Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Permit Number - T12CM07876
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/03/2013 | KEN BROUILLETTE | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | Same concerns as building on exiting. I'll wait for resub after building comments are addressed. -KB |
| 01/04/2013 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Is water being supplied to the car wash? 2. Include all fixtures and the water requirements of the HVAC equipment (e.g. the evaporative coolers) when calculating the total demand and determining pipe sizes. Note that wash fountains with multiple stations are counted as 2 water fixture units per set of faucets (similarly, Table 709.1 in the 2006 IPC also uses 2 drainage fixture units per set of faucets). Reference: Section Appendix A, UPC 2006. 3. The water distribution calculations are based on a service pressure of 80 PSI which, according to Appendix A, UPC 2006 requires that the 80 PSI is the minimum daily service pressure. If so, then logically the maximum daily pressure must be in excess of 80 PSI and a pressure regulator will be required. Verify the range of the water service pressure and install a regulator if the water service pressure will exceed 80 PSI. 4. Provide tempered water for the wash fountains, P9 and P9A using approved devices conforming to ASSE 1070. Reference: Section 416.5, IPC 2006. 5. Provide cleanouts in the building sewer at intervals not exceeding 100 feet (see sheet 11 of 18). Reference: Section 708.3.2, IPC 2006. 6. Provide sizing calculations for the overflow roof scuppers. Include the contributory flow from adjacent roof areas as appropriate. Reference: Sections 1106 and 1107.3, IPC 2006. |
| 01/04/2013 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 01/07/2013 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Revise the size of the condensate drains to comply with the requirements of Section 307.2, IMC 2006 as amended by the City of Tucson. 2. Clarify the size and termination for the condensate drain from FC-1. Reference: Section 307.2, IMC 2006 as amended by the City of Tucson. 3. Clarify the size of the condensate drain from FC-3. Reference: Section 307.2, IMC 2006 as amended by the City of Tucson. 4. Provide a design for the source-capture exhaust system for operating motor vehicles. Reference: Section 502.14, IMC 2006. |
| 01/10/2013 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 01/17/2013 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | NEEDS APPROVED DP12-0161 NEEDS CAPACITY 82.5 FU'S NEED SIZE, LOCATION & NUMBER OF W.M. FOR CREDIT IF APPLICABLE |
| 12/13/2012 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 12/14/2012 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Subaru T12CM07876 Building Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 14, 2012 1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning can not approve the building plan until a development package has been approved by all PDSD agencies. 3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved development package. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 |
| 12/19/2012 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SHEET DO: IS THERE A PREVIOUS PERMIT FOR THE DEMOLITION OF THE EXISTING BUILDING? VERIFY. 2. SHEET A1; FLOOR PLANS: SECTION 9/A10 IS CUT ON BOTH PLANS. REVISE THE SHEET REFERENCE. 3. SHEET A2; FIRST FLOOR PLAN: SHOULD THE DOOR MARKED 35A OPEN IN THE OPPOSITE DIRECTION FROM WHAT IS INDICATED PER IBC SECTION 1008.1.2? WOULD THAT SWING INTERFERE WITH EXITING THROUGH DOOR 39? VERIFY. 4. SHEET A2; FIRST FLOOR PLAN: A NOTE IN BREAK ROOM 36 INDICATES A REFERENCE TO 4/A2. REVISE THAT REFERENCE. 5. SHEET A2 (FIRST FLOOR PLAN); LEGEND: THE WALLS INDICATED IN THE LEGEND ARE NOT CALLED OUT ON THE PLAN. PROVIDE. 6. SHEET A3 (FIRST FLOOR PLAN); LEGEND: THE WALLS INDICATED IN THE LEGEND ARE NOT CALLED OUT ON THE PLAN. PROVIDE. 7. SHEET A3; FIRST FLOOR PLAN: EXITING FROM THE DETAILING AREA (ROOM 44) PASSES THROUGH OFFICE 43. THIS IS NOT ALLOWED PER IBC SECTION 1014.2(3). VERIFY. 8. SHEET A3; INTERIOR PARTITION 2: PROVIDE THE METAL STUD BRACE SIZE AND CONNECTORS (SIZE AND QUANTITY) TO THE TOP OF THE PARTITION WALL AND TO THE STRUCTURE ABOVE. 9. SHEET A4 (SECOND FLOOR PLAN); LEGEND: THE WALLS INDICATED IN THE LEGEND ARE NOT CALLED OUT ON THE PLAN. PROVIDE. 10. SHEET A5; ELEVATION 2: A NOTE ON TOP OF THE ELEVATION REFERENCES 6/A17 AT THE VISION SCREEN. REVISE THAT REFERENCE. 11. SHEET A6; BUILDING SECTION A: PROVIDE A DRYWALL REFERENCE TO THE NOTE IN THE MIDDLE OF THE SECTION. 12. SHEET A9; WALL SECTION 6: A DETAIL AT THE JOIST BEARING REFERENCES 6/A5. REVISE THAT REFERENCE. 13. SHEET A17; STAIR PLAN 1: THE FILES ROOM IS DESIGNATED AS ROOM 55. REVISE THAT NUMBER. 14. SHEET A18; SECTION 6: THE COUNTERS AND SINKS MUST BE ACCESSIBLE PER IBC SECTION 1109.3 AND 1109.11. REVISE COUNTER HEIGHT. 15. SHEET S1.1: ADD A NOTE TO REFERENCE SHEET S1.2 FOR THE COLUMN AND FOOTING SCHEDULES. 16. SHEET S1.1; KEYNOTES: ADD A NOTE THAT INDICATES PLAN KEYNOTES MAY APPEAR ON S1.1 OR S1.2. 17. SHEET S1.1; KEYNOTES: ADD VERBIAGE TO NOTE 3 INDICATING TO SEE SHEET S1.2 FOR TOP OF FOOTING NOTES. 18. SHEET S1.2; KEYNOTES: ADD A NOTE THAT INDICATES PLAN KEYNOTES MAY APPEAR ON S1.1 OR S1.2. 19. SHEET S2.1; DETAIL 15: A NOTE ON THE DETAIL INDICATES TO SEE THE PLAN FOR THE CONCRETE PIER SIZE. THAT SIZE WAS NOT LOCATED. VERIFY. 20. SHEET S2.2; DETAIL 9: THE WORD "RETAINING" SHOULD BE REMOVED FROM THE UPPER PORTION OF THE WALL (5'-0" MAX.). 21. SHEET S3.1; FLOOR FRAMING PLAN: A DETAIL 13/S4.1 IS CUT AT THE SOUTH STAIR. IS THIS CORRECT? 22. SHEET S3.1; FLOOR FRAMING PLAN: A DETAIL 15/S4.3 IS CUT ON GRID F. IS THIS CORRECT? 23. SHEET S3.2 (ROOF FRAMING PLAN); SHEET S4.1 (DETAIL 3): DETAIL 3 ON S4.1 INDICATES A 8" CMU WALL, BUT THE DETAIL IS CUT AT A 12" CMU WALL ON GRID B. VERIFY. 24. SHEET S3.3 (ROOF FRAMING PLAN); SHEET S4.2 (DETAIL 8): DETAIL 8 ON S4.2 INDICATES A 12" CMU WALL, BUT THE DETAIL IS CUT AT A 8" CMU WALL ON GRID 1.9. VERIFY. 25. SHEET S4.1 (STEEL LINTEL SCHEDULE); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 17): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE LT1 SHOULD HAVE 2-#5 IN 3 CELLS AT THE LINTEL BEARING, BUT THE LINTEL SCHEDULE INDICATES A 12" END BEARING LENGTH (ONLY 2 AVAILABLE CELLS MAXIMUM). REFERENCE THE FOUNDATION PLAN KEYNOTES FOR THESE CONDITIONS. 26. SHEET S4.1 (STEEL LINTEL SCHEDULE); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 18): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE LT4 SHOULD HAVE 1-#6 IN THREE CELLS AT THE LINTEL BEARING, BUT THE LINTEL SCHEDULE INDICATES A 12" END BEARING LENGTH (2 AVAILABLE CELLS MAXIMUM). REFERENCE THE FOUNDATION PLAN KEYNOTES FOR THESE CONDITIONS. 27. SHEET S4.3; DETAILS: THERE ARE TWO DETAILS DENOTED 8. REVISE. 28. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 12/19/2012 | BETH GRANT | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Approved | |
| 12/27/2012 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 02/08/2013 | GERARDO BONILLA | REJECT SHELF | Completed |