Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T12CM05966
Parcel: 11104151C

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESUBMITTAL

Permit Number - T12CM05966
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
10/04/2012 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Passed Envelope energy calculation corrected.
10/11/2012 ERIC NEWCOMB BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. SHEET A.3; FOOTING SCHEDULE: THE FOOTING MARKED F-1 INDICATES TO SEE DETAIL 1. REVISE THE DETAIL NUMBER.
2. SHEET A.3; FOOTING SCHEDULE: THE FOOTING MARKED F-2 INDICATES TO SEE DETAIL 2. REVISE THE DETAIL NUMBER.
3. SHEET A.3; DETAILS 5, 6, AND 7: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE THE DETAIL NOTES.
4. SHEET A.3; DETAIL 5: THE NEW PORTION OF THE FOOTING ON THE DETAIL HAS A 1'-4" DIMENSION, WHILE THE FOOTING SCHEDULE INDICATES 3'-0" SQUARE. CLARIFY.
5. SHEET A.3; DETAIL 5: THE FOOTING DEPTH ON THE DETAIL IS INDICATED AS 1'-6", WHILE THE FOOTING SCHEDULE INDICATES 1'-8". CLARIFY.
6. SHEET A.3; DETAIL 6: THE FOOTING DEPTH ON THE DETAIL IS INDICATED AS 1'-6", WHILE THE FOOTING SCHEDULE INDICATES 1'-8". CLARIFY.
7. SHEET A.3; PARTIAL FOUNDATION PLAN 3: A DETAIL CUT THROUGH THE F-2 FOOTING ON THE RIGHT INDICATES 7/6. REVISE.
8. PREVIOUS COMMENT 4: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. THIS WAS NOT DONE ON THE SECOND REVIEW COMMENTS.
10/18/2012 TERRY STEVENS ZONING REVIEW Approved Zoning cannot approve the building plan until the development package submittal has been approved.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
11/07/2012 FERNE RODRIGUEZ REJECT SHELF Completed