Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI
Permit Number - T12CM06711
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/06/2012 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SHEET D1; KEY NOTES: NOTE D6.6 WAS NOT LOCATED ON THE PLAN. VERIFY. 2. SHEET D1; KEY NOTES: NOTE D9.1 WAS NOT LOCATED ON THE PLAN. VERIFY. 3. SHEET D1; KEY NOTES: NOTE D9.3 WAS SHOWN ON THE PLAN (SOUTH RESTROOM NEAR THE STAIR), BUT THIS NOTE IS NOT IN THE KEY NOTES. VERIFY. 4. SHEET D1; KEY NOTES: NOTE D16.3 WAS SHOWN ON THE PLAN (SOUTH WALL), BUT THIS NOTE IS NOT IN THE KEY NOTES. VERIFY. 5. SHEET D1.1; KEY NOTES: NOTE D9.7 WAS NOT LOCATED ON THE PLAN. VERIFY. 6. SHEET D1.1; KEY NOTES: NOTE D15.5 WAS NOT LOCATED ON THE PLAN. VERIFY. 7. SHEET D1.1; KEY NOTES: NOTE D15.7 WAS NOT LOCATED ON THE PLAN. VERIFY. 8. SHEET D1.1; KEY NOTES: NOTE D16.3 WAS NOT LOCATED ON THE PLAN. VERIFY. 9. SHEET A1; WALL DETAIL: DETAILS 2 AND 4 INDICATE WALL BRACING WHEN THE WALL IS PARALLEL TO THE FRAMING ABOVE. PROVIDE A DETAIL FOR THE CASE OF THE WALL PERPENDICULAR TO THE FRAMING (ADDED MEMBERS BETWEEN EXISTING FRAMING). 10. SHEET A1; FLOOR PLAN: DOORS TO THE JANITOR, ELECTRIC, AND PHONE ROOMS REDUCE THE HALL WIDTH BY OVER HALF. VERIFY IBC SECTION 1021.2 IS MET. 11. SHEET A1; FLOOR PLAN: A WALL ELEVATION MARK AT THE EAST WALL OF THE FRACTURE ROOM INDICATES --/A6. REVISE. 12. SHEET A1; KEY NOTES: NOTES 16.3, 16.4, AND 16.5 WERE SHOWN ON THE PLAN, BUT NOT IN THE KEY NOTES. CLARIFY. 13. SHEET A1; KEY NOTES: NOTES 6.4, 6.6, 6.8, 6.9, 6.11, 6.13, 9.1, 9.2, 9.3, 9.4, 9.5, 10.1, 10.5, 10.13, 10.17, AND 15.4 WERE NOT LOCATED ON THE PLAN (OR ON A2 PLAN). VERIFY. 14. SHEET A1; KEY NOTES: NOTE 9.2 INDICATES AN INCOMPLETE DETAIL. REVISE REFERENCE. 15. SHEET A1; KEY NOTES: NOTE 10.1 REFERENCES AN ADA GUIDELINE FOR AN ACCESSIBLE SIGN. REVISE THE REFERENCE TO THE ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003, FIGURE 703.3.10. 16. SHEET A1; KEY NOTES: NOTES 10.3 THROUGH 10.8 REFERENCE DETAILS ON SHEET A5. REVISE THE REFERENCE. 17. SHEET A3.1; DETAIL 9: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE. 18. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 11/09/2012 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/21/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/21/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/21/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/03/2012 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12/03/2012 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 12/03/2012 | CPIERCE1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |