Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T12CM05966
Parcel: 11104151C

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESUBMITTAL

Permit Number - T12CM05966
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
11/07/2012 ERIC NEWCOMB BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied PREVIOUS COMMENTS WERE NOT ADDRESSED:
1. SHEET A.3; FOOTING SCHEDULE: THE FOOTING MARKED F-1 INDICATES TO SEE DETAIL 1. REVISE THE DETAIL NUMBER.
2. SHEET A.3; FOOTING SCHEDULE: THE FOOTING MARKED F-2 INDICATES TO SEE DETAIL 2. REVISE THE DETAIL NUMBER.
3. SHEET A.3; DETAILS 5, 6, AND 7: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE THE DETAIL NOTES.
4. SHEET A.3; DETAIL 5: THE NEW PORTION OF THE FOOTING ON THE DETAIL HAS A 1'-4" DIMENSION, WHILE THE FOOTING SCHEDULE INDICATES 3'-0" SQUARE. CLARIFY.
5. SHEET A.3; DETAIL 5: THE FOOTING DEPTH ON THE DETAIL IS INDICATED AS 1'-6", WHILE THE FOOTING SCHEDULE INDICATES 1'-8". CLARIFY.
6. SHEET A.3; DETAIL 6: THE FOOTING DEPTH ON THE DETAIL IS INDICATED AS 1'-6", WHILE THE FOOTING SCHEDULE INDICATES 1'-8". CLARIFY.
7. SHEET A.3; PARTIAL FOUNDATION PLAN 3: A DETAIL CUT THROUGH THE F-2 FOOTING ON THE RIGHT INDICATES 7/6. REVISE.
8. PREVIOUS COMMENT 4: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. THIS WAS NOT DONE ON ANY REVIEW COMMENTS.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
11/14/2012 SHANAE POWELL OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed