Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Permit Number - T12CM07960
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/07/2013 | RONALD BROWN | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | GENERAL 1. Please provide certification of special inspectors for approval. 2. Please provide structural calculations for the following: a. All roof top mounted HVAC equipment. b. All suspended HVAC equipment c. Electrical light pole foundations. d. Flag pole foundations e. Wall hung water heaters including wall analysis SHEET AR102 3. Provide a 1 hour rating around the elevator equipment room as required by the 2006 IBC, section 3006.4. 4. Please provide casework elevations for all casework indicated "By Others" showing accessibility requirements. SHEET AR103 5. Ditto Comment 4. SHEET AR104 6. The 2 exits requirement shown for both the Training Room and the Lounge are non-compliant with the 2006 IBC, Sections 1015 and 1008.1.2. Please reconcile. SHEET AR401 7. Details 1, 3 and 7: The urinal stall must be 3'-0" wide as required by ICC A117.1, Sections 605 and 305. 8. Detail 3: In the woman's room #186, the required water closet clearance is being encroached upon by the lavatory. Please reconcile. 9. Details 5 and 9: Ditto comment 6. SHEET AR402 10. Detail 4: Ditto Comment 8 11. Detail 21: Ditto Comment 7 SHEET AR403 12. Detail 12: Ditto Comment 7 13. Detail 15: Ditto Comment 8 SHEET A404 14. Detail 14: Ditto Comment7 SHEET AR405 15. Detail 2: a. Extend the handrail at the top and bottom of the stair landings 12" similar to detail 10/AR508. b. Provide 18" clearance on the strike side of door 220A as per ICC A117.1, Section 404.2.3.1 (a). 16. Detail 3: Please show the extended handrail at the bottom of the stair landing. SHEET G1002 17. In order to fairly and properly assess permit and impact fees, an accurate square footage analaysis is required listing all the enclosed conditioned occupied space, the auto area only of the service bay area and the exterior canopy. 18. SHEET SB001; GENERAL NOTES: NOTE 18 INDICATES A SOIL REPORT NUMBER 63065198 AND AMENDMENTS. THE REPORT SUBMITTED WAS NUMBER 63065221. IS THIS AN AMENDED REPORT? 19. SHEET SB003; STEEL COLUMN SCHEDULE: COLUMNS C7, C8, C9, AND C13 INDICATE A BASE CONNECTION PER 2/SB004. REVISE THE CONNECTION REFERENCE. 20. SHEET SB102 (FOUNDATION PLAN); KEYNOTES: KEYNOTE 17 INDICATES A CANOPY AND FOUNDATION. WILL THIS BE ON ANOTHER PERMIT, OR A DEFERRED SUBMITTAL ON THIS PROJECT? 21. SHEET SB103 (FOUNDATION PLAN); SHEET SB502 (DETAIL 2): THIS DETAIL IS CUT IN TWO LOCATIONS ON GRID 17.8. IS THIS THE CORRECT DETAIL AT THAT LOCATION? VERIFY. 22. SHEET SF101 (FRAMING PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SECTION 3, PAGE 23): BEAM NUMBER B7 IN THE CALCULATIONS IS SIZED AS A W18X40 (APPROXIMATE 25' LENGTH), WHILE THE PLAN INDICATES A W18X35 (APPROXIMATE 25' LENGTH). CLARIFY. 23. SHEET SF103; FRAMING PLAN: A DETAIL 11/SF501 TYP. IS CUT AT THE WALL ON GRID A. SHOULD THIS BE 'SIM' RATHER THAN 'TYP'? VERIFY. 24. SHEET SF103 (FRAMING PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SECTION 2, PAGE 90): BEAM NUMBER B70 IN THE CALCULATIONS IS SIZED AS A W16X31 (APPROXIMATE 26'-6" LENGTH), WHILE THE PLAN INDICATES A W27X84 (APPROXIMATE 28'-0" LENGTH). CLARIFY. 25. SHEET SF508; DETAIL 5: REVISE THE TITLE. 26. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SECTION 2); PAGES 34 AND 35: BEAMS B192 AND B193 WERE NOT LOCATED ON THE KEY PLAN (PAGE 7)? VERIFY. 27. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SECTION 2); PAGE 36: BEAM B141 WAS NOT LOCATED IN THE CALCULATIONS. VERIFY. 28. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SECTION 2); PAGES 44 THROUGH 48: BEAMS B151. B152, B180, B182, AND B183 WERE NOT LOCATED ON THE KEY PLAN (PAGE 36). VERIFY. 29. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SECTION 2); PAGES 56 THROUGH 81: THESE BEAMS CAN NOT BE REVIEWED. THE BEAM NUMBERS ARE ILLEGIBLE. REVISE. 30. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SECTION 2); PAGE 84: BEAM B35 WAS NOT LOCATED ON THE KEY PLAN (PAGE 82). VERIFY. 31. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SECTION 2); PAGES 86 AND 87: BEAMS B37 AND B38 WERE NOT LOCATED ON THE KEY PLAN (PAGE 82). VERIFY. 32. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SECTION 2); PAGES 92 AND 93: BEAMS B72 AND B73 WERE NOT LOCATED ON THE KEY PLAN (PAGE 82). VERIFY. 33. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SECTION 2); PAGES 101 AND 102: BEAMS B108 AND B109 WERE NOT LOCATED ON THE KEY PLAN (PAGE 96). VERIFY. 34. GENERAL: IT APPEARS THE DESIGN OF SEVERAL ROOF BEAMS IS EITHER MISSING FROM THE CALCULATIONS, IN THE CALCULATIONS BUT ILLEGIBLE, OR PART OF A STRUCTURAL FRAME TO BE DESIGNED IN THE LATERAL SYSTEM (SECTION 5 OF THE CALCULATIONS). INCLUDE ALL ROOF BEAMS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS IN THE CALCULATIONS, NOTING IF BEAMS ARE SIMILAR TO OTHER DESIGNS OR PART OF THE LATERAL RESISTANCE SYSTEM. 35. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SECTION 3); PAGES 2 AND 3: JOISTS B41 AND B42 WERE NOT LOCATED ON THE KEY PLAN (PAGE 1). VERIFY. 36. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SECTION 3); PAGE 7: JOIST B155 WAS NOT LOCATED ON THE KEY PLAN (PAGE 1). VERIFY. 37. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SECTION 3); PAGES 39 THROUGH 53: BEAMS B26, B27, B38, B65, B83, B89, B90, B105, B106, B144, B146, B160, B161, B168, AND B169 WERE NOT LOCATED ON THE KEY PLAN (PAGE 19). VERIFY. 38. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SECTION 3); PAGES 56 AND 57: BEAM B175 WAS NOT LOCATED ON THE KEY PLAN (PAGE 19). VERIFY. 39. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SECTION 3); PAGES 61 THROUGH 76: BEAMS B183, B184, B187, B188, B189, B226, B231, B232, B233, B234, B235, AND B236 WERE NOT LOCATED ON THE KEY PLAN (PAGE 19). VERIFY. 40. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SECTION 3); PAGE 78: BEAM B240 WAS NOT LOCATED ON THE KEY PLAN (PAGE 19). VERIFY. 41. GENERAL: IT APPEARS THE DESIGN OF SEVERAL FLOOR BEAMS IS EITHER MISSING FROM THE CALCULATIONS OR PART OF A STRUCTURAL FRAME TO BE DESIGNED IN THE LATERAL SYSTEM (SECTION 5 OF THE CALCULATIONS). INCLUDE ALL FLOOR BEAMS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS IN THE CALCULATIONS, NOTING BEAMS ARE SIMILAR TO OTHER DESIGNS OR PART OF THE LATERAL RESISTENCE SYSTEM. 42. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SECTION 7); PAGE 12: LOCATE THE GRID LINES THIS COLUMN IS ON, AND ADD THAT NOTE TO THE CALCULATION. 43. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SECTION 7); PAGE 18: WHERE IS THIS COLUMN ON THE PLAN (NO COLUMN AT GRIDS 5 AND C.5)? 44. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SECTION 7); PAGES 19 THROUGH 22: LOCATE THE GRID LINES THESE COLUMNS ARE ON, AND PLACE ON THE CALCULATIONS. 45. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SECTION 7); PAGE 29: WHERE IS THIS COLUMN ON THE PLAN (NO COLUMN AT GRIDS 6 AND C.5)? 46. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SECTION 7); PAGE 30: LOCATE THE GRID LINES THIS COLUMN IS ON, AND PLACE ON THE CALCULATIONS. 47. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SECTION 7); PAGE 31: WHERE IS THIS COLUMN ON THE PLAN (NO COLUMN AT GRIDS 6.7 AND C.5)? 48. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SECTION 7); PAGES 38 THROUGH 40: LOCATE THE GRID LINES THIS COLUMN IS ON, AND PLACE ON THE CALCULATIONS. 49. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SECTION 7); PAGE 41: WHERE IS THIS COLUMN ON THE PLAN (NO COLUMN AT GRIDS 7.4 AND C.4)? 50. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SECTION 7); PAGES 47 AND 48: WHERE IS THIS COLUMN ON THE PLAN (NO COLUMN AT GRIDS 8.3 AND C.4 OR GRIDS 8.5 AND C.6)? 51. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SECTION 7); PAGE 55: WHERE IS THIS COLUMN ON THE PLAN (NO COLUMN AT GRIDS 9 AND C.6)? 52. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SECTION 7); PAGE 59: WHERE IS THIS COLUMN ON THE PLAN (NO COLUMN AT GRIDS 9.9 AND C.6)? 53. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SECTION 7); PAGE 75: WHERE IS THIS COLUMN ON THE PLAN (NO COLUMN AT GRIDS 11 AND C.7)? 54. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SECTION 7); PAGES 82 THROUGH 87: LOCATE THE GRID LINES THESE COLUMNS ARE ON, AND PLACE ON THE CALCULATIONS. 55. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SECTION 7); PAGE 92: THIS SUMMARY SHEET INCLUDES COLUMNS TO GRID 12. WHERE ARE THE CALCULATIONS FOR COLUMNS EAST OF GRID 12? 56. GENERAL: ANY DEMOLITION ON THIS PROJECT WILL REQUIRE A SEPARATE PERMIT. 57. GENERAL: IS THE ENTRY PORTAL STRUCTURE A DEFERRED SUBMITTAL? VERIFY. 58. GENERAL: ALL DEFERRED SUBMITTALS MUST BE APPROVED IN WRITING BY RON BOOSE (BUILDING OFFICIAL) BEFORE THOSE SUBMITTALS WILL BE REVIEWED. RON.BOOSE@TUCSONAZ.GOV. 59. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. END OF COMMENTS |
| 01/08/2013 | BETH GRANT | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Approved | Need accurate square footage analysis to properly determine the correct impact fees. |
| 01/14/2013 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Verify the specifications for the urinal; according to the manufacturer, the specified unit is a siphon jet, not a washout type flushing system. 2. Provide tempered water for the lavatories using approved devices conforming to ASSE 1070. Reference: Section 416.5, IPC 2006. 3. Show that the back-to-back installation of water closets (detail 6/PL700) complies with the requirements of Section 706.3, IPC 2006. 4. Verify that the proposed horizontal rainwater leaders located along column line H are adequately sized (e.g. maximum coverage area for a 6" horizontal leader at 1% slope is 7,133 square feet). Reference: Section 1106.3, IPC 2006. 5. Provide gas pipe sizing calculations demonstrating conformance to Section 402.1 and 402.3, IFGC 2006. |
| 01/14/2013 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Clarify the basis for the water fixture unit and the water demand calculations; the data doesn't correspond to the referenced IPC tables. 2. Verify the water demand that will be seen by the proposed 2" water meter. Tucson Water limits 2" meters to a maximum flow of 120 GPM, not the 127 GPM presented in the water calculations. |
| 01/15/2013 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide energy code compliance calculations for the building envelope; use the climate zone for Pima County < 4,000 feet. Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. The information on the drawing shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation and the SHGC for the fenestration. Reference: Sections 101.4 and 104.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2006. 2. Provide structural details to show how the fan coil units are to be connected to the building structure. Reference: Section 302.1, IMC 2006. 3. Revise the condensate drain system pipe sizes per Section 307.2.2, IMC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson. 4. Provide calculations to show how natural ventilation has been provided in the locations noted on the DX Split System Schedule. Reference: Section 402, IMC 2006. 5. Revise the mechanical design as required to avoid using a corridor as a return air duct. Reference: Section 601.2, IMC 2006. 6. The area above the hung ceilings appears to be a return air plenum; positively pressurized exhaust ducts may not pass through a plenum. Reference: Section 601.4, IMC 2006. 7. Provide smoke detectors in the return air duct, upstream of any outside air connections, for all air distribution systems with a capacity greater than 2,000 CFM. Reference: Section 606.1, IMC 2006. 8. Duct smoke detectors shall be connected to the building fire alarm system. Reference: Section 606.4.1, IMC 2006. |
| 01/22/2013 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | T12CM07960 Phase 2 700 W Wetmore Precision Toyota 1. Sheet ES101, circuits FOL8- 36 used for power, spare in panel, circuit FOL6-14 same as previous. 2. Sheet ESL101-A, indicate which fixtures will be used for security. The 2012 Outdoor lighting Code no longer has a 300,000 lumen per acre chart. 3. Following circuits are used in plans however marked as spares in panels: NCL2-51,53,55 NCL6-16,23,25,27,29 NCL5-14 4. The following circuits were found in the panel schedules not in the plans, NCH1-1 thur 31 odd 2 thur 8, 20,36,38,40 NCM2- 1,3,5,31,33,35,20,22,24 NCL1-13,15,48,50 NCL2-3,17,19,21,43,49 20 thur 34 even NCL3- 1 thur 9 odd,2 thur 8 even, 16 thur 22 even, 36 thur 40 even 21,31 thur 39 odd,49,52 NCL8-19,21,23,25 NCL9- 6,8 CNCL1-1,3 FOH2- 7 thur 33 odd, 18 thur 40 even FOL3-1 thur 29 odd,2 thur 30 even FOL8-1 thur 35 odd, 2 thur 34 even. Could these be marked for a different phase of job ? 5. Sheet EP701, indicate AIC rating of MDC, NCDB #1 and 2 6. In following Panels, the FC analysis values do not coinside with listings in panels: NCL4, NCL5, NCL8, CNCL1. 7. Sheet EP701, indicate a Selective Coordination report is required per 620.62. for elevator. 8. Sheet EP701, Transformer NCT 1 and 2, the Greounding Electrode Conductor is too small. 9. Size the GEC for the 75 KVA transformer. 10. Sheet EP701, the OCD for Panel NCM2 is 250 amps, should be 225 amps. 11. Sheet EP701, should the 1/0 cu GEC for MDB-3 be 3/0 cu ? 12. Sheet EP701,indicate report for MDB-3 on GFP to be provided to AJH. Please provide a review and comment list on items above. Ray T Majuta Elect Plan Review PDSD, City of Tucson 1/22/2013 Ray.Majuta@tucsonaz.gov |
| 01/30/2013 | CHAD AMATEAU | WWM | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1: NEED TO SUBMIT DP FOR PCRWRD APPROVAL - CHAD AMATEAU- 740-6547 2: NEED CAPACITY REVIEW - KURT STEMM - 740-6607 3: NEED PCRWRD/TWC REVIEW OF SAND & OIL INTERCEPTORS 4: NEED PCRWRD/IWC REVIEW OF LIFT STATION - 3035 W EL CAMINO DEL CERRO 5: NEED DEQ REVIEW OF THE ON-SITE PVT SEWER WITH LIFT STATION 6: NEED TO SHOW THE SIZES, LOCATION AND SERIAL NUMBER OF ALL EXISTING WATER METERS ON THE PROPERTY TO REMAIN, WITH DATES OF INSTALLATION. NEED TO SHOW THE SIZE, LOCATION AND SERIAL NUMBER OF ALL WATER METERS. NEED TO INDICATE THE SIZE AND LOCATION OF ALL PROPOSED WATER METERS, PER SEWER CONNNECTION FEE CALCULATION. |
| 12/21/2012 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 12/26/2012 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Precision Toyota of Tucson T12CM07961, T12CM07969, T12CM07970, T12CM07960 & T12CM07967 Building Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 26, 2012 1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning can not approve the building plan until a development package has been approved. 3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved development package. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 |
| 12/26/2012 | KEN BROUILLETTE | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | The exiting on the second floor from the lounge and the training room needs to be reconfigured. Both rooms require two exits and both need the door to swing in the direction of exit travel. |
| 12/27/2012 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 02/22/2013 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |