Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI
Permit Number - T12CM07481
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12/04/2012 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SHEET A1 (SHELL BUILDING CODE REVIEW); SHEET A-2 (FLOOR PLAN): SHEET A1 INDICATES THIS WILL BE A RESTAURANT (A2) OCCUPANCY, WHILE THE PLAN ON SHEET A-2 INDICATES RETAIL SPACES (M OCCUPANCY). CLARIFY. 2. SHEET A-2 (FLOOR PLAN); SHEET A-3 (BUILDING SECTION): CUT THE BUILDING SECTION 5/A-3 ON THE FLOOR PLAN. 3. SHEET A-2; FLOOR PLAN: A DOOR IN THE NORTHWEST CORNER AND TWO DOORS ON THE NORTH WALL OF THE BUILDING ARE DENOTED AS TYPE 4. THERE IS NO TYPE 4 DOOR IN THE SCHEDULE. REVISE. 4. SHEET A-2; FLOOR PLAN: TWO DOORS ON THE WEST WALL OF THE BUILDING ARE DENOTED AS TYPE 3. THESE ARE SINGLE DOORS. REVISE. 5. GENERAL: SHEETS A-2 AND A-3 DO NOT HAVE THE ARCHITECT'S SIGNATURE. PROVIDE. 6. SHEET S-1.0; FOUNDATIONS: NOTE 1 INDICATES A GEOTECHNICAL REPORT WAS USED IN THE FOUNDATION DESIGN. PROVIDE THAT REPORT FOR REVIEW. 7. SHEET S1.3 (DETAIL 126); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 50): THE FOUNDATION FOR THE LIGHT POLE IN THE CALCULATIONS (30' MAXIMUM POLE HEIGHT) DIFFERS FROM THE FOUNDATION INDICATED IN THE DETAIL (20' MAXIMUM POLE HEIGHT). CLARIFY. 8. SHEET S-2.0 (FOUNDATION PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 38): IT APPEARS THAT THE SHEARWALLS INDICATED IN THE CALCULATIONS (DSWB.1 AND DSWB.2) DIFFER FROM THOSE ON THE FOUNDATION PLAN. VERIFY. 9. SHEET S-3.0; ROOF FRAMING PLAN NOTES: NOTE 10 IS LISTED TWICE. REVISE. 10. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 12/07/2012 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | Zoning canot approve the building plan until the development package has been approved. |
| 12/12/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 12/12/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | The rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole (2772.31') is less than 12" below the first floor elevation (2772.50). Provide a backwater valve per Section 715.1, IPC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson. |
| 12/12/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/18/2012 | CPIERCE1 | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | 1: RETAIL SHELL BUILDING (3-SUITES) - TWO 1-1/2" PRIVATE WATER METERS FOR END SUITES & 1-1" PRIVATE WATER METER FOR MIDDLE SUITE) 2: NEED APPROVED DP - DP12-0188 3: NEED TO SHOW LOCATION/METHOD OF CONNECTION TO PUBLIC SEWER ON BUILDING DRAWINGS 4: USING 1-1/2" WATER METER FOR SEWER CONNECTION FEE CALCULATION PER PLUMBING DRAWING P-1 FOR ENTIRE BUILDING 5: NEED PCRWRD/IWC/"RUSTY" FOR REVIEW OF GREASE INTERCEPTORS TO BE INSTALLED FOR FUTURE "END" SUITE TENANTS (2) - RUSTY 724-6200 - 3035 W EL CAMINO DEL CERRO |
| 12/19/2012 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Needs Review | |
| 12/21/2012 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Needs Review |