Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI
Permit Number - T12CM05621
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/14/2012 | RONALD BROWN | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/14/2012 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | Justify "B" occupancy where building contains anesthesia and operating rooms. |
| 09/20/2012 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | T12CM05621 2585 N Wyatt Medical Office 1. Sheet E4.1, the equipment conductors in the feeders from the new 1600 amp wireway to the main disconnect for Panel F are undersized. They should be sized according to 250.66 since they are ahead of any overcurrent devices. 2. The equipment conductors in the feeders from the new 1600 amp wireway to the main for the existing SES are undersized. They should be sized per 250.66 since they are ahead of any overcurrent devices. 3. The feeders from the 800 amp Main to the existing SES do not show an equipment ground. 4. Roof feeders in conduit, the 600 amp Main using two sets of 350MCM at 310 amps need to be derated due to exposure to sun and heat. Example,if using THWN or XHHW 90 degree C at .82 Correction Factor (114 to 122 degrees F), (the 310 amps X.82= 508.4 amps). The 600 amp feeder shown may be insufficient, please respond. 5. Sheet E4.2, panel schedule for EM-1 circuit 9 lists "exterior EM light at Generator", Sheet E2.0 shows the same circuit as receptacle power in post-op. 6. New Panels EM-1,G and H are located in the Supplies and Storage Room. There appears to be shelving being installed in this room, indicate on power plan clearance per 110.26 is required. Ray T Majuta Elect Plan Review PDSD, C of Tuc 9/24/2012 Ray.Majuta@tucsonaz.gov |
| 09/21/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Denied | Show the size and location of the water meter and the reduced pressure backflow preventer assembly providing water service to this building. Clarify if multiple water meters are serving the building. Reference: Section 106.3.1, IPC 2006. |
| 09/21/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Revise the "Plumbing Sanitary Swear (sic) Reno Riser" on sheet M8.1 to show the condensate drains connecting to the tailpieces of the sinks rather than to the fixture drains (keynote 5, 2 places). Reference: Section: 106.3.1, IPC 2006. 2. Provide calculations and a structural detail to show how the proposed support platform for the 40-gallon water heater is to be connected to the building structure. Reference: Sections 106.3.1 and 301.2, IPC 2006. 3. Provide an approved anti-siphon device (e.g. vacuum relief valve) for a storage-type water heater located above any fixture outlets. Reference: Section 504.1, IPC 2006. 4. Show how the water connections to each of the relocated humidifiers are protected from backflow. Reference: Section 608.2, IPC 2006. 5. Provide cleanouts sized per Section 708.7, IPC 2006 (i.e. a 4" pipe requires a 4" cleanout). 6. Provide a cleanout at the base of each roof drain stack prior to connection to the horizontal storm drain. Reference: Sections 708.3.4 and 1101.8, IPC 2006. 7. Provide roof drainage calculations and plans for the new roofs and for those roofs for which the roof drainage is being modified. Provide overflow protection for the roofs. Reference: Sections 1101, 1106 and 1107, IPC 2006. 8. Clarify the natural gas pipe sizing calculations. The design criteria shown on sheet M9.3 specifies a pressure drop of 0.5-inches of water but the gas sizing table referenced is based on a pressure drop of 0.3-inches of water. With either pressure drop, most of the pipe sizes are for the common pipes are incorrect. Reference: Section 402.3, IFGC 2006. |
| 09/24/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Clarify the envelope energy calculations for this addition; two very different calculations have been provided, one on G1 and another on M9.11. |
| 09/26/2012 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Adobe Surgery Center - Expansion T12CM05621 Building Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 27, 2012 1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning can not approve the building plan until a development package has been approved. 3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved development package. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 |
| 10/05/2012 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10/2012 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 10/10/2012 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | REJECT SHELF | Completed |