Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T12CM06502
Parcel: 108160070

Address:
4810 N 1ST AV

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW

Permit Number - T12CM06502
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
10/23/2012 RAY MAJUTA ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied T12CM06502

1. A calculation showing compliance with The City of Tucson Outdoor Lighting Code Ord # 10963 is required for all outdoor site and building lighting.
2. A Budget Lighting Caculation Per 2006 IECC for indoor lighting is required ( Com-Check ok).
3. A fault current calculation beginning at service and continuing through the panels is required. Show the individual AIC values required for each panel and if they are to be fully listed with breakers or fusing.
4. E-1, entry lights not circuited.
5. E-2, indicate kitchen receptacles are to be GFCI per 2005 NEC 210.8.B.2.
6. E-2, circuit A-31 marked spare in panel, receptacle in power plan, same for circuit D-28. There are other receptacles on this sheet not identified per circuit.
7. E-3 roof, circuit B-34,36,38 shown on plan as a 3/phase circuit for exhaust hoods, hovever the circuitd feed individual fans, is this for interlocking ?
8. E-3 roof, circuit B-35,37,39 for item 49 ( grille hood) show in panel as circuit B-33,35,37 ?
9.Cannot find following circuits in power plan------ Panel A-14,16,22,24,25,35,37
10. Cannot locate following circuits in Panel B---17,27,29,41,42
11. Cannot find following circuits in power plan, Panel C-11,12,30
12. Cannot find following circuits in power plan Panel D-6,7,8,10,15,23,35,37

Please address each comment individually,
Ray T Majuta
Elect Plan Review
PDSD, City of Tuc
10/23/2012
Rat.Majuta@tucsonaz.gov
10/26/2012 ERIC NEWCOMB BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. SHEET T-1; CODE ANALYSIS: ON THE PLAN, PROVIDE THE SF OF THE PATIO.
2. SHEET T-1; CODE REVIEW: IN THE OCCUPANT LOAD DETERMINATION, INCLUDE THE PATIO AND REVISE THE CODE REVIEW ON THE DRAWINGS.
3. SHEET T-1; CODE REVIEW: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE.
4. SHEET T-1; ADOPTED CODES: INCLUDE IN THE LIST OF CODES THE ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003 ACCESSIBILITY CODE.
5. SHEET A1 (FOUNDATION PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS: CALCULATIONS WERE NOT FOUND FOR THE FOOTING F1 AND PIER P1 IN FIVE LOCATIONS ON THE PLANS. PROVIDE.
6. SHEET A1; DETAILS: PROVIDE A DETAIL FOR THE CONCRETE SLAB CONTROL JOINTS.
7. SHEET A1; FOUNDATION PLAN: PROVIDE A NOTE ON THE PLAN TO SEE SHEET A4.2 FOR THE PATIO FOUNDATION.
8. SHEET A1; DETAILS 2 AND 3/A-1: PROVIDE THE THICKNESS OF THE EXTERIOR CONCRETE SLAB (REFERENCE ALT. 2/A-1 AND ALT. 3/A-1).
9. SHEET A2; FLOOR PLAN: THE WINDOW TYPE AT ROOM 102 IS NOT LEGIBLE. REVISE.
10. SHEET A2; FLOOR PLAN: THE SECTION CUT H5/A8 AT THE SHED SHOULD BE MOVED. THE CURRENT LOCATION OF THE SECTION CUT HAS A ROOF OVER THE SHED.
11. SHEET A4.1; ROOF FRAMING PLAN (C3) AND ROOF PLAN (C6): ADD A DETAIL REFERENCE FOR THE PARAPET BRACE AT THE SIDEWALLS ON THE PLANS.
12. SHEET A4.2; PATIO PLANS F2 AND F4: SECTION CUTS ON THE PLANS INDICATE SHEET A4.1. REVISE.
13. SHEET A4.2; ELEVATION B2: A NOTE INDICATES TO SEE H1/A1,1 FOR THE RAILING. REVISE THE NOTE REFERENCE.
14. SHEET A4.2; ELEVATION B4: A SECTION CUT INDICATES H7/A1.1 AT THE COLUMN. REVISE THE SECTION REFERENCE.
15. SHEET A4.2; SECTION H6: A SECTION CUT INDICATES H3/A4.1 AT THE BEAM TO COLUMN CONNECTION. REVISE THE SECTION REFERENCE.
16. SHEET A4.2; SECTION H6: A DETAIL AT THE TOP OF THE WALL INDICATES A7/A1.1. REVISE THE DETAIL REFERENCE.
17. SHEET A6: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE THE WALL SUBSTRATES AND FINISH MATERIALS LETTERING.
18. SHEET A8; SECTION B1: PROVIDE AN ADDITIONAL DETAIL INDICATING BLOCKING (SIZE AND CONNECTION) BETWEEN TRUSSES WHERE THE WALL IS PARALLEL TO THE TRUSSES.
19. SHEET A8; SECTION B3: PROVIDE BRACING SIZE AND CONNECTIONS TO THE PLATFORM AND ROOF TRUSSES.
20. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS; SHEET 9: THE GROUND SNOW LOAD FOR THE CITY OF TUCSON IS 0. REVISE THIS SHEET IF IT IS CRITICAL TO THE STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF THE BUILDING.
21. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS; SHEET 17: THE FOUNDATION DESIGN INDICATES AN ASSUMED BEARING VALUE OF 1500 PSF, WHILE THE SOIL REPORT PROVIDES FOR A 2000 PSF VALUE. REVISE THE CALCULATIONS AND/OR DRAWINGS IF THIS IS CRITICAL TO THE FOOTING DESIGN.
22. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS; SHEET 20: A 35 PSF SNOW LOAD IS INDICATED FOR THE DRIVE UP CANOPY DESIGN. REVISE AS REQUIRED.
23. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS; PATIO CANOPY: THE GROUND SNOW LOAD FOR THE CITY OF TUCSON IS 0. REVISE THE CALCULATIONS AND DRAWINGS AS REQUIRED.
24. GENERAL: PROVIDE A SITE PLAN ON A FULL SIZE DRAWING PER THE IBC SECTION 106.2.
25. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS.
10/30/2012 TERRY STEVENS ZONING REVIEW Denied Zoning cannot approve the building plans until the development package has been approved.
10/31/2012 LOREN MAKUS ENGINEERING REVIEW Approved
11/01/2012 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Approved
11/01/2012 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. The occupant load used to calculate the required ventilation is not necessarily the same as the occupant load used for calculating exiting requirements. The occupant load used for calculating the minimum required ventilation is to be based on Table 403.3, IMC 2006 or an approved engineering analysis of the specific occupancy type. Reference: Section 403.3, IMC 2006.
2. Clarify the operation instructions for the restroom exhaust fan, PRV-1. The mechanical equipment specifications call for the fan to run continuously during occupied mode but also for the fan to be wired to operate with the light switch in the men's restroom. Revise the sequence of operation for the restroom exhaust fan so that all of the air supplied to the restrooms will be exhausted during operating hours. Reference: Section 403.2.1 (4), IMC 2006.
3. Note: the location of the proposed restaurant is approximately 2,330 feet elevation and the COMcheck envelope compliance certificate should be done using "Pima County < 4,000 ft" elevation (climate zone 2b), not "Pima County >= 4,000 ft", which is for climate zone 5b.
4. Show that the clearances from combustibles for the grease duct comply with Section 506.3.6, IMC 2006 where the duct is not wrapped with the 3M Fire Barrier Duct Wrap.
5. Provide structural calculations and details to show that the Type I and Type II hoods are supported from the building structure in accordance with Section 507.6, IMC 2006. Reference: Section 302.1, IMC 2006.
6. Verify that the hood installation complies with Section 507.9, IMC 2006 with regard to a smooth, cleanable, non-absorbent, and non-combustible material installed between the hood and the wall, and extending 18" beyond the hood (a note on finish plan A7/A6 calls for the stainless steel "to hood edge").
11/01/2012 MARTIN BROWN FIRE REVIEW Approved
11/02/2012 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Revise the font size used on the drawings to a minimum of 3/32-inch (all upper case). Reference: Section 106.1.1, IBC 2006.
2. Provide a site drawing showing the size and route of the building water supply along with the location and size of both the water meter and the reduced pressure backflow preventer assembly; the size, route, and slope of the building sewer along with the installation drawings for the grease interceptor, and the backwater valve. The Development Plans are not construction drawings. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006.
3. Provide information to show that the hub drain complies with Sections 411.1 and 804.1, UPC 2006.
4. Show that the floor of the restroom slopes toward the floor drain. Reference: Section 411.2, UPC 2006.
5. Verify that the return piping for recirculated hot water for water heater being introduced to the water heater independently from the cold water supply to the water heater complies with the manufacturer's listing information. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006.
6. Provide a reduced pressure principle backflow prevention assembly for the misting system. Reference: Section 603.4.6.2, UPC 2006.
7. Provide a shut off valve for the water service at the building entrance. Reference: Section 605.2, UPC 2006.
8. Verify the calculation of the total water service demand. The use of Section 610.11 for determining the fixture units for flush valve fixtures is designed to allow pipe sizing as if the water distribution system was equipped with only flush tanks. The appropriate method to determine demand in this situation is to use curve 2 of Chart A3. Reference: Section 610.1, UPC 2006.
9. Provide upper terminal cleanouts on horizontal drainage pipes exceeding 5 feet in length (horizontal drain lines serving sinks and urinals require cleanouts regardless of length). Reference: Section 707.4, UPC 2006.
10. The rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole (2330.12') is less than 12" below the first floor elevation (2330.67'). Provide backwater valve per Section 710.1, UPC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson.
11. Provide vent piping of sufficient size to comply with Section 904.1, UPC 2006. Vents located upstream from backwater valves or other devices that obstruct the free flow of gases between the building sewer and the outside atmosphere shall not be used for meeting the required cross-sectional vent area.
12. Provide details of the installation of the gas piping in the patio columns. Reference: Sections 1211.1.6 and 1211.3, UPC 2006.
13. Provide natural gas pipe sizing calculations for the gas piping leading to the patio. As a hybrid system with regard to the pipe materials, you need to show that the gas pressure from the meter to the any gas outlet in the system does not drop more than 0.5 inches of water column at full demand. Include the developed pipe lengths of the CSST on the plans. Reference: Sections 1211.17 and 1217.0, UPC 2006.
11/05/2012 GERRY KOZIOL WWM REVIEW Denied 1: CULVER'S RESTAURANT
2: NEED WW/IWC REVIEW OF GREASE INTERCEPTOR - RUSTY -3035 W EL CAMINO DEL CERRO- 724-6200
3: NEED TO SHOW SIZE AND LOCATION OF ALL WATER METERS ON DRAWINGS FOR SEWER CONNECTION FEE CALCULATIONS
4: NEED PCRWRD/3RD FLOOR/CAPACITY EVALUATION -KURT STEMM- 740-6534
5: NEED SITE UTILITY PLAN SHOWING LOCATION/METHOD OF CONNECTION TO PUBLIC SEWER - CHAD AMATEAU - 740-6547

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
12/18/2012 CPIERCE1 REJECT SHELF Completed