Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: MODULAR BUILDINGS
Permit Number - T12CM07609
Review Name: MODULAR BUILDINGS
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12/03/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Clarify the status of the existing detail shop; was it a conditioned space prior to the current activity? Reference: section 101.4.3, IECC 2006. 2. Correct the envelope energy calculations for the addition to the existing detail shop so that the components used in the calculations correspond to the proposed construction. Reference: Section 102.1, IECC 2006. 3. Provide a detail to show how the exhaust fan is being supported from the building structure. 4. Provide the minimum mounting height for the exhaust fan. Reference: Sections 401.4.2 and 501.2.1, IMC 2006. 5. Provide an exhaust duct for the clothes dryer. Reference: section 504.1, IMC 2006. |
| 12/03/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide the water heater detail referenced in detail 2/P1.2. 2. An approved 2-way cleanout fitting is a listed, single fitting, not a field-assembled group of individual fittings. Provide the listing information for the proposed 2", 2-way cleanout. Reference: Sections 708.3.5 and 708.5, IPC 2006. 3. Provide the dimensions for the proposed scupper and downspout. Reference: Sections 1106 and 1107.3, IPC 2006. 4. Provide the rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole and the first floor elevation. Determine the need for a backwater valve per Section 715.1, IPC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson. |
| 12/03/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/04/2012 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SHEET A1.0 (SITE PLAN); SHEET A2.0 (FLOOR PLAN): SHEET A1.0 INDICATES AN APPROXIMATE SF OF 330 FOR THE UTILITY (STORAGE) BUILDING, WHILE SHEET A2.0 INDICATES A 12'-8"X36'-0" BUILDING ADDITION (APPROXIMATELY 455 SF). CLARIFY. 2. SHEET A2.0; FLOOR PLAN: KEYNOTE 4 INDICATES A NEW UTILITY SINK. THE NOTE IS ON THE PLAN, BUT NO SINK IS INDICATED. VERIFY. 3. SHEET A2.0; FLOOR PLAN: KEYNOTE 21 INDICATES A NEW TRANSFORMER. THE NOTE IS ON THE PLAN, BUT NO TRANSFORMER IS INDICATED. VERIFY. 4. SHEET A2.0; FLOOR PLAN: INDICATE THE NEW CT CAN AND ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT PER KEYNOTES 23 AND 26. 5. SHEET A3.0; KEYNOTES: REMOVE KEYNOTES THAT DO NOT PERTAIN TO THIS SHEET SECTION AND ELEVATIONS. 6. SHEET S1.0 (DETAIL 2); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 6): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE CMU WALL REINFORCING AS #4 @ 16" OC, WHILE THE DETAIL INDICATES #4 @ 32" OC. CLARIFY. 7. SHEET S1.0 (AUTO DISPLAY TOWER); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 12): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE A FOOTING SIZE OF 50'X38", WHILE THE PLAN (AND DETAIL 15) INDICATE A 2'-6" SQUARE X 2'-6" DEEP FOOTING. CLARIFY. 8. SHEET S1.0; AUTO DISPLAY TOWER: A NOTE INDICATES TO SEE THE MANUFACTURER'S CUT SHEETS FOR THE TOWER. PROVIDE THOSE SHEETS. 9. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 12/04/2012 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: T12CM07609 Building Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 4, 2012 1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning has reviewed the building plan and the plan appears to match the approved development plan but due to the amount of comments from other PDSD review agencies Zoning will not stamp and approve at this time. 3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved development package. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 |
| 12/04/2012 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/04/2012 | BETH GRANT | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Approved | |
| 12/05/2012 | KEN BROUILLETTE | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/05/2012 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Needs Review | Needs to match an approved DP |
| 12/13/2012 | FRODRIG2 | WWM | REVIEW | Needs Review |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12/13/2012 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |