Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T12CM05621
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/09/2013 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/21/2012 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/24/2012 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Adobe Surgery Center - Expansion T12CM05162 Building Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 24, 2012 1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning can not approve the building plan until a development package has been approved. 3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved development package. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 |
| 12/27/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Comment not resolved; coordinate the building components used in the calculations with the proposed building shown on the architectural plans. [Original comment: Clarify the envelope energy calculations for this addition; two very different calculations have been provided, one on G1 and another on M9.11.] |
| 12/27/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Comment not resolved; include the structural sketches on the drawings. [Original comment: Provide calculations and a structural detail to show how the proposed support platform for the 40-gallon water heater is to be connected to the building structure. Reference: Sections 106.3.1 and 301.2, IPC 2006.] 2. Comment not resolved; a T&P relief valve is not the same as a vacuum relief valve (see Watts model N360 for an example of a vacuum relief valve). [Original comment: Provide an approved anti-siphon device (e.g. vacuum relief valve) for a storage-type water heater located above any fixture outlets. Reference: Section 504.1, IPC 2006.] |
| 12/27/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved |