Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI
Permit Number - T12CM06871
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/06/2012 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SHEET G1-03; BUILDING CODE SUMMARY: THE PLUMBING CODE INDICATES THE 1998 ICC/ANSI 117.1 WAS USED. REVISE. 2. SHEET G1-03; BUILDING CODE SUMMARY: FOR ACCESSIBILITY, REFERENCE THE ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003. 3. SHEET G1-03: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE. 4. SHEETS A2-01.11, A2-01.21, A2-01.22, A2-01.31, A2-01B, A2-01C.1, A2-03.1, A4-01D.1, A4-01D.2, A4-01E, A4-01F, A4-01G.1, A4-01G.2, A4-01H.1, A4-01J.1, A4-01K.1, A4-01K.2, A4-01L, A4-01M, AND A4-03A.1; PLAN NOTES: CLARIFY THE NOTES AND REVISE THE NUMBERING OF THOSE NOTES. 5. SHEET A4-01M; KEYED REVISION NOTES: NOTE 30 WAS NOT FOUND ON THE PLAN. VERIFY. 6. SHEET A11-03; ELEVATION 2D: PROVIDE A 2'-10" DIMENSION FOR THE SINK HEIGHT AT THE BREAK ROOM. 7. SHEET S3-01; DETAIL 5: PROVIDE THE THICKNESS OF THE NEW FOOTING. 8. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 11/07/2012 | KEN BROUILLETTE | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | The plans do not indicate the 2006 IFC as a governing code. Were the plans not developed using the IFC? Are the FSD's controlled by duct detectors or corridor smoke protection. Do you have cut sheets on the FD and FSD to be installed? On the G pages, could you lay in the location of the FD and FSD in the rated walls? This will make it easier for plan review and inspections. |
| 11/07/2012 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | T12CM06871 1601 W Saint Mary's Hospital T.I. 1. C. of T. Commercial Submittal Requirements (Minimum) requires all plans must be" drawn to scale with a minimum text size at least 3/32'' uppercase or lower.Several pages which show equipment details, schedules and legends are of smaller size. 2. Under Electrical Plan Requirements (Commercial Submittal Requirments), a. Assign circuit to each receptacle, light, appliance, disconnect, electrical equipment and indicate panel circuit feeds from. b. the single line diagram of the service is to show the tenant load and building service load. In this case the existing building and new load added to it. 3. Provide complete panel schedules which show a. along with panel name,voltage phases, location, the withstand rating. b. load in watts for each circuit ( since the loads will be changed in the remodel, new need to be added) c. total connected load for each circuit ( some not inserted) d. balancing of phases to with in 15% Identification of circuits critical since some of these will be Life Branch circuits, some Critical Branch circuits and some Nonessential loads. Note on plan indicates the Contractor is to take responsibility for distribution of circuits to the one's left due to demolition, and also load dispersment. This needs to be provided in the plans not per the contractor. Please provide written responses to all Review comments. Ray T Majuta Electrical Plan Review PDSD, C of Tucson 11/08/2012 Ray.Majuta@tucsonaz.gov |
| 11/13/2012 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/23/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Clarify the plumbing code to be used for this activity. The Plumbing General Notes on sheet P000 refer to the 2006 UPC but the Code analysis on sheet G1-01 refers to the 2006 IPC. This review has been made using the 2006 IPC. 2. Verify that the specified clinical sink (CS-1) is being installed correctly and in a manner consistent with the Code and the manufacturer's instructions. The specified sink has an integral trap. Reference: Sections 106.3.1 and 303.2, IPC 2006. 3. Verify that the specified clinical sink (CS-1) complies with the maximum water consumption limit of Section 604.4, IPC 2006. 4. Revise the plumbing floor plan A/P2-01 and water riser diagram 5/P6-01 to show the specified 1-1/4" water supply to the flush valve for the clinical sink. Reference: Section 106.3.1, IPC 2006. 5. Verify that tempered water for the lavatories is being provided with approved devices conforming to ASSE 1070. Reference: Section 416.5, IPC 2006. 6. Clarify the scope of work noted on sheet P1-04 regarding the relocation of the storm drain (e.g. size, existing location, proposed location or route). Reference: Section 106.3.1, IPC 2006. |
| 11/23/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/23/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Condensate drains from air conditioning units may not terminate over a roof drain or gutter unless the roof drain or gutter terminates at or above grade in an area capable of absorbing the condensate flow without surface drainage. Reference: Section 307.2.1, IMC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson. 2. Verify the temperature of the liquid being drained from the electric steam generator (detail 3/M8-01). Water at temperatures greater than 140 degrees Fahrenheit shall not be discharged to the sanitary drain system but shall be allowed to cool below 140 degrees Fahrenheit prior to being discharged into an indirect waste receptor connected to the sanitary drain system. Reference: Section 803.1, IPC 2006. 3. Provide calculations demonstrating adequate ventilation. Reference: Section 403.3, IMC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson. |
| 11/28/2012 | ELIZABETH LEIBOLD | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | 1) All future improvements will be cumulative in percentage, to include this project. When the cumulative improvements equal or exceed 50% of the current value of the structure; no other improvements will be permitted unless the entire structure is brought into compliance with the City of Tucson Floodplain and Erosion Hazard Area Regulations (Chapter 26, Tucson Code). If the project is determined to be a substantial improvement, and, if it is determined that the lowest flood elevation is below the regulatory floor elevation, a design submittal, and review and acceptance of the submittal for flood regulation compliance will be required and shall conform to current City of Tucson floodplain development requirements in effect on the date of authorization by the Planning & Development Services Department. 2) For future improvements to this structure, a qualified appraisal shall be provided to Planning & Development Services Department - Engineering Division. The appraisal shall serve as documentation, as required, demonstrating that the value of the future improvements to this structure is less than 50% of the current value of the total appraised/assessed value of the existing structure, not including the land. An application / processing / submittal fee (and if applicable, any review fees) must accompany each future request for work to be authorized for this building structure. Engineering study review fees may be imposed based upon the fee schedule in the current floodplain ordinance. It shall be the responsibility of the owner to supply the following for all work to be authorized for future improvements: " An 8-1/2" x 11" map locating improvement on this parcel " Description of improvement " Provide permit activity number(s) " Title of improvement " Type of assessment used for valuation " Cumulative value of the building structure " Value of proposed improvement in U. S. Dollars " A calculated percent improvement Engineering will stamp plans once all reviewers have approved plans. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12/12/2012 | CPIERCE1 | APPROVAL SHELF | Completed |
| 12/12/2012 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 12/12/2012 | CPIERCE1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |