Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI
Permit Number - T12CM07745
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/04/2013 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | |
| 01/04/2013 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/07/2012 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Needs Review | |
| 12/07/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Revise the ventilation calculations to take into account the different occupancy loads in the project space (e.g. a tailor shop is not a storage room). Reference: Sections 403.3 and 403.3.2, IMC 2006. 2. Revise the ASHRAE ventilation calculations to include an air distribution effectiveness value of 0.8 (ceiling supply, ceiling return, warm air greater than 15 degrees Fahrenheit above space temperature). Reference: Section 6.2.2.2, ASHRAE Standard 62.1-2004. 3. Revise the sequence of operation for the restroom exhaust fans so that that all of the air supplied to the restrooms will be exhausted. Reference: Section 403.2.1 (4), IMC 2006. 4. The rooftop units are scheduled as being new; provide the installed weight of the units, show how they are to be installed, and provide structural calculations to verify that the existing roof is capable of supporting the additional dead load due to the installation of the roof top units. Reference: Section 302.1, IMC 2006. 5. Show the size, routing, and termination of the condensate drains. Reference: Section 307.2, IMC 2006 as amended by the City of Tucson and Section 814.0, UPC 2006. 6. Verify that the existing roof structure is constructed of non-combustible materials. Reference: Sections 106.3.1 and 602.2.1, IMC 2006. 7. Specify the minimum resistance (R-value) of the duct insulation to be used on this project. Reference: Section 503.2.7, IECC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson. |
| 12/07/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Needs Review | |
| 12/07/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/10/2012 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/10/2012 | ERIC NEWCOMB | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Passed | |
| 12/10/2012 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SHEET A-0.1; PROJECT CODE ANALYSIS: THE ACCESSIBILITY CODE IS LISTED AS THE 2010 ADAAG. REVISE TO THE ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003. 2. SHEET F-1.1; FLOOR PLAN: PER SECTION 1017 OF THE 2006 IBC, THE HALLWAY (CORRIDOR) IF SERVING MORE THAN 30 OCCUPANTS MUST BE FIRE RATED. VERIFY (SHEET A-1.1 INDICATES WALL 'A' MAY STOP 6" ABOVE CEILING). 3. SHEET A-1.4; WALL SECTIONS 2, 4, AND 5: AT THE DIAGONAL WALL BRACE, INDICATE THE SIZE OF THE BRACE, AND THE CONNECTOR SIZE AND QUANTITY AT THE STUD AND AT THE STRUCTURE ABOVE. 4. SHEET A-4.1; ELEVATIONS 3, 4, 5, 6, AND 7: AT THE DIAGONAL WALL BRACE, INDICATE THE SIZE OF THE BRACE, AND THE CONNECTOR SIZE AND QUANTITY AT THE STUD AND AT THE STRUCTURE ABOVE. 5. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 12/10/2012 | KEN BROUILLETTE | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/10/2012 | ERIC NEWCOMB | ADA | REVIEW | Passed |