Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: T12CM07960
Parcel: 10408095C

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - TI ALL

Permit Number - T12CM07960
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - TI ALL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
08/16/2013 RONALD BROWN BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied COMMENT 2E:
1. Water heater detail on sheet PL510 notes a shelf mounted water heater. Please clarify and reconcile.
COMMENTS 4 AND 5:
2. The response note change is acceptable however the 2006 IBC Chapter 11 requires the 2003 ICC A117.1 for all accessiblility requirements not ADA. For future reference, all private projects are to comply with this accessibility code.
COMMENTS 9 AND 10:
3. As per the 2006 IBC, Section 1109.2, each toilet room shall be accessible with exceptions 1 through 6 as noted.
a. Toilet room 207 is for private use and may be modifed as per exceptions 1, 1.1, 1.2 1.3 and 1.4. Otherwise all other accessibility requirements apply.
b. However, toilet room 146 is available for common use as it is accessible from a Conference Room (a common area) and therefore must meet all accessibile requirements with no exceptions allowed.
c. Please reference comment response 2 above.
END OF REVIEW
08/19/2013 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Approved
08/19/2013 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Approved
08/20/2013 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Approved
08/22/2013 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied Provide documentation of the U-factors used for the exterior walls and roof that are labeled as "other" in the list of building components (see footnote b of Part 3 of the Envelope Compliance Certificate. [Initial comment: Provide energy code compliance calculations for the building envelope; use the climate zone for Pima County < 4,000 feet. Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation and the SHGC for the fenestration. Reference: Sections 101.4 and 104.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2006.]
08/29/2013 RAY MAJUTA ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied T12CM07960
700 W Wetmore #2
Toyota Sales Bldg

1. The Outdoor Lighting Code calculation is incorrect. Indicate which Option is to be used from Table 401.1 of The City if Tucson Outdoor Lighting Code. Your calculation shows
250,00 lumens per acre to be used, however 300,000 is shown multiplied per 7.126 acres.
2. Determine which fixtures are to be used for Special Use Lighting and show on plan. These fixtures are exemp per lumen count and color rated temperature of 3500K, however must meet curfew requirements.
Determine which fixtures are to be used for Security and indicate on plan, these fixtures are under the lumen count limited to color rated temperature of 3500K and not subject to curfew. A statement at bottom of your calculation indicates Security Lights marked by asterick, connot find these on plan.
3.Sheet EM201 circuits NCL9- 27,29 for CU1-06 show in EP602 panel schedule circuits 6,8 for CU1-06.

Ray T Majuta
Elect Plan Review
PDSD, Tucson
8/29/2013
Ray.Majuta@tucsonaz.gov
520/837/4988
09/12/2013 KEN BROUILLETTE FIRE REVIEW Approved

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
09/13/2013 CPIERCE1 REJECT SHELF Completed