Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T12CM05966
Parcel: 11104151C

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESUBMITTAL

Permit Number - T12CM05966
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
10/01/2012 ERIC NEWCOMB BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. SHEET A3 (FOOTING SCHEDULE); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 7): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE FOOTING F1 TO BE 1'-8" X 3'-0", WHILE THE FOOTING SCHEDULE INDICATES A 1'-6" X 3'-0" FOOTING. COORDINATE.
2. SHEET A3 (FOOTING SCHEDULE); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 7): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE FOOTING F2 TO BE 10" X 2'-0", WHILE THE FOOTING SCHEDULE INDICATES A 1'-6" X 5'-8" FOOTING. COORDINATE.
3. SHEET A3; SECTIONS 5 AND 6: THE NEW PORTION OF THE FOOTINGS ARE DESIGNATED AS "EXISTING FOOTING". REVISE.
4. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS.
10/01/2012 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied Comment not resolved. Use Pima County <4.000 feet for the calculations. The calculations show only an exterior wall being added; was the porch roof previously insulated? Include the roof in the calculations. [Original comment: Provide energy code compliance calculations for the additions to the building envelope; use the climate zone for Pima County < 4,000 feet. Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the additions to the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation and the SHGC for the fenestration. Reference: Sections 101.4, 101.4.3, and 104.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2006.]
10/04/2012 GBONILL1 ZONING REVIEW Needs Review