Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Permit Number - T12CM07014
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/03/2013 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 01/03/2013 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Comment not addressed. [Original comment: Provide site drawing showing the size, route, slope, and the connection point of the building sewer to the private sewer collection system. Reference: Section 106.3.1, IPC 2006.] 2. The use of ½" PEX will result in water velocities in excess of 6 feet per second for the bathtub. [Original comment: The water pressure calculations indicate a maximum water velocity of 6 FPS within the building and a maximum friction allowance of 17.7 PSI/100 feet. Verify that the use of ½" PEX will comply with these values for the bathtub and for the clothes washers. Reference: Section 604.1 and 604.3, IPC 2006.] |
| 01/03/2013 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Comment not addressed. [Original comment: Provide energy code compliance calculations for the building envelope; use the climate zone for Pima County < 4,000 feet. Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation and the SHGC for the fenestration. Reference: Sections 101.4 and 104.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2006.] 2. Comment not resolved. [Original comment: Condensate drains may not terminate with a direct connection to an inaccessible bathtub overflow. Show that the bathtub overflow is accessible. Reference: Section 307.2.1, IMC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson and Sections 311.4 and 807.2, UPC 2006.] |
| 01/09/2013 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 01/09/2013 | LAITH ALSHAMI | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Needs Review | |
| 12/26/2012 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner Zoning Review Section PROJECT: T12CM07012, T12CM07013, T12CM07014 3700 S Calle Polar Transitional Housing TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 26, 2012 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. 1. Zoning has reviewed the building plans for the compliance with the development package (DP) site plan. The building plans appear to in substantial compliance with the unapproved DP Site plan but Zoning cannot approve the building plans at this time. Zoning will approve the building plans once the DP Site Plan has been approved by all reviewers. 2. The amenities other than the location of the Ramada as noted in special exception condition #7 cannot be verified on the development plan included in the building package. The reviewer on the development package made the comment in his last review that the benches and canopy trees must be indicated and annotated on the development package sheets. Ensure that the most current and approved development package sheets are included in the building package prior to the next building plans submittal for review and approval. . 3. The site plan included in the building plan set must match the DP Site Plan. 4. Zoning is willing to review and approve the building plans over the counter with and appointment once the development package is approved and included with the building plans package. (Call in advance for an appointment if you wish to have an over the counter review, assuming zoning is the final approval needed.) If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised plans and any additional requested documents |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01/09/2013 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |