Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI
Permit Number - T12CM07840
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/02/2013 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Clarify the size of the upstream and downstream cleanouts for the proposed gravity grease interceptor; plumbing plan 2/P2.1 shows 3" cleanouts but detail 3/P4.1 shows 4" cleanouts. Reference: Sections 316.4.1 and 707.11, UPC 2006. 2. Appliances (e.g. ice makers) to be directly connected to the water supply system that do not have listed, integral backflow preventers or integral air gaps conforming to Table 6-3, UPC 2006 require backflow prevention. Specify the type of backflow prevention device required for each water connection. Reference: Sections 602.3, 603.0, and Table 6-2, UPC 2006. 3. A dual check valve (detail 2/P2.2) is not acceptable for protecting the water supply to a carbonator. See the plumbing fixture schedule (Physical Education Facility, P5.1) for the correct backflow protection device. Reference: Section 603.4.12, UPC 2006. 4. Provide a direct waste connection for the wash and rinse sections of the 3-compartment sink (K-14), with an indirect connection for the sanitizing compartment only. Reference: Sections 304.0, 704.3, and 801.2.3, UPC 2006. 5. Each vent pipe shall rise vertically to a minimum of 6" above the flood-level rim of the fixture it serves before offsetting horizontally (e.g. FD-1 fixtures that are within five feet of a wall). Coordinate with the structural design on the new buildings and building additions. Reference: Section 905.3, UPC 2006. 6. Provide protection of the trap seals for all floor drains subject to infrequent use. Reference: Sections 316.4.1, 1004.0, 1007.0, and 1007.1, UPC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson. 7. Revise the size of the proposed roof scuppers to comply with the requirements of Section 1101.11.2.1, UPC 2006. Provide overflow protection for the roof. Note that the minimum dimension of a scupper is 4". 8. Provide the sizes of the downspouts for the gutters. Reference: Section 1106.0, UPC 2006. 9. Revise the sizing calculations for the gutters and downspouts for the Phys Ed Restroom building. Include the slope of the gutter. Reference: Section 1106.0, UPC 2006. 10. Clarify the roof drainage design for the campus restrooms; the calculations refer to gutters but the roof plan shows a scupper. 11. Provide calculations to show that the overflow opening in detail 7/A4.2 has at least the same capacity as the specified roof scupper. Reference: 1101.11.2.2, UPC 2006. 12. Provide calculations to verify that the "slotted metal gravel stop" located in the scupper in detail 7/A4.2 has been included in the determination of the required scupper width. Reference: Section 101.11.2.1, UPC 2006. 13. Show the natural gas piping system that is to be revised to install unit heater UH-5-1; provide all of the connected loads and the developed lengths from the meter to the gas-fired appliances. Reference: Sections 103.2.3, 1209.1.1, and 1209.1.2, UPC 2006. |
| 01/02/2013 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 01/03/2013 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. For all of the new buildings and the building additions, provide energy code compliance calculations for the building envelopes using the climate zone for Pima County < 4,000 feet (the town of Pima, Arizona is located in Graham County). Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelopes. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation and the SHGC for the fenestration. Reference: Sections 101.4 and 104.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2006. 2. Revise the envelope energy calculations for the ticket booth to reflect the construction shown on the drawings. The booth does not have an attic roof with wood joists, it does not have any continuous roof insulation, the R-value for the batt insulation in the roof cavity is not called out, the window on the north wall is not shown in the calculations, and the SHGF and U-value for the south window is not shown on the drawings. 3. Revise the envelope energy calculations for the physical education building to reflect the construction shown on the drawings. In some locations the building roof has continuous insulation and in other areas the roof has batt insulation in the cavity, but not both insulation types for the same roof area and no walls are shown with R-13 cavity insulation. 4. Provide separate envelope energy calculations for the physical education restroom building. Revise the calculations to reflect the construction shown on the drawings. The drawings show that the building roof has batt insulation in the roof cavity but no continuous roof insulation. No walls are shown with any continuous insulation. 5. Revise the envelope energy calculations for the physical education building to reflect the construction shown on the drawings. In some locations the building roof has continuous insulation and in other areas the roof has batt insulation in the cavity, but not both insulation types for the same roof area and no walls are shown with R-13 cavity insulation. 6. Revise the envelope energy calculations for the campus restroom building to reflect the construction shown on the drawings. The drawings show that the building roof is constructed with a metal deck over steel joists and has batt insulation in the roof cavity but no continuous roof insulation. 7. Revise the envelope energy calculations for the restroom additions to reflect the construction shown on the drawings. The drawings show that the building roofs are constructed with a wood deck over wood joists with batt insulation in the roof cavity. No continuous roof insulation is shown. 8. Revise the duct construction specifications to comply with the joint sealing requirements of Section 503.2.7, IECC 2006. |
| 01/10/2013 | LEERAY HANLY | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide IECC compliance certificate for new building. 2. Provide site lighting information to show compliance with the Outdoor Lighting Code. |
| 01/15/2013 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/14/2012 | LAITH ALSHAMI | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/19/2012 | KEN BROUILLETTE | FIRE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | Approval is subject to State Fire Marshal Approval. This shall be provided to the fire department. |
| 12/24/2012 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SHEET G1.1; APPLICABLE CODES: REVISE THE ACCESSIBILITY CODE TO THE ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003. 2. SHEET G1.1; APPLICABLE CODES: REVISE THE FIRE CODE TO THE 2006 IFC. 3. SHEET G1.1; APPLICABLE CODES: REVISE THE ELECTRICAL CODE TO THE 2005 NEC. 4. SHEET D0.1; DEMOLITION KEYNOTES: KEYNOTES 1 AND 4 WERE NOT LOCATED ON THE PLAN. VERIFY. 5. SHEET D0.1; DEMOLITION KEYNOTES: NOTES 14 AND 15 ARE REVERSED ON THE SITE DEMOLITION PLAN. REVISE. 6. SHEET A0.1: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE THE ENLARGED PLAN SHEET NUMBER REFERENCES. 7. SHEET A0.1; SITE PLAN KEYNOTES: REVISE THE REFERENCE (2/A0.4) IN NOTE 5 FOR THE TRASH ENCLOSURE. 8. SHEET A0.1; SITE PLAN KEYNOTES: KEYNOTES 7 AND 28 WERE NOT LOCATED ON THE PLAN. VERIFY. 9. SHEET A0.2; SITE PLAN KEYNOTES: KEYNOTE 14 WAS NOT LOCATED ON THE PLAN. VERIFY. 10. SHEET A0.3; PARTIAL SITE PLAN: THE RESTROOM DETAIL REFERENCE ON THE PLAN INDICATES 15 AND 16/A2.6. REVISE THE DETAIL REFERENCE (15 AND 18?). 11. SHEET A2.2; RESTROOM ELEVATION KEYNOTES: KEYNOTE 12 WAS NOT LOCATED ON THE ELEVATIONS. VERIFY. 12. SHEET A2.3; ELEVATION 9: COMPLETE THE KEYNOTE REFERENCE AT THE TOP OF THE WALL. 13. SHEET A2.3; ELEVATION 8: INDICATE THE VERTICAL GRAB BAR AT KEYNOTE 7. 14. SHEET A2.3; RESTROOM ELEVATION KEYNOTES: KEYNOTE 8 WAS NOT LOCATED ON THE ELEVATION. VERIFY. 15. SHEET A2.4; RESTROOM ELEVATION KEYNOTES: KEYNOTES 4 AND 8 WERE NOT LOCATED ON THE ELEVATIONS. VERIFY. 16. SHEET A2.5; FLOOR PLAN GENERAL NOTES: NOTE 5 IS LISTED TWICE. REVISE. 17. SHEET A2.6; DEMOLITION KEYNOTES: KEYNOTE 7 WAS NOT LOCATED ON THE PLANS. VERIFY. 18. SHEET A2.7; DEMOLITION KEYNOTES: KEYNOTES 3, 7, 10, 11, 12, AND 13 WERE NOT LOCATED ON THE ELEVATIONS. VERIFY. 19. SHEET A2.9; DEMOLITION KEYNOTES: KEYNOTES 4, 6, AND 9 WERE NOT LOCATED ON THE PLAN. VERIFY. 20. SHEET A2.10; DEMOLITION KEYNOTES: KEYNOTES 4, 6, 7, 8, AND 9 WERE NOT LOCATED ON THE PLAN. VERIFY. 21. SHEET A5.3 (SECTIONS 1 AND 2); SHEET A10.1 (DETAIL 14): THE BENCH DETAIL ON SHEET A10.1 DOES NOT MATCH THE BENCH DEPICTED ON THE WALL SECTIONS ON SHEET A5.3. CLARIFY. 22. SHEET A5.3; SECTION 2: CLARIFY THE DETAIL NUMBER AT THE FLOATING ROOF PEAK. 23. SHEET A6.1; ELEVATION 20: INDICATE THE PAPER DISPENSER. 24. SHEET A6.1; RESTROOM ELEVATION KEYNOTES: KEYNOTE 9 WAS NOT LOCATED ON THE ELEVATIONS. VERIFY. 25. SHEET A6.2; RESTROOM ELEVATION KEYNOTES: KEYNOTE 9 WAS NOT LOCATED ON THE ELEVATIONS. VERIFY. 26. SHEET A7.1 (ELEVATION 8); SHEET A10.1 (DETAIL 14): THE BENCH DETAIL ON SHEET A10.1 DOES NOT MATCH THE BENCH DEPICTED ON THE ELEVATION ON SHEET A7.1. CLARIFY. 27. SHEET S1.1 (PHYSICAL EDUCATION FACILITY FOUNDATION PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 15): COLUMN C1 IN THE CALCULATIONS (HSS4X4X 1/4) DOES NOT SHOW UP ON THE FOUNDATION PLAN, BUT DOES APPEAR IN THE COLUMN SCHEDULE. CLARIFY. 28. SHEET S1.1; FOUNDATION PLANS 1 AND 2: ADD THE FOOTING MARK F1 TO THE INTERIOR CMU WALL FOOTINGS (IN SEVERAL LOCATIONS). 29. SHEET S1.1 (PHYSICAL EDUCATION FACILITY FOUNDATION PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS: NO CALCULATIONS WERE LOCATED FOR THE CMU SCREEN WALL OR FOUNDATION DEPICTED IN DETAIL 6/S2.1. VERIFY. 30. SHEET S3.1 (TICKET BOOTH/RESTROOM FRAMING PLANS); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS: LINTEL LT1 INDICATED IN THE CALCULATIONS (3 LOCATIONS) DOES NOT INDICATE A SIZE OF THE LINTEL ON THE PLAN. PROVIDE A REFERENCE TO 7/S4.1. 31. SHEET S3.2; ROOF FRAMING PLANS: ADD A REFERENCE ON THE PLANS FOR THE LINTEL SIZES (7/S4.1). 32. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01/16/2013 | CPIERCE1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |
| 01/15/2013 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |