Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T12CM07902
Parcel: 13101002L

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: CELL TOWER/ANTENNAS

Permit Number - T12CM07902
Review Name: CELL TOWER/ANTENNAS
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
02/11/2013 MICHAEL ST. PAUL ZONING REVIEW Approved
02/22/2013 ERIC NEWCOMB BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. PREVIOUS COMMENT: THE STRUCTURAL ANANLYSIS AND PROJECT DRAWINGS ARE CONFUSING. THE COVER LETTER FOR THE CALCULATIONS (STAMPED BY ANDREW T. HALDANE, PE) INDICATES THE STRUCTURAL CAPACITY (MODIFIED WITH PROPOSED EQUIPMENT) IS 92.6% (SUFFICIENT CAPACITY). THEN PAGES 4 AND 5 OF THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE THE POLE, EXISTING ANCHOR BOLTS, REINFORCING RODS, BASE PLATE, AND FOUNDATION PASS THE ANALYSIS. NOT UNTIL WE GET TO THE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS APPENDIX D DO WE KNOW A STRUCTURAL MODIFICATION IS BEING ADDED (SHEETS T-1, N-1, N-2, N-3, N-4, N-5, S-1, S-2, AND S-3). THESE SAME SHEETS ARE INCLUDED IN THE SUBMITTAL DRAWINGS. CLARIFY. AT WHAT POINT IN THE CALCULATIONS IS IT DETERMINED THAT THE EXISTING POLE, BASE PLATE, AND ANCHORS NEED TO BE REVISED?
2. SHEETS A-7, A-8, A-9, AND A-10: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE THESE SHEETS.
3. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
03/14/2013 CPIERCE1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
03/14/2013 CPIERCE1 REJECT SHELF Completed