Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI
Permit Number - T12CM05977
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/08/2012 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SHEET A-1; SCOPE: THE SCOPE INDICATES "ALL WORK WILL OCCUR UNDER THE EXISTING ROOF". REVISE. 2. SHEET A-1; CODE REVIEW (EXIT WIDTH): THE NUMBER OF EXITS REQUIRED AND THE EXIT WIDTH REQUIRED ARE BASED ON 20 OCCUPANTS, WHILE THE BUILDING OCCUPANCY IS LISTED AS 24. COORDINATE. 3. SHEET A-2; FLOOR PLAN: KEYNOTE 3 REFERENCES STRUCTURAL FOR ADDITIONAL SLAB REQUIREMENTS AT THE OUTDOOR PATIO. GIVE A SPECIFIC REFERENCE. 4. SHEET A-2; FLOOR PLAN: AT THE SOUTH END, ELEVATION 2/A-3 IS INDICATED. REVISE THE REFERENCE. 5. SHEET A-2; FLOOR PLAN: ADD BUILDING ELEVATION INDICATORS1/A-3, 2/A-3, AND 3/A-3 ON THE PLAN. 6. SHEET A-2; FLOOR PLAN: CUT SECTION 8/A-3 ON THE PLAN. 7. SHEET A-3; FLOOR PLAN KEYNOTES: REVISE THE TITLE TO BUILDING ELEVATION KEYNOTES. 8. SHEET A-3; KEYNOTES: ADD KEYNOTE 4 TO THE WEST AND EAST ELEVATIONS. 9. SHEET A-3; KEYNOTES: ADD KEYNOTE 7 TO THE EAST AND SOUTH ELEVATIONS. 10. SHEET A-3; KEYNOTES: KEYNOTE 14 (EXISTING SIGN) IS NOT CORRECT ON THE WEST ELEVATION. REVISE. 11. SHEET A-3; KEYNOTES: KEYNOTE 15 WAS NOT FOUND ON THE ELEVATIONS. VERIFY. 12. SHEET A-3; SECTION 8: DETAIL 9/A-3 IS REFERENCED ON THIS SECTION. REVISE THE DETAIL INDICATOR. 13. SHEET A-4; PROJECT DATA: UNDER 'BUILDING AREA CHANGES', THE EXISTING BUILDING AREA IS LISTED AS 880 SF, WITH A PROPOSED BUILDING AREA OF 1081 SF. IN THE 'BUILDING/USE AREAS', THE BUILDING AREA IS LISTED AS 1081 SF WITH AN ADDITIONAL 541 SF AT THE PATIO (1622 SF TOTAL). CLARIFY. THE OCCUPANCY LOAD ON SHEET A-1 IS BASED ON THE 1622 SF. 14. SHEET S200; FOUNDATION PLAN: ADD A PLAN NOTE FOR THE NEW CONCRETE SLAB OVER THE EXISTING CONCRETE SLAB AT THE COVERED PATIO (SEE KEYNOTE 3 ON SHEET A-2). 15. SHEET S400; DETAILS 402, 403, AND 405: ADD A NOTE TO THESE DETAILS CONCERNING THE DEPTH OF THE FOOTING (MATCH EXISTING). 16. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 10/09/2012 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | Multiple references to existing fire sprinkler system. I do not believe this address contains a sprinkler system. Verify, and remove all references to a sprinkler system from the plan, or indicate sprniklers will be extended to include new canopy. |
| 10/15/2012 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | T12CM05977 1. City of Tucson Submittal Requirements: all new or relocated lighting has to be assigned a circuit and it's panel identified. 2. Panel A shows a 42KAIC ,will this be a fully rated system along with the breakers ? What is the fault current at the service ? Ray T Majuta Elect Pln Review, PDSD, C of Tuc 10/16/2012 520-837/4988 |
| 10/22/2012 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Approved | THE PROPERTY OWNER ACKNOWLEDGES THAT THE EXISTING HCS CONNECTION GOES THROUGH ANOTHER PROPERTY. THE REPAIR AND MAINTENENACE OF THE HCS IS THE SOLER RESPONSIBILITY OF THE BUILDING OWNER. |
| 10/23/2012 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | From: David Rivera Zoning review section October 24, 2012 Zoning cannot approve the building plans until the Development Package site plan is approved. |
| 10/24/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/24/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/24/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/02/2012 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved |