NOTES BELOW GRID D INDICATE 'SHADE CANOPY BY OWNER'S VENDOR'. WILL THIS BE A DEFERRED SUBMITTAL UNDER THIS PROJECT'S ACTIVITY NUMBER, OR A NEW PROJECT? VERIFY. 2. SHEET CAR101; SOUTH ELEVATION: MOVE THE LIGHT FIXTURE (KEYNOTE 21) OVER THE DOUBLE DOOR TO THE PROPER LOCATION. 3. SHEET CAR101; WEST ELEVATION: KEYNOTE 21 OVER THE MAN DOOR IS CORRECT, BUT AN ARROW INDICATES A LIGHT FIXTURE ABOVE THAT. VERIFY. 4. SHEET CAR201; ROOF PLAN: THERE ARE THREE DETAILS (3, 5, AND 6/AR406) INDICATED IN SEVERAL LOCATIONS ON THIS PLAN. REVISE THE SHEET REFERENCE (NO SHEET AR406). 5. SHEET CAR301; WALL SECTION 2: A DETAIL 13/AR501 INDICATED AT THE TOP OF THE WALL IS NOT CORRECT. REVISE. 6. SHEET CAR301; KEYNOTES: KEYNOTES 17 AND 28 ARE DUPLICATES FOR THE SAME ITEM. VERIFY. 7. SHEET CAR301; KEYNOTES: KEYNOTES 20 AND 26 ARE DUPLICATES FOR THE SAME ITEM. VERIFY. 8. SHEET CSB101 (ROOF FRAMING PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET CW20): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE JOIST J1 SHOULD BE A 20K7 STEEL JOIST AT 8'-0" MAXIMUM CENTERS, WHILE THE PLAN INDICATES 20K4 JOISTS. CLARIFY. 9. SHEET CSB101 (FOUNDATION PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET CW51): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE WF2 (AS REFERENCED ON THE KEY PLAN ON SHEET CW26) SHOULD BE A 3'-6" WIDE FOOTING, WHILE THE PLAN (KEYNOTE 3 AND DETAIL 2/CSB501) INDICATES A 2'-4" WIDE FOOTING. IS THE KEY PLAN IN ERROR? CLARIFY. 10. SHEET CSB101; FOUNDATION PLAN: CLEAR UP THE VERBIAGE ON THE EXTERIOR DIMENSION LINE OF THE SOUTH WALL. 11. GENERAL: ALL DEFERRED SUBMITTALS MUST BE APPROVED IN WRITING BY RON BOOSE (BUILDING OFFICIAL) BEFORE THOSE SUBMITTALS WILL BE REVIEWED. RON.BOOSE@TUCSONAZ.GOV. 12. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 02/22/2013 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |