Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T12CM07840
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/29/2013 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | RESUBMITTAL REVIEW COMMENTS ARE PROVIDED IN ALL CAPS COMMENT 1: PLEASE REMOVE THE REFERENCE TO THE ARIZONA STATUES FOR ACCESSIBILITY COMMENT 11: WHERE IS EPOXY PAINTED GYPSUM BOARD USED ON THIS SHEET OF INTERIOR ELEVATIONS? PLEASE REFERENCE OR DELETE THE NOTE. COMMENT 21: THE CAD LAYER FOR THE BENCH OUTLINE NEEDS TO BE ACTIVATED. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: SHEET A2.1 1. Please provide a large scale detail of the concrete steps showing all required dimensions, riser and treads, elevation diferences, handrails and handrail elevations. SHEET A2.2 2. Detail 3, please clarify the 7'-4" height dimension in both the elevation and floor plan. Something is not correct here between the two. SHEET A2.6 3. DETAIL 18: Provide a 3'-0" wide urinal stall as per ICC A117.1, Sections 605 and 305. 4. Provide a general note for all exposed lavatory piping to be insulated as required by ICC A117.1, section 606.6. 5. At detail 11, the toilets are not accessible as there is no space available for a 5'-0" turn around as required by ICC A117.1, Section 603.2.1. 6. At detail 7, both lavs could be moved further West to provide more access to the water closet. SHEET A2.7 7. At detail 18: provide 1 accessible stall. SHEET A6.1 8. At detail 02: provide a 3'-0" wide urnial stall as per ICC A117.1, Section 605 and 305. 9. At detail 1, please provide the standard water dispenser spout heights as required by the 2006 IBC, Section 1109.5.1 and ICC A117.1, Sections 602.4 and 5. 10. At the Restroom Elevation Key Notes: As per Sheet G1.1, ICC A117.1, 2003 Edition is the governing accessibility code. Please delete all reference to ADA and substitute the quoted accessibility code. END OF REVIEW |
| 02/04/2013 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide overflow protection for the roof of the campus restrooms. [Original comment: Revise the size of the proposed roof scuppers to comply with the requirements of Section 1101.11.2.1, UPC 2006. Provide overflow protection for the roof. Note that the minimum dimension of a scupper is 4".] 2. Comment not addressed; see Section 1611.1, IBC 2006. [Original comment: Provide calculations to verify that the "slotted metal gravel stop" located in the scupper in detail 7/A4.2 has been included in the determination of the required scupper width. Reference: Section 101.11.2.1, UPC 2006.] |
| 02/04/2013 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Clarify the continuous insulation shown for the walls of the building; the drawings do not show any continuous insulation. [Original comment: Revise the envelope energy calculations for the physical education building to reflect the construction shown on the drawings. In some locations the building roof has continuous insulation and in other areas the roof has batt insulation in the cavity, but not both insulation types for the same roof area and no walls are shown with R-13 cavity insulation.] 2. Clarify the continuous insulation shown for the walls of the building; the drawings do not show any continuous insulation. [Original comment: Provide separate envelope energy calculations for the physical education restroom building. Revise the calculations to reflect the construction shown on the drawings. The drawings show that the building roof has batt insulation in the roof cavity but no continuous roof insulation. No walls are shown with any continuous insulation.] 3. Provide documentation to support the proposed U-factor for the "other" roof construction (see footnote b for Section 3 of the Envelope Compliance Certificate). Clarify the continuous insulation shown for the walls of the building; the drawings do not show any continuous insulation. [Original comment: Revise the envelope energy calculations for the campus restroom building to reflect the construction shown on the drawings. The drawings show that the building roof is constructed with a metal deck over steel joists and has batt insulation in the roof cavity but no continuous roof insulation.] 4. Provide documentation to support the proposed U-factor for the "other" roof construction (see footnote b for Section 3 of the Envelope Compliance Certificate). Clarify the continuous insulation shown for the walls of the building; the drawings do not show any continuous insulation. [Original comment: Revise the envelope energy calculations for the restroom additions to reflect the construction shown on the drawings. The drawings show that the building roofs are constructed with a wood deck over wood joists with batt insulation in the roof cavity. No continuous roof insulation is shown.] |
| 02/20/2013 | LEERAY HANLY | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Original correction comment #2 unresolved. "Provide site lighting information to show compliance with the Outdoor Lighting Code." Added note on page E1.1 is insufficient. This plan set does not meet the exeptions noted. Please refer to the 2012 Outdoor Lighting Code as adopted by the City of Tucson in February of 2012. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 02/26/2013 | CPIERCE1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |