Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Permit Number - T12CM07499
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/07/2013 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/04/2012 | KEN BROUILLETTE | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/05/2012 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 12/05/2012 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Building Plans will be approved upon approval of DP11-0022. Once all comments have been addressed under the DP the building plans can be stamped approved at the counter. |
| 12/10/2012 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SHEET AS1.2; SITE PLAN KEYNOTES: KEYNOTE 25 HAS A REFERENCE TO 10/A9.2 FOR A SITE WALL. REVISE THE REFERENCE. 2. SHEET AS1.2; SITE PLAN KEYNOTES: KEYNOTE 3 WAS NOT LOCATED ON THE PLAN. VERIFY. 3. SHEET AS1.2; SITE PLAN KEYNOTES: KEYNOTE 29 WAS NOT LOCATED ON THE PLAN. VERIFY. 4. SHEET A1.1; FLOOR PLAN: REMOVE THE CLOUD FROM NOTE 26 ON GRID C. 5. SHEET A1.1; FLOOR PLAN KEYNOTES: KEYNOTE 19 WAS NOT LOCATED ON THE PLAN. VERIFY. 6. SHEET A1.1; FLOOR PLAN: KEYNOTE 20 ON THE PLAN ON GRID D AT THE CORRIDOR IS NOT CORRECT. REVISE. 7. SHEET A2.1; ELEVATION KEYNOTES: KEYNOTE 7 INDICATES TO REFERENCE 2/AS2.1 FOR A CONTROL JOINT. THAT DETAIL IS A CONTROL JOINT FOR A SLAB ON GRADE. ADD A WALL CONTROL JOINT DETAIL ON THE DRAWINGS, OR A DETAIL REFERENCE. 8. SHEET A4.1; SECTION KEYNOTES: KEYNOTE 6 WAS NOT LOCATED ON THE SECTIONS. VERIFY. 9. SHEET A4.1; SECTION KEYNOTES: KEYNOTE 15 WAS NOT LOCATED ON THE SECTIONS. VERIFY. 10. SHEET A4.1; SECTION KEYNOTES: KEYNOTE 17 WAS NOT LOCATED ON THE SECTIONS. VERIFY. 11. SHEET A4.1; SECTION KEYNOTES: KEYNOTE 18 WAS NOT LOCATED ON THE SECTIONS. VERIFY. 12. SHEET A5.1 (SECTION 2); SHEET S3.1 (ROOF FRAMING PLAN): THE STRUCTURAL PLAN INDICATES A STEEL BEAM (LT1) AT THE CMU WALL OPENING, WHILE THE ARCHITECTURAL SECTIONS (2/A5.1 AND 3/A9.2) INDICATE A BOND BEAM. COORDINATE. 13. SHEET A5.1 (SECTION 4); SHEET S3.1 (ROOF FRAMING PLAN): THE STRUCTURAL PLAN INDICATES A STEEL BEAM (LT3) AT THE CMU WALL OPENING, WHILE THE ARCHITECTURAL SECTION (4/A5.1) INDICATES A BOND BEAM. COORDINATE. 14. SHEET A5.1; SECTION KEYNOTES: KEYNOTE 4 WAS NOT LOCATED ON THE SECTIONS. VERIFY. 15. SHEET A5.1; SECTION KEYNOTES: KEYNOTES 11, 12, 13, 20, 21, AND 26 WERE NOT LOCATED ON THE SECTIONS. VERIFY. 16. SHEET A7.1; ELEVATION 11: SINCE THE BREAK ROOM IS AN ACCESSIBLE SPACE, THE SINK AND COUNTER MUST BE A MAXIMUM OF 2'-10" ABOVE THE FINISH FLOOR PER THE IBC SECTION 1109.3. VERIFY. 17. SHEET A7.1; RESTROOM KEYNOTES: KEYNOTE 20 WAS NOT LOCATED IN THE RESTROOMS. VERIFY. 18. SHEET S1.1; GENERAL STRUCTURAL NOTES (FOUNDATIONS): NOTE 1 INDICATES A SOILS REPORT WAS USED FOR THE FOUNDATION DESIGN. PROVIDE THAT REPORT FOR REVIEW. 19. SHEET S1.2 (PLYWOOD); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 88): THE CALCULATIONS AT THE ACCESS PLATFORM INDICATE #8 SCREWS AT 6" OC (TYPICAL) AND 4" OC AT THE END OF THE DIAPHRAGM. CLARIFY ON THE DRAWING THAT SCREW SPACING. IT IS NOT CLEAR IN THE NOTE. 20. SHEET S2.1 (FOUNDATION PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 40): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE CMU WALL W3 TO BE 8" WITH #5 EACH FACE AT 16" OC, WHILE THE DRAWINGS INDICATE WALL W1 (SAME WALL AS W3 IN THE CALCULATIONS) TO BE 8" CMU WITH #5 AT 48" OC. COORDINATE. 21. SHEET S2.1 (FOUNDATION PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 81): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE THE RAMP WALL TO BE 8" CONCRETE WITH #5 VERTICAL REINFORCING AT 12" OC, WHILE DETAIL 111 INDICATES AN 8" CONCRETE WALL WITH #5 VERTICALS AT 16" OC. COORDINATE. 22. SHEET S3.1 (ROOF FRAMING PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 6): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE SP1 TO BE 2X6 AT 24" OC, WHILE THE DRAWINGS (PLAN AND DETAIL 207) INDICATE THE SUB PURLINS ARE 3X6 AT 48" OC. COORDINATE. 23. SHEET S3.1 (ROOF FRAMING PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 89): IT DOESN'T APPEAR THE SHEARWALL CALCULATIONS AND THE DRAWINGS ARE COORDINATED. IN THE CALCULATIONS, THE WALL DESIGNATED SW1 ON GRID H INDICATES SW1 IN TWO LOCATIONS. ON THE PLANS, THIS IS A CMU WALL AND CANNOT BE AN SW1. CLARIFY. 24. SHEET S3.1; FRAMING PLAN NOTES: NOTE 5 INDICATES 2-2X WOOD STUDS BELOW THE TRUSS GIRDER BEARING. SHOULD THE STUDS BE METAL? VERIFY. 25. SHEET S4.1; DETAIL 109: PROVIDE THE CONCRETE WALL THICKNESS ON THE DETAIL. 26. SHEET S5.2; DETAIL 225: INDICATE HOW THE NON-BEARING STEEL STUD WALL IS LATERALLY BRACED (DETAIL OR REFERENCE). 27. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS; SHEET 89: SW2 WAS NOT LOCATED ON THE KEY PLAN. VERIFY. 28. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS; SHEET 38: NO FOOTING DESIGN WAS FOUND AT THE COLUMNS C4 (AT THE MAIN ENTRY). VERIFY. 29. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 12/13/2012 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | Zoning cannot approve the building plan until the development package has been approved |
| 12/13/2012 | BETH GRANT | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Approved | |
| 12/26/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Provide information to show how the proposed water heater is to be supported from the building structure. Reference: Sections 106.3.1 and 301.2, IPC 2006. 2. Provide cleanouts in the building sewer at intervals not exceeding 100 feet. Reference: Section 708.3.2, IPC 2006. 3. Provide the rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole. Determine the need for a backwater valve per Section 715.1, IPC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson. 4. Provide calculations to show that the roof scuppers and the overflow openings in the collector boxes are adequate to protect the roof from the rain load. Provide overflow protection for the roof. Reference: Sections 1101, 1106 and 1107, IPC 2006, and Section 1611.1, IBC 2006. |
| 12/26/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/26/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/31/2012 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | 1: GOODWILL INDUSTRIES 2: CONNECTION TO 1" WATER METER PER DRAWING P3.1 3: NEED TO SHOW LOCATION/METHOD OF CONNECTION TO PUBLIC SEWER WITH BUILDING PLAN SUBMITTAL 4: NEED WASTEWATER DP REVIEW & APPROVAL 5: NEED ADDRESSING REVIEW |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01/10/2013 | CPIERCE1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |